Aug 13, 2007
Proud American Democrat's Favorites
Proud American Democrat Profile
PLEASE, tell me then, Pete/Bob. You claimed more military died under Clinton than W. That's where the WHOLE argument started. Go back to the first page of this discussion. PLEASE tell me where you got that information. You have NOT given an answer to that. All you've done is try to poke holes in the D.O.D. report I referenced. TELL US WHERE YOU GOT YOUR NUMBERS. (Jan 16, 2010 | post #217)
So, that means they wouldn't cover a similar catastrophe if white people were involved? It's just a stupid suggestion. (Jan 15, 2010 | post #22)
Neither. Dave. But I guess if I REALLY had to pick, it'd be Conan. (Jan 15, 2010 | post #2)
what they have lack." ...like the ability to conjugate a VERB? (Jan 15, 2010 | post #64)
Right. Because there are no caucasians working at news stations. Oh, and Obama didn't have a white mother or grandparents. What a tool... Also, why don't you go back to posting as Pete or Bob? Funny how you disapproved of me changing my name, when you continue to do so. I did it to reflect whatever I was responding to. I'm guessing you're doing it to annoy people. I'm guessing when you're not on here spreading lies and hate, you hold your finger an inch away from your little sister and say, "I'm not touching you. I'm not touching you." Grow up, Pete/Bob. Grow a pair and pick a username. (Jan 15, 2010 | post #16)
Pathetic. Go back to your social studies class, seventh grader. (Jan 15, 2010 | post #18)
Out-thought? Out-voiced? Hardly. All I've been asking for is for Pete/Bob to back up his claim. He continues to dance around the subject without addressing it. He's not man enough to admit his claim was false. So, he resorts to pathetic insults. Change the word "libs" to "conservative s" and your statement describes Pete/Bob perfectly. (Jan 15, 2010 | post #213)
Right. And the numbers are likely to change SO MUCH that somehow 7500 is actually more than 12,000, right? Somewhere 5,000 military personnel died under Clinton and they forgot to add them to the report I suppose Give me a break. These are Department of Defense numbers. If you have something more accurate, you have yet to provide it. Why? Because you can't. PLEASE tell us how many military died under Clinton vs. Bush. And PLEASE tell us where you get your numbers. (Jan 15, 2010 | post #212)
http://siadapp.dmd c.osd.mil/personne l/CASUALTY/castop. htm Where's yours? (Jan 14, 2010 | post #206)
Bob/Pete, your refusal to acknowledge the facts as laid before you and anyone here who has followed your little tap dance, and your inability to produce one piece of evidence to back up your claim have left you with absolutely no credibility. You couldn't prove your claims were true. I was able to prove your claims were false. Suck on it, Pete/Bob. You're a pathetic loser. (Jan 14, 2010 | post #205)
Ummm. What exactly does that mean? (Jan 14, 2010 | post #197)
What exactly is "Obama's one?" The link on the White House web page IS to donate to the Red Cross. You idiots just keep talking out of your a$$es. (Jan 14, 2010 | post #5)
I don't care if someone doesn't support the President. It's their choice. Not everyone is gonna agree with what he does. But, if the same people who called those who protested against W's policies "unpatriotic " are now Tea-Bagging or otherwise protesting against THIS President, then they have no right to call themselves patriotic. You can't call one group "unpatriotic " because they are protesting against a President, and call another group "patriotic " for doing the same thing. (Jan 14, 2010 | post #11)
When someone on here makes a claim like thisAre we suppose to take that as fact? Because I knew it was not. There's a viral email that's been going around for years making that claim. People read them, believe them, forward them, or post them here. So, when someone pointed out it was wrong, "Pete" declared the reference came from a "lib" site. Pete didn't give any evidence to back up HIS claim, just shrugged off the person who disagreed. So I posted a link to the D.O.D. report which CLEARLY disproved Pete's claim. His responseHe has continually refused to acknowledge the numbers from the D.O.D. report, and has yet to give us a link, a reference, or ANY SHRED of evidence to back up his claim. Has the discussion gone off track? I suppose. But you have only Pete/Bob to blame for refusing to admit his claim was wrong and his numbers inaccurate. Pete? Bob? Are you man enough to put an end to this? I see you have yet to create a username, so I doubt it. (Jan 14, 2010 | post #195)
Q & A with Proud American Democrat
New Lenox, IL
L.A. Cafe, Tom Kelly's
I Belong To:
New Life Church
When I'm Not on Topix:
I know you're ALL missing me!
Read My Forum Posts Because:
Why not?! I read YOUR posts...
I'm Listening To:
WBEZ (National Public Radio)
Read This Book:
Lies (and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them) by Al Franken
My wife and kids. White Sox. Softball. Music.
On My Mind:
Did I leave the coffee maker on?
I Believe In:
...Crystal Light, 'cuz I believe in me.
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC