Also on: http://www.topix.net/us-house, http://www.topix.net/iq/baghdad
Obama's Own Voice May Haunt Him
Hopefully it is not to early to do this. (4 hrs ago | post #1)
Olbermann: Can McCain Be Trusted? McCain's Flip-Flops
Apply, I need the help since summer is here. Less time on the keyboard and fresh air and surf this time of year. Once you become a member of Topix there should be a button on the US Politics page to click that says 'become an editor'. (8 hrs ago | post #214)
Olbermann: Can McCain Be Trusted? McCain's Flip-Flops
I try to balance it. (Saturday | post #194)
Billboards Posted Claiming Martin Luther King Was Republican
The Democrats back in the 50's were for slavery. The Republican were the ones being bashed because they wanted to give them rights. It also traces back to the slave days. Democrats were far mor involved in the slave trade were a majority of Republicans, mainly conservatives were working on ways to give them rights. Learn your history people. More than likely MLK was a Republican. What have the Democrats ever done for the Black people besides find new ways to make you dependent on them? (Saturday | post #11)
Olbermann: Can McCain Be Trusted? McCain's Flip-Flops
Crime is down, where do you get your facts, the Daily Kos? Unemployment was up during Clinton too. The military was almost destroyed during Clinton. We were using weapons that were way outdated and had no money. Many troops had to use fake guns and toys to train with. (Friday Jul 4 | post #152)
Olbermann: Can McCain Be Trusted? McCain's Flip-Flops
Is this for real? Obama doesn't make a stance often and when he does it changes for the crowd he is pleasing, but to say McCain can not be trusted is like saying Obama can be trusted. Stupid (Thursday Jul 3 | post #137)
Kucinich: 'We went to war for the oil companies'
Well you don't write anything so are you illiterate? You use tinyurl.com since you know nobody will read you junk that is coming from some of the most liberal unreliable sites on the internet. They tend to leave out the factors and people that makes the claim. You post garbage! Get a life and learn to think for yourself and don't let a newspaper tell you want to think. Just because USA Today said it does not make it true or fact. (Tuesday Jul 1 | post #46)
Clinton says Obama must 'KISS MY ASS' for his support
How long was Bill a 'great' President? (Monday Jun 30 | post #30)
Kucinich: 'We went to war for the oil companies'
You said Bridge, what the argument is that? I gave you facts and came back with what? A stupid remark that means nothing. You took as an attack, I simply asked a question. You must know a better way and I thought maybe you are trying to make it happen. (Monday Jun 30 | post #39)
Kucinich: 'We went to war for the oil companies'
And what have you done for this Great Country? (Sunday Jun 29 | post #27)
Kucinich: 'We went to war for the oil companies'
What do you do put your own Judge symbols on your own posts? Half this crap you post is opinions, not facts. What else would I expect from a liberal like you. THE WAR IS NOT FOR OIL! Damn you people need it beaten in your head. That is how it got there in the first place isn't it. (Sunday Jun 29 | post #24)
Kucinich: 'We went to war for the oil companies'
Please show me where you got this 85%. i think you have it backwards. (Sunday Jun 29 | post #21)
Kucinich: 'We went to war for the oil companies'
What is wrong with you? First, the Iraqi oil is not about us. It is about the Iraqi State getting their economy together. Second who said it will not help anyone? Iraqi do not pay $4 a gallon. When I was there is 2006 we paid, with the conversion, 75 cents a gallon. It probably will not make it cheaper for them. Next, of course for a price. Who would goto Iraq and deal with that threat and take that gamble for free? Maybe someone as stupid as you. (Sunday Jun 29 | post #16)
Clinton says Obama must 'KISS MY ASS' for his support
Beautifully. Unity in the Democratic Party (Saturday Jun 28 | post #1)
Kucinich: 'We went to war for the oil companies'
at first Liberals and Democrats argued that the "War was Lost", it is not. Then that we can not win it with the Military. Well that is a farce. And then they said there is not any political progress being done by Iraqis. Now that also is not true any longer. Then the argument was that the war was expensive. Why aren't the Iraqis paying for it with the oil they have. Well they are about to with no help from the Democrats in the US. So the Military has all in all won, the Iraqi Politicians have been succeeding and the Iraqi Armed Forces have come a long way in the last 2 years thanks to the Iraqi Government. And the Iraqi's are in the hunt for someone to get their oil on the market for them. So what is your argument now? (Saturday Jun 28 | post #12)
