Atheists' problem with the Bible

Judged:

2

2

1

kjerstie001 wrote:

Lot and his daughters........enough said.

Judged:

2

2

2

Samson wrote:

If you want a story where everyone does everything right then read Bambi. Real life includes the sinful nature of man and is not pretty. The bible is a book of truth therefore the good and the bad has to both be told.

Judged:

4

1

1

Leonine wrote:

The story of Lot and his daughters is just proof that females are expendable in the eyes of Christians. Not that I would condone the rape of an angel, mind, but offering up one's own daughters as fodder and then having biblical "history" make light of the violation as if it's perfectly all right only reinforces the image that Christianity sees women as a whole as expendable creatures to be used.

Judged:

3

2

2

kjerstie001 wrote:

<quoted text>
We also forget not that according to the bible, women who are raped must marry their rapists.

Judged:

3

2

2

Samson wrote:

If you want a story where everyone does everything right then read Bambi. Real life includes the sinful nature of man and is not pretty. The bible is a book of truth therefore the good and the bad has to both be told.

Judged:

2

2

1

Bitner wrote:

<quoted text>
"Book of truth"? No, a book of mythology, relevant only to those who are Christian. It is also not binding on anyone else, and shouldn't be quoted as though it is.
Just have to love the way some use it to condemn a woman's right to choose, when nowhere in that 'book of truth' does it say that a woman cannot choose to end her own pregnancy. Nowhere.
Nope, not even the commandments. The original commandments, given by Yahweh to the Jews, stated though shalt not murder, not kill. And at the time it was written, the unborn was not even considered a life. Life began with first breath. To say it was a sin to kill would be stupid, as we kill all the time. In fact, Yahweh ORDERED his followers to kill, sometimes whole towns which INCLUDED those fetuses you people seem to think he finds so important.
Obviously, the commandment doesn't apply to the unborn no matter which version you use, the original, or the Christian misinterpretation.
So, again, there is nothing in the bible that says a woman cannot choose to end her own pregnancy.

Judged:

3

1

1

kjerstie001 wrote:

<quoted text>
We also forget not that according to the bible, women who are raped must marry their rapists.

Judged:

1

1

1

Divine Alien wrote:

<quoted text>
If you don't believe in God, you are not the breed of a human created by God!

Judged:

3

3

Samson wrote:

If you want a story where everyone does everything right then read Bambi. Real life includes the sinful nature of man and is not pretty. The bible is a book of truth therefore the good and the bad has to both be told.

Judged:

1

1

1

Bitner wrote:

<quoted text>
When did I say I didn't? We're discussing the bible, not Deity. There's no need to deflect just because you cannot answer my points.

Judged:

1

1

1

Leonine wrote:

When they can call their hateful "god" down to speak for himself, I might consider following him...but only if he gives me reason to believe I'm truly inferior due to my gender. Until then, Christians can keep their souls and their worries and their ISSUES to themselves and keep them the fuck off my body, thank you.

Judged:

1

1

1

Divine Alien wrote:

<quoted text>
Sorrrrry I am out of topic. One may fack and fack until the belly bulging many times and terminate the fetus inside anytime if not wanted. It would such a pity for the fetus which has just inherited the soul of its' mom.

Judged:

1

1

1

Samson wrote:

If you want a story where everyone does everything right then read Bambi. Real life includes the sinful nature of man and is not pretty. The bible is a book of truth therefore the good and the bad has to both be told.

Judged:

1

1

1

Leonine wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm sorry, but what the hell does that even mean? People don't get knocked up from "facking" and there's usually a male involved in conception. Do you think women reproduce asexually or something?