Lithuania under pressure, may turn to IMF

No loans. Let Lithuania ask the anti-Gays in Russia or Saudi Arabia for help.

how did these financial experts managed 22 % loss ?
i thought, magayrs were the only runts of EU.
was i wrong ?

wow tom your an idiot, ask russia... wow serious? comment befor you know what happened between them two..

Yea. Ol' Tom aint no rocket scientist. Too busy trying to legalize buggery worldwide to attend to any schooling.

Veritas wrote:

Yea. Ol' Tom aint no rocket scientist. Too busy trying to legalize buggery worldwide to attend to any schooling.

Coming from someone who spews the doctrine of a halocaust revisionist (Scott Lively), I'll take your opposition as a badge of honor. Where did you go to home school to get your education?

Hmmm. Someone who cannot spell holocaust trying to tutor me. You're just angry because Scott Lively exposed the fact that many high-ranking members of the German Nazi Party were homosexuals. It is well-documented -- and no one has disproven that those mentally-ill sodomites were, in large part, responsible for many Nazi atrocities.

Veritas wrote:

Hmmm. Someone who cannot spell holocaust trying to tutor me. You're just angry because Scott Lively exposed the fact that many high-ranking members of the German Nazi Party were homosexuals. It is well-documented -- and no one has disproven that those mentally-ill sodomites were, in large part, responsible for many Nazi atrocities.

Not even the Far Right will have anything to do with that Halocaust Revisionist.

What does that even mean? Who is the "Far Right"? Where is your proof that they, whoever they are, will have nothing to with Scott Lively? What is you definition of Holocaust Revisionist? Lively does not assert that the Holocaust occurred. He simply asserts, correctly and through a wealth of well-researched material, that many high-ranking members of the German Nazi Party were homosexuals (the Butches) who persecuted other homosexuals (the Fems), as well as the Jews, Gypsies, and Poles.

Do you know what a boob you sound like? Bald assertions do not amount to proof.

Last post should have stated "Lively does not assert that the Holocaust did not occur."

Veritas wrote:

Last post should have stated "Lively does not assert that the Holocaust did not occur."

Scott Lively is not a Halocaust denier, but a Halocaust Revisionist.

Scott Lively's assertions (blaming Gays for Nazism),his prior behavior (paying legal settlements for actual physical violence against Gay rights supporters) and present associations (Watchmen on the Walls - a pseudo-Christian organization linked to violence against Gays in the Baltics) make it quite easy to discredit anyone associated with him. He makes Larouche supporters seem 'mainstream'

Far right wing groups such as the World Congress of Families and the American Family Assn. have parted ways with Lively and his Watchmen on the Walls. Why?

Tom in Lazybrook wrote:

<quoted text>
Scott Lively is not a Halocaust denier, but a Halocaust Revisionist.
Scott Lively's assertions (blaming Gays for Nazism),his prior behavior (paying legal settlements for actual physical violence against Gay rights supporters) and present associations (Watchmen on the Walls - a pseudo-Christian organization linked to violence against Gays in the Baltics) make it quite easy to discredit anyone associated with him. He makes Larouche supporters seem 'mainstream'
Far right wing groups such as the World Congress of Families and the American Family Assn. have parted ways with Lively and his Watchmen on the Walls. Why?

So, what is a holocaust revisionist? If someone suddenly uncovers newly-discovered Nazi documents proving that seven million Jews died in the holocaust, instead of only six million, does that make them a holocaust revisionist? Hardly. It makes them a historian worthy of note.

Scott Lively's book is well-documented, proving that homosexuals were a predominant force in the hierachy of the Nazi Party in Germany. Until you disprove that point, you have no right to criticize Scott Lively.

Veritas wrote:

<quoted text>
So, what is a holocaust revisionist? If someone suddenly uncovers newly-discovered Nazi documents proving that seven million Jews died in the holocaust, instead of only six million, does that make them a holocaust revisionist? Hardly. It makes them a historian worthy of note.
Scott Lively's book is well-documented, proving that homosexuals were a predominant force in the hierachy of the Nazi Party in Germany. Until you disprove that point, you have no right to criticize Scott Lively.

