US, Pakistan negotiate deal on N-security

un-believeable. Pakistan without nukes means it is at the mercy of India.

Khan Saab wrote:

un-believeable. Pakistan without nukes means it is at the mercy of India.

OK but although with nukes,u r at mercy of U.S.,china,iran,saudis etc etc etc.

We r best but our rulers are corrupt

It is not Taliban you have to worry about it is the military and its gereeedy generals. for many years they went abroad to sell their nuke technology complete with warheads. When Libya told US they used hero AQ Khan as conveninet excuse. But don't worry US and the west saw through this deceit. Now the nuke sarew safefully in hands of US and the generals have walked free witohut fear of prosecution. THe US used same tactics with ggenerals as it did with thief Zardari. Both were blackmailed into following US order and if they refused the billions they have in western bank accounts would be confiscated. As you know the generals and Zardaris gang have only one god and that is the dollar. If you threaten to take this from them they will sell their wife,children and parents.

I am happy that Pakistan has chosen the path of South Africa by handing over its nukes.Good for you.Keep up the good work.

Ubuntu they only handed them over because they were caught selling warheads to rogue states. In fact they already sold nukes to North Korea. Libya told all to US about Pak nuke cash and carry. The generals must be prosecuted.

ProfessorKISA1 wrote:

Ubuntu they only handed them over because they were caught selling warheads to rogue states. In fact they already sold nukes to North Korea. Libya told all to US about Pak nuke cash and carry. The generals must be prosecuted.

USA Military Loss 1000 Nuclear part at this day ...we see TAXAS Shooting ..in same way if some Angry Army officer decide to get hand on USA Nuke Arsenal and it is very much like Situation So USA,India, Russia and all Other ...everyone ..Nuclear Security is Still a Question?

Oh dear Ansari why do you persist in fantasising about Pak being like other normal countries? Stop making excuses and propaganda for them. Wake up and as the US say "smell the coffee"

ProfessorKISA1 wrote:

Oh dear Ansari why do you persist in fantasising about Pak being like other normal countries? Stop making excuses and propaganda for them. Wake up and as the US say "smell the coffee"

Missing Nukes on August 29-30, 2007

According to a wide range of reports, several nuclear bombs were “lost” for 36 hours after taking off August 29/30, 2007 on a “cross-country journey” across the U.S., from U.S.A.F Base Minot in North Dakota to U.S.A.F. Base Barksdale in Louisiana.[1] Reportedly, in total there were six W80-1 nuclear warheads armed on AGM-129 Advanced Cruise Missiles (ACMs) that were “lost.”[2] The story was first reported by the Military Times, after military servicemen leaked the story.

It is also worth noting that on August 27, 2007, just days before the "lost" nukes incident, three B-52 Bombers were performing special missions under the direct authorization of General Moseley, the Chief of Staff of the U.S. Air Force.[3] The exercise was reported as being an aerial information and image gathering mission. The base at Minot is also home of the 91st Space Wings, a unit under the command of Air Force Space Command (AFSPC).

According to official reports, the U.S. Air Force pilots did not know that they were carrying weapons of mass destruction (WMDs). Once in Louisiana, they also left the nuclear weapons unsecured on the runway for several hours.[4]

U.S. Air Force Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations, Plans, and Requirements, Major-General Richard Y. Newton III commented on the incident, saying there was an “unprecedented” series of procedural errors, which revealed “an erosion of adherence to weapons-handling standards”[5]

These statements are misleading. The lax security was not the result of procedural negligence within the U.S. Air Force, but rather the consequence of a deliberate tampering of these procedures.

If a soldier, marine, airman, or sailor were even to be issued a rifle and rifle magazine — weaponry of a far lesser significance, danger, and cost — there is a strict signing and accountability process that involves a chain of command and paperwork. This is part of the set of military checks and balances used by all the services within the U.S. Armed Forces.

Military servicemen qualified to speak on the subject will confirm that there is a stringent nuclear weapons handling procedure. There is a rigorous, almost inflexible, chain of command in regards to the handling of nuclear weapons and not just any soldier, sailor, airman, or marine is allowed to handle nuclear weapons. Only servicemen specialized in specific handling and loading procedures, are perm certified to handle, access and load nuclear warheads.

Every service personnel that moves or even touches these weapons must sign a tracking paper and has total accountability for their movement. There is good reason for the paperwork behind moving these weapons. The military officers that order the movement of nuclear weapons, including base commanders, must also fill out paper forms
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php...