More Businesses Are Paying the Price

One of the things that the Federal Government is supposed to do is control immigration and over the last couple of years a great deal of hot air (let’s hope it wasn’t greenhouse gases) has come out of Washington on the subject. However, aside from a mix of photo-op posturing, disingenuous calls for action and whining platitudes, very little was accomplished other than tweaking the vocabulary to turn “illegal alien” into the more PC-compatible “undocumented worker.” I am sorry to say this Nancy, Harry, Ted, Gavin; these people are not”undocumented workers” they are, in point of fact, “illegal aliens.” They came into the country illegally, they are working illegally; they are criminals and now, in an effort to keep Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) off their trail, they are making things worse by stealing the identities of American citizens!

[Agent of Chaos]

ICE Mutual Agreement between Government and Employers (IMAGE) program.
http://www.ice.gov/partners/opaimage/index.ht...

[Not Right]

It's going to take someone in our Federal government losing their ID to an illegal, before D.C. wakes up........until then innocent victims who have to just "deal with it" are being abandoned.

[Indyeast]

Agent of Chaos wrote:

ICE Mutual Agreement between Government and Employers (IMAGE) program.
http://www.ice.gov/partners/opaimage/index.ht...

Good information.

[whitehair]

Unfortunately,All that is being done is water down the system. More hot air out of Washington.

Apparrently ICE has finally gotten a message to check the illegals but we need to get rid of them and not allow them back by closing our Borders and having an immigration system that works.None of our Congress nor the two front runners for President will do this.

[Box of Chocolates]

Indyeast wrote:

<quoted text>
Good information.

Stop spamming the boards!

[Diane D]

whitehair wrote:

Unfortunately,All that is being done is water down the system. More hot air out of Washington.
Apparrently ICE has finally gotten a message to check the illegals but we need to get rid of them and not allow them back by closing our Borders and having an immigration system that works.None of our Congress nor the two front runners for President will do this.

I agree with you but think what do you get when you add heat to water...steam... We want all illegals gone and we are creating steam,we will not accept amnesty.

[what]

Diane D wrote:

<quoted text>
I agree with you but think what do you get when you add heat to water...steam... We want all illegals gone and we are creating steam,we will not accept amnesty.

But apparently we'll accept Patriot Acts, costly wars based on false premise and sending the bulk of our economy to Communist countries with questionable human rights records.

Tell me this much, if we get into it again with Russia can we wear "Kill a Commie for Mommy" T-shirts this time or will we just look like hypocritical jackasses for doing so?

[cudzuqueen]

what wrote:

<quoted text>
But apparently we'll accept Patriot Acts, costly wars based on false premise and sending the bulk of our economy to Communist countries with questionable human rights records.
Tell me this much, if we get into it again with Russia can we wear "Kill a Commie for Mommy" T-shirts this time or will we just look like hypocritical jackasses for doing so?

In case you missed it read about the 550 metric tons of YELLOWCAKE URANIUM that has been secretly held in obeyance until it could be shipped out of Iraq. The link below is from the CNN website so that you may verify the veracity of this story. http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/07/07/iraq.uranium...

Now what?

[Paul the American]

what wrote:

<quoted text>
But apparently we'll accept Patriot Acts, costly wars based on false premise and sending the bulk of our economy to Communist countries with questionable human rights records.
Tell me this much, if we get into it again with Russia can we wear "Kill a Commie for Mommy" T-shirts this time or will we just look like hypocritical jackasses for doing so?

"war based on false premise"? Do you think we went into Iraq looking for WMD's? If you do, you're dumber than I thought.

Quick history lesson: After Gulf War I in 1990/1991, Saddam signed a cease fire which stated he would allow UN weapons inspectors into the country. Then he thwarted those inspectors. The UN passed SEVENTEEN resolutions trying to get the inspectors back into Iraq in accordance with the ceasefire.

WE INVADED IRAQ NOT LOOKING FOR WMD's, BUT TO ENFORCE THE 1991 CEASEFIRE!

[Infidel in the HATEland]

Box of Chocolates wrote:

<quoted text>Stop spamming the boards!

