Send a Message
to Radcliffe Lewis

Comments

32

Joined

Aug 20, 2012

Radcliffe Lewis Profile

Forums Owned

Recent Posts

African-American

Blacks Are Biologically Superior To Whites

You seem to be in high demand because white men spend billions of dollars in marketing to make it look like whites have something to offer, and then when we line up a white side by side with an asian or black,s the black comes off looking the best, then the asian, and the whit looks like a which or goon everytime. Not to mention when you put the penis in a white vagina you feel absolutely nothing - hence the name "cum-box " when referring to white women. Many have been decieved until life experience sets us right to the reality that you are niether beautiful to look at nor do you provide a fullfilling experience mentally, spiritually, or physically. In fact it is the grandest shame these days that of the few remaining heterosexual white men left, they would prefer to sleep with a barrel-shaped hispanic animal calling them "Papi" any night than whith a white woman. A prime example is Arnold Swartzneggar. The white gay men that spend billions to make white women seem to look good by paying artists to make them up, add color, fashion, and edit photographs and motion pictures, do so purely to gain power and assets from others. So in truth white females are ugly and the stink like a dog when they shower, white men smell like feces very often and I believe this is because of the massive amout of anal sex with other men that they tend to do. Black Americans are easily deceived when they are you thanks to propoganda and the legacay of the captivity from which they are reeling. The other races of aisian, indian, and mexican, all smell like dead fish, onion, and alchohol infested pee, respectively. But short of the multimillion dollar developed perfumes that they have to sell and buy everday whites smell like a combination of raw dog, feces, open sores, and pee. It is easy to build school systems under coercion and then steal other people's children under government power to force-feed them propoganda that white = beautiful, but for many, once you go over the big "25" which white woman dread, they wake up to the witches they were looking at. Some will put a paper bag over the head and try to stroke the vaginae on the sides. The jews put a veil over the faces of their own women when having sex with them. Grown men become pedophiles and go in that direction; but for those of us who snap out of the deception, we a liberated from the rhetoric and live normal healthy lives knowing it is by no means appropriate to touch white skin and intercourse with the recessive germ.  (Sep 9, 2012 | post #57)

African-American

Blacks Are Biologically Superior To Whites

I am still wainting to see a community of whites who do not have a legacy of spilling blood and stealing everywhere they go. I wont hold my breath.  (Sep 9, 2012 | post #56)

African-American

Black African's Moors Ruled Europe 700 Years

Mr. Toomis: I will not attempt to speculate then draw specious and indefensible conclusions from your attempt to word smith and mystify your responses in order to detract from the reality that you know exactly what I am saying, but hope that I do not comprehend your replies, so that before others I look like I am off topic. So let me commence this re-response by stating what I hear you replying at this juncture: Where you try to lay aside the contrast between our hair which you call “nappy” and your fur which you call “hair”, in truth, you are unwilling to address this because if this entire discussion is observed through that prism we see clearly that animals have fur and given what you call “negroes” have hair, and that puts you in a completely different box, because animals are not coveted with the divine order to be fruitful, multiply, and have dominion over all the earth and the animals in it, but human beings are and “negroes” are human beings, but if what you have is fur then, or if you are born with a tail, which many Europeans and Indians are, then you know that you are not included in that set and in fact you are an animal in humans' skin wrapping – so no, I will not brush my statement aside. You are going to have to include that perspective or admit that your advances fail once the light of reality of what you are and what I am shines to disclose you the animal and I am the man. Therefore, I am not referring to a “narrow psychological lineage that you claim all “HS” have thereby forcing me to conclude that what you are referring to “narrow...”, and, “HS” speaks of the “Windsors” and “Homo Sapiens”. That “narrow psychological lineage” is what rules you English speaker, and Neanderthal troglodytes that dwelt between the Caspian and Black Sea during the last ice age. And here we see the conflexion in your mis-discourse because at the point where you assert “All species of HS have them...” - whereupon you attempt to mislead readers into thinking more than one species of Homo Sapiens exist today – you then switch into siding with me on questioning the violent proclivities of white people whom you call Caucasoid which they are not necessarily, but it is the mountains between the Black and Caspian Sea that are caucasoid – and then you switch into naming certain parts of the planet emphasizing in particular the Andes and Mexico, and thereby inadvertently disclosing you true allegiance – that you are an escapist Hispanic, or better yet a Mexican, masquerading as a White and attempting to stoke the standing discords between Blacks and Whites and doing it an a discussion board regarding blacks in you vain miscalculation that you think once you get us to shout town the positions of the whites we may then have to conclude with your advances to the glory of Mexicans – which means “mixed race” and we are not talking here of a mixture of homo sapiens races but rather the mixture of the seed of the conquistadors with whatever may have been running around in the jungles in the now Americas which weren't necessarily human but animals indeed. Mr. Toomis, you-um are-um poor-um speaker-um ofum forkum tongueum.  (Sep 9, 2012 | post #1100)

