Scientists Say Bush Administration Suppressed Research

Didn't Obama just do the SAME THING with Global Warming reports?

Obama = Bush!

Both suck!

Sounds like signs and symptoms of WMDitis and dip'd shiite theoria...

The laughing liberal wrote:

Didn't Obama just do the SAME THING with Global Warming reports?
Obama = Bush!
Both suck!

You are correct. They do suck.
And so do both parties.

Dems = Repubs
Repubs = Dems

Both are out to only make money for themselves. They have proven many times that they DO NOT care about the U.S. taxpayer.

Adrian in Tacoma wrote:

Sounds like signs and symptoms of WMDitis and dip'd shiite theoria...

"Bad intelligence", eh?
Nobody ever acclaimed Bush as a smart guy.
The Bush administration was staunchly opposed to science, civil liberties, Constitutional guarantees and compliance with the law.

Lance Winslow wrote:

<quoted text>"Bad intelligence", eh?
Nobody ever acclaimed Bush as a smart guy.
The Bush administration was staunchly opposed to science, civil liberties, Constitutional guarantees and compliance with the law.

So much for the touted Harvard / Yale / Scull & Crossbones Society - textbook knowledge rarely surpasses common sense...

Just more proof that the last 8 years of the Bush Administration with republicans in control of Congress for 6 of those years really set this nation back in so many ways. I give thanks everyday that Americans came out in record numbers to landslide Obama into the White House. President Obama has a lot of heavy lifting to do to pull this country out of the muck that the republicans sank us into.

I love the flaming hypocrisy of the press and dems here.

All Hail Barak "OBUSH" You wanted change you got the same. 2013 can't come too soon.

So funny how everyone is jumping on board some obscure blog with an anecdotal poll and that is being generous. But then, you clowns never really needed much prodding to march the moron step anyway. In view of the fact that your beloved leaders are never ones to miss a good witch hunt, why did THEY not alert you?

Basically you have two options when it comes to science and politics.

A politician's major goal is to convince as many people as possible that it's philosophies are more logical than any others. They have "the knowledge" and should therefore be the leader of the followers.

A scientist has one required goal, and is also subject to extreme peer review. They can make all the theories and predictions they like, at the end of the day it must be physically proven correct by repeatable testing to carry any real weight.

For a scientist to achieve their little bit of immortality, they must be right. A politicians job may even be harder, they have to make people believe they are right.

Trust my kid to the rhetoric of the Al Gores and Rush Limbaughs of this country? Or the guy that has to actually prove what they claim. I think it would be to our advantage to find a reasonable balance between the two, at the least.

The laughing liberal wrote:

Didn't Obama just do the SAME THING with Global Warming reports?
Obama = Bush!
Both suck!

No, he did not do the same thing. The EPA did not 'suppress' it, and it wasn't science in the first place.

Marine Corp Pat wrote:

Just more proof that the last 8 years of the Bush Administration with republicans in control of Congress for 6 of those years really set this nation back in so many ways. I give thanks everyday that Americans came out in record numbers to landslide Obama into the White House. President Obama has a lot of heavy lifting to do to pull this country out of the muck that the republicans sank us into.

wow ... you're a worse troll than platter...
marine corps .... yeah, right.
sgt. schmuck? or pvt putz?

LMAO!

The laughing liberal wrote:

Didn't Obama just do the SAME THING with Global Warming reports?
Obama = Bush!
Both suck!

BS, Obama does not equal Bush

Anyone who thinks this is simply either not paying attention......

Or

as in your case so self-absorbed in their own preconceptions they are unwilling to learn from observation..........

Tanisha2 wrote:

<quoted text>
You are correct. They do suck.
And so do both parties.
Dems = Repubs
Repubs = Dems
Both are out to only make money for themselves. They have proven many times that they DO NOT care about the U.S. taxpayer.

Once again absolute BS.....when it comes to the Corporation vs. the Individual, the Democrats tend to side with the individual, and Republicans side with the Corporation.

We see this play out time and time again

Health Care
Minimum Wage
the Environment

Republicans also consistantly protect the largest most powerful interest group in the country.....the wealthy.

The earth is 6000 years old and humans played with dino's
Or Noah didn't have room for them in the ark
Oh never mind this is getting too sciencey

SC Guy wrote:

<quoted text>
Once again absolute BS.....when it comes to the Corporation vs. the Individual, the Democrats tend to side with the individual, and Republicans side with the Corporation.
We see this play out time and time again
Health Care
Minimum Wage
the Environment
Republicans also consistantly protect the largest most powerful interest group in the country.....the wealthy.

Spoken like a true tie-dye, dreadlock, earing wearing, foaming at the mouth, "I voted for Nancy Pelosi" Santa Cruzian!

Hmmm wrote:

<quoted text>Spoken like a true tie-dye, dreadlock, earing wearing, foaming at the mouth, "I voted for Nancy Pelosi" Santa Cruzian!

Well it's better than being a Fascist Nazi
Who did you vote for?

mayo420 wrote:

Basically you have two options when it comes to science and politics.
A politician's major goal is to convince as many people as possible that it's philosophies are more logical than any others. They have "the knowledge" and should therefore be the leader of the followers.
A scientist has one required goal, and is also subject to extreme peer review. They can make all the theories and predictions they like, at the end of the day it must be physically proven correct by repeatable testing to carry any real weight.
For a scientist to achieve their little bit of immortality, they must be right. A politicians job may even be harder, they have to make people believe they are right.
Trust my kid to the rhetoric of the Al Gores and Rush Limbaughs of this country? Or the guy that has to actually prove what they claim. I think it would be to our advantage to find a reasonable balance between the two, at the least.

Seems as if modern scientists have one major goal...secure govt. funding by providing study results that fit what a political party wants to hear to promote the interests of their support groups. Yet another example of how everything works worse in a direct proportion as to how much government is involved in it.

GDP wrote:

<quoted text>
Well it's better than being a Fascist Nazi
Who did you vote for?

Actually look up the English translation for the word NAZI. NATIONAL SOCIALIST GERMAN WORKERS PARTY. Socialist huh? Sounds a lot like the Obama administration to me. Incidently, I voted for Ron Paul. Do I need to guess very hard who you voted for?

poor old bush they are blaming him for ever thing,someone told me the other day they were trying to bring him up on charges for nailing christ to the cross.