Send a Message
to the seer

Comments

2

Joined

Mar 21, 2012

the seer Profile

Forums Owned

Recent Posts

Wyoming, MI

Obama-Economy - Wyoming, MI

Exactly what is he trying? How much more should he tax and redistribute through bureaucracy. How many more trillions in debt should we go so Obama can make life "better" . How many more bureaucracies that cost billions and billions every year should be created to permanently cripple the economy - you know, the thing that "provides " the gov't with the money to pay for people's bills/food/housing /clothing/educatio n/security/infrast ructure? Nice try on the class warfare trick. If the republicans consisted of only the rich, they would have zero reps in congress. Some of us middle class are concerned that this debt is actually an issue. The gov't has subsidized responsibility down to nearly nothing. You can drop out of high school, never work, get chicks pregnant and never raise those kids, go to prison for committing a felony, and the gov't will still pay for your food, clothing, shelter...and treat you as though you're the poor victim. Take a look at these figures in the site below. You may learn something, along with every one else that thinks the rich are not paying their "fair share". "Raise taxes on those nasty rich". Pah-lease. I know a rich woman. Just over 200k/year. She works 70 hrs/week and deals with more stress, pressure, and deadlines everyday than you could imagine. That's how you get rich. Her taxes are obscene. http://ntu.org/tax -basics/who-pays-i ncome-taxes.html  (Mar 21, 2012 | post #2)

Wyoming, MI

Obama's daughter spends spring break in Mexico

Oh dear...it's called projection: In Freudian psychology, Psychological projection or projection bias is a psychological defense mechanism where a person unconsciously denies their own attributes, thoughts, and emotions, which are then ascribed to the outside world, such as to the weather, a tool, or to other people. Dude, you're the hater. There's an easy way out of this. Just be objective. If someone is wrong, simply explain why. Or, just ignore it. You'll have the exact same impact on that person with either response; just as you did with your initial response - none. NO ONE with politically charged feelings sees accurately. One side is seen favorably, one is seen negatively. Excuses and defenses are made for one side, and an over reaction attacks are made for the other. I've followed politics for decades. The same people that complain about one thing for one administration (D or R) defend it for the other one (R or D). Stats, exagerated discrepancies, quotes...all used as "proofs" to attack. But a twist (sometimes no twist at all) on the same "proofs" are used to defend when their guy is in office. Without failure - every time a new party is in office. It's become commical.  (Mar 21, 2012 | post #37)