Apr 30, 2008
Here ya go, asswipe... http://www.lpi.usr a.edu/publications /books/barringer_c rater_guidebook/ Be sure to read Chapter 13, Post-Impact Lake. You may have to scroll down the page to find it. Let me know if you need any help with thatBWHAHAHAHAHAHA ! No one give a shit about your opinions of others and I certainly don't give a shit about your opinion of me. For your opinion to matter, I would have to have at least a tiny bit of respect for you. I don't. (7 hrs ago | post #129374)
Smug little turd, aren't you? (7 hrs ago | post #129371)
He never said a friggin word about atheism in that post, jackass. I that the only argument you can make? Bitching about atheism? Pretty weakYes, idiots often laugh at what they can't understand. (9 hrs ago | post #173363)
Seriously? Here. Not to far from you: http://www.cincinn atiusa.com/Attract ions/detail.asp?At tractionID=20 (9 hrs ago | post #111708)
This precisely why you are an object of ridicule. You claim to only care about the truth but nothing could be further from the truth. You claim to care about data but it is plain you have no use for data. You claim to care about evidence but ignore it just as you do facts. For the 500th time. It is YOUR responsibility to prove there was a global flood and ONLY your responsibility. Your ridiculous statement that "There's nothing in it which confirms a one year flood did not occur there in the past 11,000 years." is a steaming pile of horseshit. YOU have to confirm it DID happen. Saying there's nothing to confirm it didn't happen doesn't mean a damn thing. You have to confirm it DID happen. Something you have failed miserably to do. Get it yet??? Understand??? BTW, don't pretend to be logical. You're not. But go ahead and continue your comedy act. (13 hrs ago | post #129352)
The Barringer lake dried up over 11,000 years ago, you dope. More than 6500 years before your phony flood. (13 hrs ago | post #129351)
I wouldn't help me. I always realize my mistakes approximately 3.5 milliseconds after I hit Post Comment. (Friday | post #13791)
As are youThank you. The same to youI've yet to do that but you remember to blindly follow a fundamental belief that takes more faith than knowledge or reason. (Friday | post #111683)
Correct. I declined to do your homework for you. Get off you lazy ass and do it yourself. I repeat (Friday | post #129275)
No. That is EXACTLY what you saidQUOTE who="SevenTee "]We can not possibly identify a bone that is millions of years old and make any sort of rational conclusions about what that bone is. It is pure speculation.[/QUOT E] Because YOU cannot make any rational conclusions does not mean the thousands of scientists who - unlike yourself - are trained and experienced in the science can't come to conclusions. And they have. (Friday | post #111675)
Baloney. Please provide a scientific reference - not someone's personal opinion - where it is claimed that the Theory of Evolution holds there is no need for a creator. You guys are fond of saying man cannot know the mind of god then turn right around and insist that you know exactly what he did, how he did it, how long it took and why he did it. Make up your friggin minds! Your last comment is hilarious. Yes, science updates its theories has new information is discovered. Why you see that as a negative is beyond me. You folks on the other hand refuse to update your knowledge no matter what. If Jesus Christ came down and said "No, Genesis is sort of right but that not really the way it went", you would stand there are argue with him. (Friday | post #173318)
First you say there is no fossil record then you say there is. Do you have any idea at all what in the f**k you're talking about??? (Friday | post #111668)
Q & A with MikeF
Pissing people off since 1949
West Central Florida
When I'm Not on Topix:
I'm doing something useful. Or sleeping.
Read My Forum Posts Because:
You've got nothing better to do.
I'm Listening To:
The voices in my head.
On My Mind:
I Believe In: