Send a Message
to MrUltimateSinister

Comments

53

Joined

Sep 7, 2013

MrUltimateSinister Profile

Recent Posts

African-American

Random thoughts...

that or shes that brazilian tranny.  (Jun 5, 2014 | post #76940)

African-American

Random thoughts...

u lying white troll! here you said you were half native and half black from the state of Alabama. nothing about no triracial sh*thttp://www.top ix.com/forum/afam/ TULU1GPOK6LIRICIC/ p3394#c74030 dats that the only time where you said. like I said you are a white troll!  (Jun 5, 2014 | post #76938)

African-American

Random thoughts...

wait I thought you said your half AA/??? your not NA but a white cave women. your a liar.  (Jun 5, 2014 | post #76925)

African-American

europeans are a recent and hybrid race!!!! =)

silly pale cave monkey! what does haplogroups have to do with anything or what I am saying? haplogroups dont tell admixture. but if you want to go that route half of european haplogroup do not originate in europe. give up! Europeans area recent hybrid race! eheheheheheh!  (Apr 26, 2014 | post #53)

African-American

Hebrew Israelite

mwahahahahahahahah!!!! good job!  (Nov 10, 2013 | post #80875)

African-American

europeans are a recent and hybrid race!!!! =)

lol! some imagination. so tell.  (Nov 10, 2013 | post #47)

African-American

europeans are a recent and hybrid race!!!! =)

nopehttp://www.ncb i.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ articles/PMC132500 7/ quote ---------- Many human craniofacial dimensions are largely of neutral adaptive significance, and an analysis of their variation can serve as an indication of the extent to which any given population is genetically related to or differs from any other. When 24 craniofacial measurements of a series of human populations are used to generate neighbor-joining dendrograms, it is no surprise that all modern European groups, ranging all of the way from Scandinavia to eastern Europe and throughout the Mediterranean to the Middle East, show that they are closely related to each other. The surprise is that the Neolithic peoples of Europe and their Bronze Age successors are NOT CLOSELY RELATED to the MODERN inhabitants, although the prehistoric/modern ties are somewhat more apparent in southern Europe. It is a further surprise that the Epipalaeolithic Natufian of Israel from whom the Neolithic realm was assumed to arise has a CLEAR LINK to Sub-Saharan Africa. Basques and Canary Islanders are clearly associated with modern Europeans. When canonical variates are plotted, NEITHER sample ties in with Cro-Magnon as was once suggested. The data treated here support the idea that the Neolithic moved out of the Near East into the circum-Mediterrane an areas and Europe by a process of demic diffusion but that subsequently the in situ residents of those areas, derived from the Late Pleistocene inhabitants, absorbed both the agricultural life way and the people who had brought it. -------- cranoically they were different. recent studies like I posted shows modern europeans entered europe recently. http://news.nation algeographic.com/n ews/2013/13/130423 -european-genetic- history-dna-archae ology-science/ quote ---------- DNA recovered from ancient skeletons reveals that the genetic makeup of modern Europe was established around 4,500 B.C. in the mid-Neolithic—or 6,500 years ago—and not by the first farmers who arrived in the area around 7,500 years ago or by earlier hunter-gatherer groups.(Read about Europe's oldest known town.) "The genetics show that something around that point caused the genetic signatures of previous populations to disappear," said Alan Cooper, director of the Australian Centre for Ancient DNA at the University of Adelaide, where the research was performed. ----------- this is so fun and easy I have not changed my argument.  (Nov 10, 2013 | post #46)

African-American

europeans are a recent and hybrid race!!!! =)

yeah entertainment in getting your racist butt kicked.  (Nov 10, 2013 | post #45)

African-American

the moors were black africans not arabs!!!

http://www.vam.ac. uk/content/article s/a/africans-in-me dieval-and-renaiss ance-art-duke-ales sandro-de-medici/ quote -------------- "Alessandro's mother, Simonetta, was allegedly a MOORISH slave who had worked in the household of Lorenzo and his parents during their exile in Rome. Although Alessandro's paternity was disputed, contemporaries acknowledged his maternal ancestry, even nicknaming him 'Il Moro', the Moor. This term was (and is still) used in Italy to describe AFRICANS and also Europeans with dark complexions or hair. But contemporary references to Alessandro's DARK skin, CURLY hair, WIDE nose and THICK lips, as well as visual evidence from surviving portraits, suggest that he was indeed of mixed heritage." --------------- theres your proof right there.  (Nov 10, 2013 | post #18447)

African-American

More evidence for heidelbergensis admixture

actually haplogroup A(y-dna) is said to be around 237,000YBP - 581,000. you lose again jew boy alalalalalalalalal a! you lose !! alalalalalalalalal alalala! still no proof of heildergenis.  (Nov 10, 2013 | post #119)

African-American

europeans are a recent and hybrid race!!!! =)

neandethals are not modern humans dumb neanderthal. you make my argument easy!  (Nov 10, 2013 | post #34)

