Send a Message
to QESdunn

Comments

12

Joined

Jul 13, 2012

QESdunn Profile

Forums Owned

Recent Posts

Physics

Evidence of 'God particle' found

I agree with you in-general about the Religion version of God. Bbuuut, I can see a need for a cognitive control system to tweek physics constants throughout the universe on a continuing bases. The cognitive control system would be impressive, but I would not attribute the human-centered Religious God that se see abused from day to day.  (Jul 18, 2012 | post #194)

Science / Technology

Should evolution be taught in high school?

@Psychology I'm Demanding? [Private Joke with Psychology]  (Jul 15, 2012 | post #96055)

Physics

Evidence of 'God particle' found

I thought the God Particle was short-hand for the God-d_mned Particle? Really! Although, if you could create a Universe, would you be considered a God? Or would you just be a scientist building universes? Not an unfounded question. QESdunn.pbworks.co m I'm sure there are many holy, I mean holes, in the sets of theories. But it's a beginning. But given the ability for scientists to create universes, what position do scientists take in relation to Religious Leaders? Are scientists then to be considered gods? Not going to happen. Are Religions going to finally modify themselves to be consistent with the universes we build?  (Jul 15, 2012 | post #192)

Science / Technology

"Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really Think"

@polymath257 If the Universe is Relativistic, would not the physics constants be relativistic also? Energy in the form of Joules is a dimensional relationship of mass, time, and space (MKS). So as relativity is explored, wouldn't the related constants alter to be consistent with relativity and the surrounding environment? If so, the graient between adjacent environments is modeled how?  (Jul 15, 2012 | post #10869)

Science / Technology

"Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really Think"

Math models are approximations within constraints. GRACE (satellite) shows the gravitational fields of the Earth are not uniform: science.nasa.gov/m issions/grace/ Attributed to variations in density.  (Jul 15, 2012 | post #10868)

Science / Technology

"Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really Think"

The biggest difference between science and religion is that a model is built and the same person that built the model attempts to disprove it. In science the model continuously changes, through no little effort, to become a model that represents more and more of the observable universe. In religion, no effort is taken. Simply regurgitation. No test is offered. Faith is the beginning of every journey; the purpose of faith is to be destroyed by Truth. Faith without the journey is self-deception. Self-deception is the greatest evil, because self-deception preys on the troubled soul. Demons corrupt the souls of their diciples. Diciples of demons promote self-deception. Scientists actively seek to avoid self-deception. They understand the consequences of offering faulty statements. But scientists are also merciful, because we know how difficult it is to make any statement that is universally applicable. Scientists attempt to be specific. Religious peoples intentionally are vague. Very first page of the bible: The Heavens and the Earth were created in 6 days. Tens of thousands of scientists have shown this to be incorrect. Religious people will use short coupled cirular logic to rationalize this wholely incorrect statement and the Bible remains filled with contradictions. There is a great difference between Scientists and Religious Leaders !!! Science seeks to evolve Truth. Religious Leaders seek to sustain faulty insights. Scientists learn, Religious Leaders regurgitate. I consider most religious leaders I have come to know as Con Artists. I only respect one Religious Leader that I know, because he lives what he preaches AND he an his wife are Ethical People.  (Jul 15, 2012 | post #10867)

Science / Technology

Should evolution be taught in high school?

Corruption = Illegal Appropriation Opportunist = Positive quality of humanity (in an ethical environment) If you want to physically do something about eliminating all corruption. eliminate-all-corr [email protected] If you agree with the premises, see if you can get other people to fight corruption with you.  (Jul 15, 2012 | post #96047)

Science / Technology

Should evolution be taught in high school?