African-American

Black African's Moors Ruled Europe 700 Years

Well thank you Mr. Toomis for bringing up Barros's rear now that I have circumvalated his irrationalities. You now seek to confabulate the normative definitions of the contemporary day by now declaring that “Afro does not mean Negro”. You are correct relative to your Europid semantics of calling mankind “Negro” which I know you mean people of mostly dark skin and relatively tightly curled hair, as opposed to fur. So when you use the term “Negro” you mean “Black”. It is well known Mr. Toomis (and I do admit that I speculate here relative to your gender) that “Afro” is derived from Afri which has a double and complementary meaning: which are 1. the last name of Scipio and kin, whose family the continent was named after by the Romans,after it was conferred upon them as a last name, and 2. “to break apart” wherefore We can easily surmise short of evidence to the contrary that the Africanus family were so named for their penchant at breaking things apart. The question you need to ask Mr. Toomis, is why is it that such a family seemed to cherish the idea of breaking instead of building, and, Why is it that such a property of the behavior of the any such family – breakeruppers instead of builderuppers is so cherished by Europeans. But before you answer the question Mr. Toomis, I am curious to know that given Europeans maintain a natural order of governance and dominion based upon bloodline (whereupon we derive such specimen as Mr. Henry “Windsor” (Saxxe-Coberg Gotha) the German that is third in line to the Royal (by blood) throne of England, how long do you think the European Union will last before it too becomes African?  (Sep 7, 2012 | post #1094)

African-American

Black African's Moors Ruled Europe 700 Years

Oh Barros, Barros, Berbers are Afro-Asiatic, not Euro Asiatic. Check the languages old man, Berber languages are Afro Asiatic. You are not going to be Euro-Asian and speak Afro-Asian. In fact, it they are called "Berber" because it is Europeans who could not understand them. Africans didn't call them Berber in the past. It is really derogatory. In fact the Amazigh, which is the more appropriate term, are more related to the Somalians genetically, not the "Mideast " which is another European nomenclature designed do delimited notice of the prevalence of blacks in the "fertile cresent" (another one). It is nice that you didn't really insult anyone this time, it made your statements more readable, but unfortunately, I am beginning to think that behind the veil of cursings that you tend to splurge forth is a dearth of credible knowledge from which to justify your positions. You are beginning to look a little clueless. Have you allowed your racial biases to cloud the cohesivity of you judgment on these things Barros?  (Sep 6, 2012 | post #1074)

African-American

Black African's Moors Ruled Europe 700 Years

Barros, why are you cursing everybody?  (Sep 4, 2012 | post #1052)

