Officer Acquitted In Off-Duty Shooting Will Return To Duty

Judged:

3

3

1

Mongol Man wrote:

There should have never been a trial in the first place

Judged:

4

3

3

obamessiah wrote:

He shot a young boy...
Regardless of his moms actions does the boy not deserve justice?

Judged:

2

2

2

Lucys_Fur_Coat wrote:

<quoted text>Yes he does and that justice should come from the mom for Child Endangerment! How dumb can you be to get into road rage with your child in the car. CPS should be taking the son away from her. She flipped out and had no concern over the life of her own son, hence RAGE.

Judged:

2

2

2

obamessiah wrote:

He shot a young boy...
Regardless of his moms actions does the boy not deserve justice?

Judged:

3

3

2

obamessiah wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm sorry, but that post does not make any sense

Judged:

1

1

1

Hank wrote:

So I guess as long as your a cop you can carry a weapon and use it whenever you feel someone is a threat the jury must have had an idiot playing with their heads oh poor cop he was in so much danger all he really had to do was drive away and he should have called 911 immediately. All he gets is a slap in on the hand where is the justice just because this woman had priors you really think they had a bias jury considering all the media attention on this case. So citizens of San Diego be careful you might run into an off-duty cop who is trigger happy!!!!

Judged:

1

1

1

Lucys_Fur_Coat wrote:

<quoted text>I'm sorry, I didn't know you were mentally challenged.
See, the MOM had her SON in the CAR when she flipped out. If I had my kids in the car I would have taken the license plate number down and called the CHP. By the way "CHP" is the California Highway Patrol. I would have never acted like such a, well, "YOU" and involved myself in a road rage incident with my child in the car. I would have never followed someone into a parking lot to further escalate the situation with my child in the car. Doing this act with your child in the car is putting the childs life in danger. This is called Child Endangerment and this is what the mom needs to be charged with and the child taken away.
This mother, like yourself, is MENTALLY CHALLENGED!
Does that make sense to you?

Judged:

2

2

1

Lucys_Fur_Coat wrote:

<quoted text>I'm sorry, I didn't know you were mentally challenged.
See, the MOM had her SON in the CAR when she flipped out. If I had my kids in the car I would have taken the license plate number down and called the CHP. By the way "CHP" is the California Highway Patrol. I would have never acted like such a, well, "YOU" and involved myself in a road rage incident with my child in the car. I would have never followed someone into a parking lot to further escalate the situation with my child in the car. Doing this act with your child in the car is putting the childs life in danger. This is called Child Endangerment and this is what the mom needs to be charged with and the child taken away.
This mother, like yourself, is MENTALLY CHALLENGED!
Does that make sense to you?

Judged:

1

1

justinstar wrote:

<quoted text>Thank you.

Judged:

1

1

1

obamessiah wrote:

<quoted text>'
well you are not on drugs i hope like the mom was. AND SHE WAS CONVICTED
Where is the boys justice???

Judged:

1

1

obamessiah wrote:

Poor kid, oh well guess with the majority of society like you, he's kind of screwed.
Me on the other hand, an "officer" of the law ever tries pulling this stunt with me and I'll blow his head off with my .45

Judged:

1

1

1

obamessiah wrote:

Poor kid, oh well guess with the majority of society like you, he's kind of screwed.
Me on the other hand, an "officer" of the law ever tries pulling this stunt with me and I'll blow his head off with my .45