Mohammed depiction stirs controversy in new film

from dailycardinal:

"Believe it or not, despite the fact that people like Salman Rushdie have been forced into exile in the past for writing negative things about Islam, people have already made films about Mohammad. Back in 1976,'The Message' tried to delicately deal with the story of the prophet. Starring Anthony Quinn ('Lawrence of Arabia'), the film presented Islam in a good light and never explicitly showed Mohammad, either representing him with gentle organ music or point-of-view shots meant to be from his perspective.

"Critics praised the portrayal as a happy medium, but the film was violently protested anyway, resulting in the death of two people. Extremists threatened to bomb a Muslim religious center in Washington, D.C. if they did not get the American premiere of the film cancelled. Foolishly enough, most of the protests actually originated from the misconception that Quinn himself was playing Mohammad, showing how religious zeal and misinformation can be a deadly combo."

There is no doubt in my mind that Mo will be protrayed as a model for all humanity.

His sex with a child and slaves will not be addressed.

Likewise his plunder, rape, murder, slaving, etc will be ignored.

If at balanced protrail is give, the peaceful muslims will start killing people.

the salman rushdie thing was riduclous i read that one sentence in the book t wasn'y slanderous or insultin it referred to mohammed in just two words that all the book wasn'y about mohhamed.The fact that two harmless words put a mans life in danger shows how stupid muuslim are.For gods sake get over it.

victoria wrote:

the salman rushdie thing was riduclous i read that one sentence in the book t wasn'y slanderous or insultin it referred to mohammed in just two words that all the book wasn'y about mohhamed.The fact that two harmless words put a mans life in danger shows how stupid muuslim are.For gods sake get over it.

you mean for Allah's sake?

Wilberhum wrote:

There is no doubt in my mind that Mo will be protrayed as a model for all humanity.
His sex with a child and slaves will not be addressed.
Likewise his plunder, rape, murder, slaving, etc will be ignored.
If at balanced protrail is give, the peaceful muslims will start killing people.

for some obvious reason i knew i'd see your post here.shows how smart a man in his mid 40's is when they accuse a 7th century man of pedophilia.just curious,dou you know what 7th century is?you always refuse to answer my questions because you know of the humiliation you will bring upon yourself.tell me which one of your christian prophets prohibited slavery?right there in the bible it tells us how to deal with slaves,tell me how many of those prophets didnt murder?rape?the bible tells us that Moses was orderd to let his army keep to themselves all the virin girls.i saw a movie about Moses,i saw nothing about the plundering,rapeing,killing and slaving that was ordered by him.why is that?i bet a christ-like person like you thinks it's o.k because you are suppose to believe in Moses right?

"If at balanced protrail is give"

you have never given a "balanced portrait",you are just a bigoted christian who wants to play atheist on the net.i'm guessing you are a minister who's members are running out your church and you have too much time and anger in you.stop embarraeing atheism and represent the crap you bow down to.

DARWINS-SON wrote:

<quoted text>
for some obvious reason i knew i'd see your post here.shows how smart a man in his mid 40's is when they accuse a 7th century man of pedophilia.just curious,dou you know what 7th century is?you always refuse to answer my questions because you know of the humiliation you will bring upon yourself.tell me which one of your christian prophets prohibited slavery?right there in the bible it tells us how to deal with slaves,tell me how many of those prophets didnt murder?rape?the bible tells us that Moses was orderd to let his army keep to themselves all the virin girls.i saw a movie about Moses,i saw nothing about the plundering,rapeing,killing and slaving that was ordered by him.why is that?i bet a christ-like person like you thinks it's o.k because you are suppose to believe in Moses right?
"If at balanced protrail is give"
you have never given a "balanced portrait",you are just a bigoted christian who wants to play atheist on the net.i'm guessing you are a minister who's members are running out your church and you have too much time and anger in you.stop embarraeing atheism and represent the crap you bow down to.

Not in my 40's and not Christian. Those and all your other assumptions are wrong.

Wilberhum wrote:

<quoted text>
Not in my 40's and not Christian. Those and all your other assumptions are wrong.

are you telling me the bible doesnt mention rape,plundering,murder,slavery etc ordered and done by prophets like Moses,David Joshua etc?i see no huge difference between Mohammad and these men but you do,thats why i know you are a christian.many were killed by the orders of god himself in the bible but i bet you look at that as something that is real murder.you are the worse kind of bigoted hypocrite.did you have a problem with the rapeing,plundering,slavery,kil ling etc done by your prophets when you "were christian"?why didnt you label your prophets David,Moses,Joshua and the others murderers,rapists,slavers,plun deres?you still managed to doge my qustions in the previous post.if you are not in your 40's then i know for a fact you past your 40's.

DARWINS-SON wrote:

<quoted text>
are you telling me the bible doesnt mention rape,plundering,murder,slavery etc ordered and done by prophets like Moses,David Joshua etc?i see no huge difference between Mohammad and these men but you do,thats why i know you are a christian.many were killed by the orders of god himself in the bible but i bet you look at that as something that is real murder.you are the worse kind of bigoted hypocrite.did you have a problem with the rapeing,plundering,slavery,kil ling etc done by your prophets when you "were christian"?why didnt you label your prophets David,Moses,Joshua and the others murderers,rapists,slavers,plun deres?you still managed to doge my qustions in the previous post.if you are not in your 40's then i know for a fact you past your 40's.

I'm not telling you any thing about the Bible.
Damn, you just don't get it.

Why are you trying to use evil to justify evil?

DARWINS-SON wrote:

<quoted text>
are you telling me the bible doesnt mention rape,plundering,murder,slavery etc ordered and done by prophets like Moses,David Joshua etc?i see no huge difference between Mohammad and these men but you do,thats why i know you are a christian.many were killed by the orders of god himself in the bible but i bet you look at that as something that is real murder.you are the worse kind of bigoted hypocrite.did you have a problem with the rapeing,plundering,slavery,kil ling etc done by your prophets when you "were christian"?why didnt you label your prophets David,Moses,Joshua and the others murderers,rapists,slavers,plun deres?you still managed to doge my qustions in the previous post.if you are not in your 40's then i know for a fact you past your 40's.

I know perhaps Mo learn idea of to kill ex-believer from Moses.

multi kultural wrote:

<quoted text>
I know perhaps Mo learn idea of to kill ex-believer from Moses.

he got it from Moses,Joshua,Solomon,the bible,the Torah his era etc.people like wiberhum are nothing but a bunch of pansy hypocrites.

DARWINS-SON wrote:

<quoted text>
he got it from Moses,Joshua,Solomon,the bible,the Torah his era etc.people like wiberhum are nothing but a bunch of pansy hypocrites.

Using your logic I could justify the Rwandan Genocide by stating that the Holocaust actually happened.

Wilberhum wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm not telling you any thing about the Bible.
Damn, you just don't get it.
Why are you trying to use evil to justify evil?

why wont you tell me anything about the bible?because you will be offending yourself?i get it all,you are a BIGOT!HYPOCRITE AND A CHRISTIAN IN DENIAL!you glorified and accepted the murder,rape,slavery,plundering etc that exists in the bible but call somebody who you accuse of doing the same names.i'm not justifying evil with evil,i'm proveing you are a bigot and an insecure hypocrite.what made you worship the murder,rape,slavery,plunder,in cest when you "were a christian" but despise a man you accuse of doing what you worship?no man with sense of just will see much of a difference between Mohammad,Moses,Joshua,Solomon, David etc,only a person with a propaganda and blind eye will see a wide gap between them.what makes those guys that you worship any different than Mohammad?why are they excused from your name calling and earned your worship even though they were much alike?you once said Mohammad isnt a man of "god",well god in the bible killed numerous and wiped out cities so what makes Mohammad not a man of "god"?Moses and the others were men of "god" and they did the same.what gave them the right sir?the bible and your belief?i bet so.

Wilberhum wrote:

<quoted text>
Using your logic I could justify the Rwandan Genocide by stating that the Holocaust actually happened.

more proof that you are a closet christian.it is not about justification,it's about not being a hypocritical lying bigot!

DARWINS-SON wrote:

<quoted text>
more proof that you are a closet christian.it is not about justification,it's about not being a hypocritical lying bigot!

"Ad homium attacks are the last resort of the intellectually bankrupt"
- Huxley

Sasha Baron Cohen will make a good Mohammad.

Wilberhum wrote:

<quoted text>
"Ad homium attacks are the last resort of the intellectually bankrupt"
- Huxley

that quote is meant for yourself sir.nobody spits more insults and attacks than you,but offcourse nobody spends more time on this forum than you neither.not even the muslims.the pathetic thing about you is your attitude towards a man who lived in the 7th century that you dont even know ever existed.

Sound Doctrine wrote:

Sasha Baron Cohen will make a good Mohammad.

didnt that person play Jesus in a doumentary once?

DARWINS-SON wrote:

<quoted text>
that quote is meant for yourself sir.nobody spits more insults and attacks than you,but offcourse nobody spends more time on this forum than you neither.not even the muslims.the pathetic thing about you is your attitude towards a man who lived in the 7th century that you dont even know ever existed.

Thanks for proving my point.

Muhammad had sex with a child.
- So attack Wilber.
Muhammad had sex with slaves.
- So attack Wilber.
Muhammad murdered unarmed captives.
- So attack Wilber.
Muhammad created, used, and sold slaves.
- So attack Wilber.
Muhammad tortured men.
- So attack Wilber.
Muhammad was a caravan robber.
- So attack Wilber.
Muhammad plundered almost all Jewish property
- So attack Wilber.
I think I’m beginning to see Darwins-Son pattern here.

Wilberhum wrote:

<quoted text>
Thanks for proving my point.

i'm guessing you run out.the post and the quote had no relation at all,your understanding of the quote is as good as a normal person's understanding of the bible.