Is Sotomayor Anti-Gun?

Armed Veteran wrote:

<quoted text>
People are finally starting to see NObama for exactly what he is...nothing but an empty suit. And you are right about his ratings. They are dropping faster than the prom queen's panties on prom night.

I beg to differ with you Brother. Obozo is not an empty suit. The suit is full of hot, fetid air, kinda like a huge fart.

pulmonary cripple wrote:

<quoted text>
58 percent approve, 35 percent don't. for each person who thinks like you, 2 disagree. that makes you in the marginalized minority.

Flip those numbers around and you will closer to correct.

Wolverine wrote:

<quoted text>I beg to differ with you Brother. Obozo is not an empty suit. The suit is full of hot, fetid air, kinda like a huge fart.

I always thought that is what an empty suit was. No substance, just rancid smelling hot air.

pulmonary cripple wrote:

you're, that is. scopped ya, you can't say anything now ha ha ha ha.

Ahhh... our old friend woodenhead back again, eh.

You all remember her? She's trolled under so many names that topix has almost ran out of opportunities for her.

If she was not anti-gun BO would not have nominated her.

Richard wrote:

If she was not anti-gun BO would not have nominated her.

Sotomayor is a nasty person who hates everything and everyone who is white. She is an ample example of what Obama thinks........and his wife. They are the new face of the new racism and racist in the USA.

Richard wrote:

If she was not anti-gun BO would not have nominated her.

We have a BINGO!!!! Please come forward and collect your winnings.

Here are the facts and cannot be argued.

The "average" person will NOT let you in his or her house with a "gun" unless they trust you. So therefore a "government" that does not "allow" its "people" to have guns unless they are part of the government... DOES NOT TRUST their people. This is not a case of anti-gun. It's anti-rights. It's anti-liberty. And its a symptom of a "lack of trust" by somebody who swore an oath but still does not trust "the people"... Where does that lack of trust come from? Maybe she buys into the idea that "we the people" are all like children that needs a "nanny state" to look over us. Because besides "criminals" the other GROUP that is obvious to adults NOT to trust is kids since they have not learned it yet. So... when she denies YOU your rights to guns... does she see you as a "kid" who needs a parent or a criminal" who needs a warden?

Middle-o-the-strea m wrote:

[——snip for brevity——]So... when she denies YOU your rights to guns... does she see you as a "kid" who needs a parent or a criminal" who needs a warden?

No, it's nothing like that at all.
.
Rather, it has virtually =EVERYTHING= to do with hatred.
.
The illogical and totally irrational hatred of an inanimate object, and the people whom possess such objects.
.
Of course, that works hand-in-hand with her communistic/socialistic/fascis tic political leanings as well, inasmuch that it helps move the U.S. toward the ultimate goals of that end polity.
.
Give the following a read when you get a chance:
.
http://www.wiseupjournal.com/...
.
And this too, which you may download for free or read online:
.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/813216/E-C-Knuth-Th...

If Senator Sessions is rascist because he's from the deep south, then Sosomayor is rascist (towards whites) because she's Puerto Rican and from the upper North.

Infamous Senator Sessions quote:

"I would hope that a wise 'white man' with the richness of his experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a dumb latina female who hasn’t lived that life."

If any WHITE MALE Congressman said that (above quote) his career would be over long before he ever got to interview for any type of political appointment (especially for a position on the U.S Supreme Court.)

Obama and many other liberals have a double standard for rascist comments.

Middle-o-the-strea m wrote:

Here are the facts and cannot be argued.
The "average" person will NOT let you in his or her house with a "gun" unless they trust you.

So if this is a "fact", you'll have no problem with cites to reputable studies including the breakdown that allows you to arrive at an "average" estimation.

Middle-o-the-strea m wrote:

So therefore a "government" that does not "allow" its "people" to have guns unless they are part of the government... DOES NOT TRUST their people.

Their mistrust of the "people" is not just limited to guns.

Probably. SHe is a radical left judge. She will always vote for the minorities, against white, and for anything anti-America.

lassiter wrote:

<quoted text>
So if this is a "fact", you'll have no problem with cites to reputable studies including the breakdown that allows you to arrive at an "average" estimation....

Sure, the American Revolution for one. Then of course there was the Civil War. There have been quite a few other times in American history when it has almost happened again.