Send a Message
to Sam Lowree

Comments

5,940

Joined

Jan 22, 2008

Sam Lowree Profile

Recent Posts

Chico, CA

Does :GRANDPA NICOLAI" post under more than 1 screen name?

I think that the ole Comrade is actually a conservative acting as a leftie. He posts the drivel that he does to show us how ridiculous the left really is. He makes use of these forums to prove the idiocy of the left.  (Apr 3, 2014 | post #6)

Chico, CA

"Global warmist" experts stuck in polar ice

Even the New York Times is not buying into all the AGW hype. "In short, the drought gripping California has been observed before. And it has occurred principally because of a lack of rain, not principally because of warmer temperatures. Indeed, it should be quite familiar to anyone who lived in California in the mid-1970s, as I did. We can also say with high confidence that no appreciable trend toward either wetter or drier conditions has been observed for statewide average precipitation since 1895. This drought is not part of a long-term drift toward reduced precipitation over the state." http://www.nytimes .com/2014/03/09/op inion/sunday/globa l-warming-not-alwa ys.html?ref=opinio n&_r=2  (Mar 12, 2014 | post #630)

Chico, CA

"Global warmist" experts stuck in polar ice

So the people's TV network can be bought off. How interesting.  (Mar 1, 2014 | post #621)

Chico, CA

Desperation: Obama alters Obamacare again

In effect, since it is tax payer money paying for the infrastructure projects, we are paying the wages as well as the workers taxesWorld War II did not stimulate the economy nor did it end the Great Depression. Rationing during the war in almost all areas of consumer goods is hardly and economic recovery. http://www.forbes. com/sites/peterfer rara/2013/11/30/th e-great-depression -was-ended-by-the- end-of-world-war-i i-not-the-start-of -it/  (Mar 1, 2014 | post #110)

Chico, CA

"Global warmist" experts stuck in polar ice

How much do the Koch brothers donate to conservative think tanks? I didn't know that Nova on PBS was a conservative think tank.  (Mar 1, 2014 | post #607)

Chico, CA

"Global warmist" experts stuck in polar ice

Their belief in AGW has become a religion to them. They don't look at the facts, they believe what their high priests of AGW alarmism are telling them without question. These AGW alarmist believers on this forum blame the ills of the world on the Koch brothers yet when it comes to financing political campaigns the Koch brothers are far behind the government unions. Ignorance is bliss for the likes of TP and the Ole Marxist. TP will at least, although feebly, attempt to engage while the old Marxist is merely a contrarian.  (Feb 28, 2014 | post #603)

Chico, CA

"Global warmist" experts stuck in polar ice

Everywhere? Considering the Great Lakes are almost entirely frozen over I don't think so. So what if we have a warm, dry spell here in California, that is the norm after all. It is you AGW alarmists who go on about "weather is local, climate is global". The global trend is cooling.  (Feb 27, 2014 | post #597)

Chico, CA

"Global warmist" experts stuck in polar ice

Even so. 97% of 3000 is not 97% of all scientists. 3000 is a small number, most of those scientists were in the U.S. where government funding is king. You loose your government funding and you are out of work.  (Feb 27, 2014 | post #596)

Chico, CA

"Global warmist" experts stuck in polar ice

Where is that occurring? http://www.edmonto njournal.com/weath er/index.html?city =edmonton&rg=a b  (Feb 27, 2014 | post #592)

Chico, CA

"Global warmist" experts stuck in polar ice

Of course too much of anything is bad. Even though water is essential for life if you drink too much you will die. We are not putting too much CO2 into the atmosphere. The planet is doing fine. After all, we continue to put ever increasing amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere and the planet is cooling. The latest cooling trend is now longer that the last warming trend. CO2 is not the culprit. There is not consensus on AGW. The 97% number you alarmists keep tossing about is of course skewed. From the study: http://tigger.uic. edu/~pdoran/012009 _Doran_final.pdf -10, 257 scientists were invited to participate. -3146 scientists participated. -Of those remaining only 79 were considered specialists and of those specialists 77 answered in the positive to the two questions posed. Q1: “When compared with pre-1800s levels, do you think that mean global temperatures have generally risen, fallen, or remained relatively constant?” 76 of 79 (96.2%) answered “risen.” Q2: “Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures?” 75 of 77 (97.4%) answered “yes.” So 76 people out of over 10,000 equals 97%. At least these results are better than what the climate models are getting.  (Feb 27, 2014 | post #590)

Chico, CA

"Global warmist" experts stuck in polar ice

Global warming is a good thing. More CO2 is great for our crops, rain forests, etc. Plus, more people freeze to death than die in the heat.  (Feb 26, 2014 | post #587)

Chico, CA

"Global warmist" experts stuck in polar ice

They did skew the data to get the results they wanted. This entire AGW scam is all about power. The environmentalists despise the freedoms that we enjoy. Only a scientist afraid of being found out to be a fraud would ever say that the science is settled. Science is never settled. Newtons laws were thought to be the absolute for over 200 years until Einstein came along. Just as with the ban on DDT the AGW alarmism is not based on reality.  (Feb 23, 2014 | post #559)

Chico, CA

"Global warmist" experts stuck in polar ice

So I am supposed to believe an environmentalist opinion over that of an accredited climate scientist who was a lead author of the IPCC report? That is understandable since your position on AGW is based on belief rather than empirical evidence.  (Feb 23, 2014 | post #553)

Chico, CA

"Global warmist" experts stuck in polar ice

Really? There are no climate scientists involved in that site. One has a PhD in solar physics, he would be the closest to being credible. I know that this is the favourite site of you and TP but maybe you should try advancing your education a bit by expanding your reading material.  (Feb 23, 2014 | post #551)

Chico, CA

"Global warmist" experts stuck in polar ice

No where in your post do I see an argument against the studies that Lindzen has done, against the science. All you and ole comrade ever do is attack the person, and very poorly at that. Lindzen's point about him being on the government's payroll is that by speaking out against AGW alarmism he has a good chance at losing his pay cheque but is doing so regardless. Now did Lindzen defend tobacco sales and endorse a brand of tobacco? When Lindzen says that the science is non conclusive when it comes to cigarette smoking and cancer is he referring to second hand smoke or an individual who lights up? Here are a few of Lindzen's scientific works: http://www-eaps.mi t.edu/faculty/lind zen/230-Rondanelli .pdf http://www-eaps.mi t.edu/faculty/lind zen/238-Choi2010AA S.pdf Peruse them and get back to me. After reading them I would like your opinion on whether or not Lindzen is a paid hack or not. If you are still interested in climate science there is a lot of reading available here: http://www-eaps.mi t.edu/faculty/lind zen/PublicationsRS L.html  (Feb 22, 2014 | post #541)

Q & A with Sam Lowree

Headline:

Government IS the problem.