Jamaica, VT

Immigrant Amnesty - Jamaica, VT

Renee, 'dear', you seem to be one of those overtly idealistic white female sub-minds dwelling in a Black American female's body that hugs ever so deeply to the LAPD advanced rhetoric of “Can't we all get along” that left Rodney King dead in the bottom of a swimming pool 20 years later. You start your quotec by attempting to proverbize with your “Deep roots means deep roots” then go straight for the jugular maximum fraud by no documentation scheme of subject-verb-objec t-verb-subject-pre oposition-but no object conjunctive statement of “You do not need documents to make a person belong.” Belong where dear? I guess in your world you don't need documents to engage transactions between persons when the transaction carries substantial value. It is now safe to call you an un-convicted felon, but, let me not capitalize on the 'adhomenimistic descriptions of uncivilized you yet, and disect your fraudmeister rhetorical statement first: “All Americans were immigrants once” - No. A captive is not an immigrant. Real Black Americans did not dream of one day being on the slave ship “Jesus” to be taken to the fields of Georgia and other places to pick cotton for while being whipped, having their hands cut off for reading, and being bred like horses to produce 11 year old lovers for founding fathers. They are now cut off from their homelands, and there is no compensatory relief for them, or, the people they were taken from. Finally, their progeny such as black women who may be just like you, are mis-educated into towing the 'can't we all get along line' even while this America is systematically killing black men, who themselves are so mis-educated that they are aiding and abetting their own demise. But as if that was not bad enough, comes the Mexican Vicente Fox who made the Mexicancipation Proclamation the “Mexicans are here to take jobs here in the United States that not even Black Americans want.” Renee dear, either you have a Mexican phallus so deep up your derriere that it is toggling your numbnified sensibilities, or you are a white girl. Are you Jewish? “Can't we be tolerant of accepting more people?” - I suggest that you go to Mexico and and try to be accepted there firs, especially if you are black. Make sure that when you fill out forms you demand the English version, and mark the slots indicating you are black, if you are black, if you can find the slots. If you survive come back and ask the question here again. Oh by the way, make sure that you carry a firearm with a U.S. Federal firearm permit, because, you know you don't need documents to belong, and hey, Mexico should accept you the way we accept Mexicans, right! Oh by the way, if they don't give you life imprisonment just for having your 'legal' firearm and its permit, don't worry about how you will make a living. I am sure they have a job lined up with Clark Construction, America Movil, or some other Mexican adherent or company, just for you, just like we do here in American for all the illegal and undocumented Mexicans that come here. Afterall, it is immigrants in Mexico that makes it dynamic, their Mexican and Hispanic diversity, right? Finally Renee, dear, it seems you are very Geographically challenged. Mexico is not a state biaaaatch, it is a completely different country. Are you sure you are on planet earth?  (Sep 3, 2012 | post #5)

African-American

Black African's Moors Ruled Europe 700 Years

Alpah, beautifully stated, worth repeating, researching, and developing.  (Sep 3, 2012 | post #984)

African-American

Black African's Moors Ruled Europe 700 Years

So you do admit they were ruled and therefore conquered. Now I have verification why the Ethiopians in the District of Columbia fear the Italians in Adams Morgan sooooooooo much!!!!  (Sep 1, 2012 | post #926)

African-American

Black African's Moors Ruled Europe 700 Years

Try.  (Aug 31, 2012 | post #866)

African-American

Black African's Moors Ruled Europe 700 Years

Where The Truth of today wrote: Negroes are genetically programmed to live for the day, be impulsive, to have sex with anything that moves and not taking care of their children. Here is my response: Whites are genetically programmed to die within four generations by a genetic disease, or turn gay, be irrational, have sex with anything that lays still, is dead or inanimate, and kill their children when the going's tough, and probably eat them.  (Aug 31, 2012 | post #838)