Deport yourself now, because you never know what you're gonna get staying here.

[Cathie]

Box of Chocolates wrote:

<quoted text>Stop spamming the boards!

You are one stupid Mexican!

[what]

Paul the American wrote:

<quoted text>
"war based on false premise"? Do you think we went into Iraq looking for WMD's? If you do, you're dumber than I thought.
Quick history lesson: After Gulf War I in 1990/1991, Saddam signed a cease fire which stated he would allow UN weapons inspectors into the country. Then he thwarted those inspectors. The UN passed SEVENTEEN resolutions trying to get the inspectors back into Iraq in accordance with the ceasefire.
WE INVADED IRAQ NOT LOOKING FOR WMD's, BUT TO ENFORCE THE 1991 CEASEFIRE!

And it's sooo worth all those billions isn't it?

Here's a clue: Don't put jackasses like that in power to begin with and you may save some money down the road.

China won't let us in there either to see what they're up to, so when are we invading? Much bigger threat than Iraq ever thought of being. Yet - nothing. Oh except let's give them our economy.

Yeah, really worried about possible threats. BULLS*IT!

[what]

cudzuqueen wrote:

<quoted text>
In case you missed it read about the 550 metric tons of YELLOWCAKE URANIUM that has been secretly held in obeyance until it could be shipped out of Iraq. The link below is from the CNN website so that you may verify the veracity of this story. http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/07/07/iraq.uranium...
Now what?

It tells me you swallow without question every piece of news info given to you. I've heard from many overseas on various issues give a "wtf" to our news reports on many subjects.

Media is bought and sold here. It's why they'd rather keep you in the dark with yet another K-Fed Brit newsline.

Did they also happen to report about the chemical technologies that were still being furnished by us when Saddam gassed the Kurds? Hmm? Any mention of that lil blunder or did we get in there soon enough to shut him up?

We freaking loved Iraq because they hated Iran.

[what]

Even the people we "liberated" want us the f**k out.

http://www.topix.net/content/ap/2008/08/iraq-...

[what]

http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/07/07/iraq.uranium...

And that crap has been just sitting there KNOWN ABOUT from both sides. Removed as a precaution. Not hardly a mass billions cash effort needed there.

[plopsdad]

what wrote:

http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/07/ 07/iraq.uranium/
And that crap has been just sitting there KNOWN ABOUT from both sides. Removed as a precaution. Not hardly a mass billions cash effort needed there.

And this has to do with illegal immigration is what way?

[what]

plopsdad wrote:

<quoted text>And this has to do with illegal immigration is what way?

Why don't you ask Paul?

[Paul the American]

[QUOTE who="what the dumba$$"]<quoted text>
And it's sooo worth all those billions isn't it?
Here's a clue: Don't put jackasses like that in power to begin with and you may save some money down the road.
China won't let us in there either to see what they're up to, so when are we invading? Much bigger threat than Iraq ever thought of being. Yet - nothing. Oh except let's give them our economy.
Yeah, really worried about possible threats. BULLS*IT![/QUOTE]

Yes, it is worht all the billions. It is money much better spent than on ILLEGAL COCKROACHES. It showed the world that the US will still get the job done when Russia, France, and China were doing backdoor deals with Saddam and c0ckbl0cking us in the United Nations.

We'll never invade China with ground troops, but we are already in an economic war with them. Besides... we're going to be busy with Iran before GWB (the decider) leaves office.

[Paul the American]

what wrote:

<quoted text>
Why don't you ask Paul?

YOU brought up the war in post #8. Since I was there and you have been brainwashed by CNN, I had to respond.

[what]

Paul the American wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes, it is worht all the billions. It is money much better spent than on ILLEGAL COCKROACHES. It showed the world that the US will still get the job done when Russia, France, and China were doing backdoor deals with Saddam and c0ckbl0cking us in the United Nations.
We'll never invade China with ground troops, but we are already in an economic war with them. Besides... we're going to be busy with Iran before GWB (the decider) leaves office.

LMAO what economic war? It's really quite simple actually. We buy their crap that is made from our companies who left us out to dry for greener profit pastures or else they invest in the Euro and we sink.