May 29, 2012
Yes, that is what started it all. But that statement in itself is misleading. The groups were not primarily anti-gay. You are assuming what Huckabee meant. This your inability to post what I requested. There are lots of Christian Principles. Closing on Sunday is one of them. Generosity is another. Chick-fil-A offers numerous scholarships. They are welcoming to everyone entering the business. They gave free food away to customers during the numerous storms that have ravaged the country recently. Why, if Huckabee meant anti gay values, didn't he just say that? Your assumption is showing. That's an interesting take as well. Again, they wee not primarily anti-gay groups. And, for people no longer wanting to give their money to Chick-fil-A, Chick-fil-A's income certainly jumped to record numbers. (Tuesday Apr 28 | post #23393)
You do realize the Bill Of Rights outlines what Government cannot infringe, right? (Tuesday Apr 28 | post #23391)
I notice he never replied. Lol (Tuesday Apr 28 | post #23390)
Agreed. (Tuesday Apr 28 | post #23389)
Exactly. If I bothered to go back and find the posts, he/she/it would just twist it into something else, or claim we all misunderstood the post, or... If he/she/it had acknowledged even one valid point I've made, I might bother. (Tuesday Apr 28 | post #23388)
Lmao! Nowhere in that quote does he say the Muslim Baker gets a free pass. More dishonesty from The Box. (Tuesday Apr 28 | post #23387)
I see you totally avoided my questions. Yet you request this of me. Double standard. (Tuesday Apr 28 | post #23386)
No they didn't! Point out the portion of Huckabee's statement that said anything about gays! Yes, the people rallied behind Chick-fil-A because they were targeted unjustly. Yes, when I feel that a company is targeted unjustly, I go out of my way to support them. I am not alone. (Tuesday Apr 28 | post #23290)
The last part here, was the part you "snipped ". You have now answered it, and this made my point. The Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and as such outweighs your treasured public accomodation laws! My point has been, that in this instance, the public accomodation law was unconstitutional. It may not be, in every case, but this one, regardless of what the court said, was unconstitutional. Constitutional rights DO trump public accomodation rights. (Tuesday Apr 28 | post #23289)
Again, where exactly in the constitution is that? I addressed your statement. Now that you were proven wrong, you move the goal post by adding ALWAYS, which addresses your coming request for ANOTHER example of your dishonesty. Everyone reading these posts knows the difference. More than likely, including you. Your bias and willful ignorance disallows your admission. (Tuesday Apr 28 | post #23245)
Nobody is arguing you've made those two points. But, that doesn't mean you never made the statement about the product. I didn't get caught with my pants down. I speak the truth. You are the one consistently deceptive. I ran nowhere. I'm still here. I'm still replying to you. I'm still pointing out your dishonesty. Everyone sees it whether they share your bias or not. (Tuesday Apr 28 | post #23228)
BS. You simply posted and talked in circles in hopes of staying a step ahead. It didn't work, so the next logical step is smoke and mirrors or continued deception. (Tuesday Apr 28 | post #23226)
How so? Neither can be exercised. You keep saying you get the concept but continue to post statements proving otherwise. That's at least two concepts you claim to accept but really do not. (Tuesday Apr 28 | post #23225)
So each post in this thread is in direct response to the subject matter in the article, rather than the post being replied to? That's is interesting! More dishonesty from The Box. Yet another shocker! (Tuesday Apr 28 | post #23221)
More dishonesty and simplistic thinking from you. Another shocker. How is it your place to say the Jack can't see the concept or theme intended for his product and service as part of the product and service. Stop being narrow minded because of your bias. (Tuesday Apr 28 | post #23220)
Q & A with Prep-for-Dep
Lake Charles, LA
I Belong To:
C.P.R. (Constituents for Political Reform)
When I'm Not on Topix:
I'm working. More people should try it.
Read My Forum Posts Because:
I know how to solve America's issues.
I'm Listening To:
Read This Book:
Camping, Shooting, Fishing, Hunting, Prepping
On My Mind:
Preparing for hard times and celebrating good ones.
I Believe In:
The US Constitution and it's legally ratified amendments.
Copyright © 2015 Topix LLC