Recent Posts
It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...
Hoping that people who read their review would improve their knowledge is NOT the same as hoping the data was correct. It would seem that the author's hope was lost on you. If you want to dismiss research data provided by ~100 scientists over a period of ~20 yrs - that is up to you. Just don't expect everyone else to. http://igg.cas.cn/ xwzx/yjcg/201003/W 020100310663431381 791.pdfNo need to hope about data when there is more than enough to show that there was no holocene global flood. No global flood data No global flood (Oct 6, 2012 | post #99476)
It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...
The difference between an evolutionist and an anti-evolutionist: EvolutionistAnti-e volutionist (Oct 6, 2012 | post #99475)
It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...
A global flood. (Oct 6, 2012 | post #99474)
It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...
Sure it does. I kept asking you the same question over and over not b/c of lack of understanding on my part, but b/c I knew you would overreact and show the beligerent/bullyin g/hostile side of your personality. And that is exactly what you did, as evidenced again in your post above. A real teacher of children would not have responded in such a manner. Now, what were you saying about control/manipulati on??? (Oct 6, 2012 | post #99473)
It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...
Excellent point! Furthermore, there wouldn't even be an earth/solar system w/o the sun as the sun would not have provided the gravitational influence needed for the planets to coalesce. http://www.quora.c om/Astronomy/If-th ere-were-no-sun-ap proximately-what-t emperature-would-t he-Earth-beActuall y, some of the vascular seed bearing plants would have been around during the time of early animal evolution e.g., cycads, ginko, conifers, ferns, mosses and liverworts. http://en.wikipedi a.org/wiki/Spermat ophyte But there wouldn't have been any "angiosperms " - plants which evolved the ability to produce flowers and "enclosed " seeds - until 130 mya. (Genesis 1:11-12 refers to angiosperms as fruit trees, having them appear before, and not after, land animal creation, contradicting the fossil record.) http://en.wikipedi a.org/wiki/Timelin e_of_evolutionary_ history_of_life (Oct 6, 2012 | post #99471)
It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...
What escapes my notice? Is it when you 1. hide behind your one year resolution smokescreen when the data contradicts your make believe flood story, but dismiss this objection when you think the data supports your story? Nope, that didn't escape my notice. -or- 2. stated that other crater lakes corroborated the Canadian lake erosion sedimentary layer 4200 ybp, when in fact, no such data was presented? Nope that didn't escape my notice -or- 3. claimed to have "global" evidence, but only presented one reference on alluvial flooding which covered 3 flooding events in ONE location (the Sonoran desert near Phoenix) 4100 ybp? This one didn't escape my notice either. So what exactly escapes my notice? No global flood data No global flood (Oct 6, 2012 | post #99466)
It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...
Did the rain follow the anteaters all the way back to S. America? How much rain do you suppose it would have taken to de-salinate all the groundwater, streams, rivers and lakes? However much rain it may have been - it wasn't enough to de-salinate the Black Sea, which used to be a fresh water lake. (Oct 5, 2012 | post #99370)
It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...
To bad for you that none of the data in Kong's reference confirmed a bottleneck population size of 3 females @ 4500 ybp, or any other time frame for that matter. http://en.wikipedi a.org/wiki/Toba_ca tastrophe_theory (Oct 5, 2012 | post #99362)
It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...
Dogen used the wikipedia entry on human evolution. So if wikipedia is correct, then Dogen would be correct. http://en.wikipedi a.org/wiki/Human_e volution Thanks for confirming human evolution is correct!! (Oct 5, 2012 | post #99361)
It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...
You have a definite anger control issue. You have no business teaching children anythingNo you haven't. Please provide the post where you wrote: "No one can be certain about the existence of JesusThen why can't you say/write these words: "We cannot be certain about the existence of Jesus." If memory serves, you argued to Dogen one time that you could conclusively prove the resurrection. Isn't that contradicting your "no historical certainty" principle? (Oct 4, 2012 | post #99241)
It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...
Yes it does. Time scale resolution does not make evidence disappear. No global data No global flood (Oct 4, 2012 | post #99237)
It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...
Have what? A make believe flood? Do you have any data to go with your fantasy here Mr DataI guess I missed that description in the paper. Can you provide the actual quote about a flood overtopping the crater rim? To bad you can't corroborate this finding in other crater lakes like the Mbalang, where nothing but a "monotonous sedimentation interpreted as a relatively dry phase" was found between 2000 and 7000 ybp. http://hol.sagepub .com/content/22/1/ 31.abstract That you can't corroborate this finding, would mean the Canadian crater lake sedimentation @ 4200 ybp would be a regional phenomenon. No global flood data No global flood (Oct 4, 2012 | post #99235)
It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...
To bad you don't have the data. (Oct 4, 2012 | post #99231)
It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...
You apparently will never learn that time scale resolution does not make sedimentary evidence disappear. A core is continuous, reflecting the entire sedimentary record throughout the entire length of a core. Sediments in the 7 Chinese desert cores (and the aeolian/lacustrine sediments of the 6 lakes) revealed NO common wet period throughout the entire holocene. This is convincing evidence that a global flood never happened. You apparently will also never learn that short term floods leave behind recognizable sedimentation, let alone a flood that lasted a year. http://en.wikipedi a.org/wiki/Black_S ea_deluge_hypothes is http://www.whoi.ed u/science/GG/coast al/publications/pd fs/Woodruff%20et%2 0al%202009%20Japan .pdf http://geology.gsa pubs.org/content/3 6/5/391.abstract http://www.geochro nometria.pl/pdf/ge o_37/Geo37_07.pdf http://onlinelibra ry.wiley.com/doi/1 0.1002/97814443042 99.ch3/summary http://bulletin.ge oscienceworld.org/ content/119/9-10/1 120.short http://www.climate geology.ethz.ch/pe ople/wirths/Wirth_ etal_2011_LakeThun No global flood data No global flood (Oct 4, 2012 | post #99230)
It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...
You really need to read Margulis and Sagan's book - "Acquiring Genomes. (Oct 4, 2012 | post #99227)
Copyright ©2013 Topix LLC