Scott Lively is a halocaust revisionist. He implies that Gay rights was the reason for the rise of Nazism and the Halocaust. It is not recognized as a credible argument by any respected researcher.

Feel free to keep quoting Mr. Lively. He just makes it really easy to discredit you.

Tom in Lazybrook wrote:

<quoted text>
Scott Lively is a halocaust revisionist. He implies that Gay rights was the reason for the rise of Nazism and the Halocaust. It is not recognized as a credible argument by any respected researcher.
Feel free to keep quoting Mr. Lively. He just makes it really easy to discredit you.

Then prove that his book, and its detailed research, "is not recognized as a credible" by mainstream historians (not gay activists). It is you who are discredited, by making bald assertions without any factual support.

Among the many reviewers who praised his book:

“The Pink Swastika is a powerful exposure of pre-World War II Germany and its quest for reviving and imitating a Hellenistic-paganistic idea of homo-eroticism and militarism.” Dr. Mordechai Nisan, Hebrew University of Jerusalem

“A well researched book. The central theme that the Nazi movement was riddled with homosexuals is certainly true.” Hillmar von Campe, Historian, Halle, Germany

You are the revisionist, because you atttempt to refute well-researched factual events without any evidence. You rely only on personal attacks without any factual support. Too typical of the slack-jawed liberal "thinkers" today.

Veritas wrote:

<quoted text>
Then prove that his book, and its detailed research, "is not recognized as a credible" by mainstream historians (not gay activists). It is you who are discredited, by making bald assertions without any factual support.
Among the many reviewers who praised his book:
“The Pink Swastika is a powerful exposure of pre-World War II Germany and its quest for reviving and imitating a Hellenistic-paganistic idea of homo-eroticism and militarism.” Dr. Mordechai Nisan, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
“A well researched book. The central theme that the Nazi movement was riddled with homosexuals is certainly true.” Hillmar von Campe, Historian, Halle, Germany
You are the revisionist, because you atttempt to refute well-researched factual events without any evidence. You rely only on personal attacks without any factual support. Too typical of the slack-jawed liberal "thinkers" today.

Such eminent thinkers. I'm sure they are recognized by experts by the larger Halocaust community with their praise for Lively's implied assertion that Gays were responsible for Halocaust.

You are a Halocaust Revisionist and a crank.

Tom in Lazybrook wrote:

<quoted text>
Such eminent thinkers. I'm sure they are recognized by experts by the larger Halocaust community with their praise for Lively's implied assertion that Gays were responsible for Halocaust.
You are a Halocaust Revisionist and a crank.

Thanks for all the empirical data, research, studies, and quotations from eminent thinkers that you did NOT produce. That demonstrates, better than anything else, who the real crank is. Typical slack-jawed mud-slinging liberal "thinker." Obama must make you proud!

Michael wrote:

<quoted text>
Thanks for all the empirical data, research, studies, and quotations from eminent thinkers that you did NOT produce. That demonstrates, better than anything else, who the real crank is. Typical slack-jawed mud-slinging liberal "thinker." Obama must make you proud!

Lively is a crank. And everyone knows it. How come he got disinvited to the World Congress of Families? Hmmm.

Next up...we're going to get Watchmen on the Walls declared a terrorist group if they are involved in any more violence against Gays.

Seriously, why was Scott Lively not involved in the WCF this year? Why did Lively announce that he was 'deemphisizing' the Gay thing recently? I was quite disappointed that the Watchmen and Lively weren't attending the Amsterdam WCF meeting. It was going to cause much embarrasment to the other attendees. Now I'm not sure if he was disinvited, but he certainly didn't attend. Why not?

Have you considered that his history and writings are so out of bounds (and yes, his apparent central assertion that it was Gay rights supporters that caused Nazism is considered to be crazy by the mainstream Halocaust movement) that even far right anti-Gay groups cannot be associated with him anymore.

So two or three of the 1930's Nazis happened to have Gay sex? So f-ing what? Ted Haggard had Gay sex. Does that mean that the Megachurch movement is all about hiring Gay rentboys to have homosexual sex and snort meth?