Evolution in the sense of causal logic is a system of learning. Nothing new would develop if evolution were not part of learning. A person wouldn't be able to find their way back to a grocery store, and would not find lower prices elsewhere without evolutionary causality. Common Sense = Voice + Logic + Predicting Consequences Teaching Common Sense = Debate (not discussion) + Critical Thinking + Analyzing Systems of Sustainability (any subject) The provides the rudiment ability to predict the future; in likely outcomes. Evolutionary causality allows a person to predict outcomes. A person that does not use evolutionary logic is characterized as retarded or intellectually challenged (I don't know what the current politically correct description is). As for Biological Evolution, is there anything that more closely models observables? Is there anything that produces useful outcomes better than biological evolution. Global Climate Instability would certainly not be an issue. Concern for the future would be non-existent because the assumption would have been there is more than we can destroy. We would still be using DDT, because birth defects from contaminants evolving through the food chain would not have been considered. There are over 10,000 religions in the world; which one is correct? Evolution is much more than a religious threat to man-made passages that contradict the observable universe. Evolution is a mental exercise that helps train the mind to consider things beyond the point of their spear; past their next meal. "The Great Purpose of Higher Education is to train the mind to Efficiently teach oneself; to become an expert at anything Passionately pursued."~Jam es Dunn For the Creationist, consider we more likely were created as a parallel universe than we were as an original creation. Humans can even concieve of building universes and cloning ourselves in those universes. In those universes evolutionary causality is a fundemental system of causality different than recursive causality. So it is more likely that humans like ourselves created us, scientists, than it is that we are an original creation. Evolution should be taught in our school systems, but also with critical thinking and debate. Together they train the minds of students to develop common sense. Voice and confidence is needed to express common sense. Critical Thinking trains the mind to recognize logical relationships. Analyzing systems of sustainabilty trains the mind to sequence logical relationships to predict outcomes. Teaching evolutionary causality is part of teaching common sense.  (Jul 15, 2012 | post #96046)

No Muslim can think of profaning holy Prophet (PBUH): Altaf

I wonder how often prophets contradict one another? If they speak from god, then this would be a test of sanity related to god. If a prophet contradicts themselves or other prophets and they claim to only be human as an excuse for their weaknesses, then they can not be a prophet because that means you can not trust anything they say to be words of god. But assume that the true prophets do have the support of god. Any contradictions would indicate that god is insane, or that the prophet is a false prophet and is defaming god. If it is a death penalty to defame a prophet, what should be the penalty for a false prophet that spreads lies about god? ANY person that presents ANY information as though it is a quote from god is a demon !!! A diciple is a person who chooses not to seek god and they choose to commit their souls to demons and the lies they spread.  (Jul 15, 2012 | post #22335)

Physics

Equivalence Principle

This is potentially a contradiction as written. Light passing horizontally is thought to be a laser and would not reach the upper point on the right wall. And if it reaches the upper point, does it also reach the lower point and is therefore a divergent beam. Or, are you assuming the box is travelling fast enough that the speed of a single photon when passing through the hole has the option of either: 1) shifting reference frames and hitting parallel to the hole, or 2) follow its original reference and hit the upper corner of the box. So the hidden question here is "What determines the Reference Frame of systems of causality in regard to relativity?" Once released, does a photon follow a fixed flight path? Or does the curvature of space-time modify based upon systems of causality? Is this a correct interpretation of what you are seeking?  (Jul 14, 2012 | post #10)

Physics

Equivalence Principle

I provided an extensive reply, what happened to my comment?  (Jul 14, 2012 | post #9)

Physics

Compare and Contrast Higgs Field models with QESdunn TOE

functioned Quantum Entangled Systems (QESdunn) is a theory of everything that models both Higgs Boson and Higgs Field. The QESdunn essay can be found at http://QESdunn.pbw orks.com I invite everyone to compare and contrast QESdunn with other Higgs Field theories; or even provide comments on the understandability of the provided essay. My intent is to modify the essay to better present the concepts to the scientific community. I've worked on QESdunn for over a year, so I have talked about it online looking for anyone to contribute critique. I truely want to explore your incites.  (Jul 13, 2012 | post #1)

Q & A with QESdunn

Headline:

QESdunn - Theory of Everything

When I'm Not on Topix:

Electrical Engineer, Program Manager

Read My Forum Posts Because:

I need your insights

I'm Listening To:

crickets

Read This Book:

Nasty People by Jay Carter

Favorite Things:

Promoting Positive World Changes

On My Mind:

My limited ability to write and present material clearly is making it difficult for me to express relationships as my thought maps evolve.

Blog / Website / Homepage:

http://QESdunn.pbworks.com

I Believe In:

Space and Time are separable and therefore "Nothing" does not exist. As a result everything observable is Relativistic. Within that structure, everything observable is possible.