African-American

Black African's Moors Ruled Europe 700 Years

Kid: I am not going to try to catch you in your words, however you need to retract your adhomenim of accusing me of having having supremacist issues. You go by the term “Kush” and you post an image that looks Ethiopian, and if there is one thing I know its that an Ethiopian would much prefer on any given day to me regarded as a European than an African. I am here in DC 'bro', I know. Now perhaps I joined this discussion a little late, and thus my message post to which you responded is #734. This will be my 21st post overall. On the other hand you have posted over 1400 messages to Topix. Now this would not have been relevant except that you insist Moors are not an ethnic group, but that they composed of various ethnicities, nationals...Islam. You then state that Hispanics are not an ethnic group either, then add that the American racial terms are illogical, and that Black Africans did contribute to the conquest of Spain. Outside the standard Ethiopian/Eritrean /Somali quest for the throne of racial superiority within the continent of what is called Africa today, punctuated by the Ethiopian assertion that they were never conquered by Europeans, (never minding the fact that today it is a landlocked country made up of various tribes and ethnicities, and neglecting the reality that Ethiopia was ruled by the House of Savoy of Italy for 46 years), I see no other basis for your denial of Moors and Hispanics being deemed ethnicities that your attempt to disregard both and of those in order to expand your ethnic interests prevail over the American landscape on the hope that the audience here is to uneducated to comprehend the term 'ethnic' or too lazy in their discerning to figure that you are conflicting yourself in your statements. The last time I checked the various published dictionary definition of “ethnic” I see it pertains to a collection of people based upon a commonality of culture, or language, or such. If you have a much different definition then from which you are developing you dialectic playbook for discourse, I invite you to promptly disclose that definition, or point to the message number where you previously scripted and posted it. If you are unable at this juncture to do this, then it stands that you are in error based upon your supremacist issues, not mine, and the rest of us exist in a real and rational world, whilst you are only attempting to circumvalate yourself in your own gypt world of Kush the Kid ism. But I am not willing to subordinate myself to your delusional dialectic scheme. Let me point you to a path of true knowledge: Black Africans did not to contribute to the conquest of Spain; on the contrary, Black Africans played the dominant role in assisting Berber to retain control of lands of The Edge after the fall of Rome which ruled it after the parents of those very Berbers were themselves defeated by Rome during the Punic Wars. For the record all of this had nothing to do with anybody in Eastern Africa. The Blacks you correctly indicate, came up from Western Africa, the outgrowth of the Western African Kingdoms dominated by the Mande. The Edge neither belongs to the Hispanics nor the Ethiopians, Sudanese or anybody else on the Nile, but to the Iberians, the Berbers, and yes, the Moors, and the Mande, who without the latter group, the place would remain uncivilized and dirty. Kush is on the Nile kid, not the Atlantic Ocean. Stop trying to expand your delusions and impose on the rest of us.  (Aug 31, 2012 | post #836)

African-American

Black Americans are the best Athletes!

UKBM, truth hurts. Certain whites are better than others too!  (Aug 30, 2012 | post #3922)

African-American

Black Americans are the best Athletes!

Jessus Sass.. You have over 15000 comments. Go publish a book!!!! Make some money for god's sake and stop giving everthing away. What's wrong with you Black American?  (Aug 30, 2012 | post #3920)

African-American

Black African's Moors Ruled Europe 700 Years

If you stay moors are not an ethnic group because they were black, Berbers, Syrians and Arab, why does this country claim "Hispanics " are an ethnic group? Are they not black, american indian, white, and mixed-race? So what you are really doing is you are trying to lead into a dialectic scheme to be dismissive of the existence of Moors altogether. "black" consists of the people who are dark, tightly curled hair, have dominant genes, natures chosen = the Creator's Chosen. "Berbers " are an ethnic group in and of themselves, the children of the Pheonicians, who originated in present day Lebanon. Syrians are a multiplity or patchwork of minor ethnic groups, which is why they are not unified today. Arab include black people. But it is pointless to educate you, because you mind is made up to try anything do discredit black people by whom you are defined, because even if you are black, your statement points to the mind of the ones of the recessive genes, which if you are black, may yet still be in you. Hence your thinking is white and against the Creators Chosen. How long do you think the cover up and denial schemes that you and those to which you adhere - aggressive whites, will last?  (Aug 30, 2012 | post #734)