African-American

europeans are a recent and hybrid race!!!! =)

modern euros not direct descendants of first cro magnon stupid albino! they are a recent peoplehttp://news. nationalgeographic .com/news/2013/13/ 130423-european-ge netic-history-dna- archaeology-scienc e/ quote ---------- DNA recovered from ancient skeletons reveals that the genetic makeup of modern Europe was established around 4,500 B.C. in the mid-Neolithic—or 6,500 years ago—and not by the first farmers who arrived in the area around 7,500 years ago or by earlier hunter-gatherer groups.(Read about Europe's oldest known town.) ---------- http://www.ncbi.nl m.nih.gov/pmc/arti cles/PMC1325007/ quote ---------- Many human craniofacial dimensions are largely of neutral adaptive significance, and an analysis of their variation can serve as an indication of the extent to which any given population is genetically related to or differs from any other. When 24 craniofacial measurements of a series of human populations are used to generate neighbor-joining dendrograms, it is no surprise that all modern European groups, ranging all of the way from Scandinavia to eastern Europe and throughout the Mediterranean to the Middle East, show that they are closely related to each other. The surprise is that the Neolithic peoples of Europe and their Bronze Age successors are NOT CLOSELY RELATED to the MODERN inhabitants, although the prehistoric/modern ties are somewhat more apparent in southern Europe. It is a further surprise that the Epipalaeolithic Natufian of Israel from whom the Neolithic realm was assumed to arise has a CLEAR LINK to Sub-Saharan Africa. Basques and Canary Islanders are clearly associated with modern Europeans. When canonical variates are plotted, NEITHER sample ties in with Cro-Magnon as was once suggested. The data treated here support the idea that the Neolithic moved out of the Near East into the circum-Mediterrane an areas and Europe by a process of demic diffusion but that subsequently the in situ residents of those areas, derived from the Late Pleistocene inhabitants, absorbed both the agricultural life way and the people who had brought it. -------- i know it hurts pinkie, but you have to go look for your origins. maybe central asia? ahahahahahahahahah ahahahah!  (Nov 10, 2013 | post #33)

African-American

europeans are a recent and hybrid race!!!! =)

ehehehehehe...pure fantasies from this fake wannabe african albino! more shall be slayedeeeheheheheh ehe...that fantasy reconstruction is not going to save you. Quote: The extremely large skeletal samples that come from sites such as Taforalt (Fig. 8.13) and Afalou constitute an invaluable resource for understanding the makers of Iberomaurusian artefacts, and their number is unparalleled elsewhere in Africa for the early Holocene. Frequently termed Mechta-Afalou or Mechtoid, these were a skeletally robust people and definitely African in origin, though attempts, such as those of Ferembach (1985), to establish similarities with much older and rarer Aterian skeletal remains are tenuous given the immense temporal separation between the two (Close and Wendorf 1990). At the opposite end of the chronological spectrum, dental morphology does suggest connections with later Africans, including those responsible for the Capsian Industry (Irish 2000) and early mid-Holocene human remains from the western half of the Sahara (Dutour 1989), something that points to the Maghreb as one of the regions from which people recolonised the desert (MacDonald 1998). --Lawrence Barham The First Africans: African Archaeology from the Earliest Toolmakers to Most Recent Foragers (Cambridge World Archaeology) how can the mechyta have pale skin when you pale skin mutants only evolved 5,000 years ago!!! http://www.dailyma il.co.uk/sciencete ch/article-1210056 /White-Europeans-e volved-5-500-years -ago-food-habits-c hanged.html eeehehehehehehe!!! !  (Nov 10, 2013 | post #32)

African-American

europeans are a recent and hybrid race!!!! =)

http://www.ncbi.nl m.nih.gov/pmc/arti cles/PMC1325007/ quote ---------- Many human craniofacial dimensions are largely of neutral adaptive significance, and an analysis of their variation can serve as an indication of the extent to which any given population is genetically related to or differs from any other. When 24 craniofacial measurements of a series of human populations are used to generate neighbor-joining dendrograms, it is no surprise that all modern European groups, ranging all of the way from Scandinavia to eastern Europe and throughout the Mediterranean to the Middle East, show that they are closely related to each other. The surprise is that the Neolithic peoples of Europe and their Bronze Age successors are NOT CLOSELY RELATED to the MODERN inhabitants, although the prehistoric/modern ties are somewhat more apparent in southern Europe. It is a further surprise that the Epipalaeolithic Natufian of Israel from whom the Neolithic realm was assumed to arise has a CLEAR LINK to Sub-Saharan Africa. Basques and Canary Islanders are clearly associated with modern Europeans. When canonical variates are plotted, NEITHER sample ties in with Cro-Magnon as was once suggested. The data treated here support the idea that the Neolithic moved out of the Near East into the circum-Mediterrane an areas and Europe by a process of demic diffusion but that subsequently the in situ residents of those areas, derived from the Late Pleistocene inhabitants, absorbed both the agricultural life way and the people who had brought it. -------- this is your forefather! eehehehehehehehe!! !!!!!!!!!! http://img4.images hack.us/img4/4709/ caucromagnon4debun k.jpg science already proves you euros not related to cro-magnon. ahahahahahahahahah ahah!!!!!  (Nov 10, 2013 | post #31)

African-American

More evidence for heidelbergensis admixture

eheeheheheh...stil l no proof of heidelbergenis. alalalalalalalalal ahttp://io9.com/58 68525/modern-human s-may-have-evolved -200000-years-earl ier-than-we-though t ------- "up with the recent discovery in Israel's Qesem cave of a shockingly modern human tooth that dates back to 400,000 years ago." ------- you are one moronic jew. eeheheheheheheheh! and heidelbergenis is the acestor to all humans!  (Nov 10, 2013 | post #100)