Send a Message
to marksman11

Comments

5,271

Joined

Jan 20, 2010

marksman11 Profile

Forums Owned

Recent Posts

Asheville, NC

It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...

I wouldn't care as much about your believing in human from non-human evolution, heck people have believed many silly and incorrect things over our history. My problem is that you have no credibility as being an honest person. And honest person would have no problem saying, "Yes, I know that I am accepting human from non-human evolution in faith, but that is ok, I think it is true"....you' d be wrong, but at least you would be honest. As it is, you are wrong, and then lying about being wrong, and this leaves you appearing as very ignorant, gullible, infantile, shallow, immature, delusional, mentally weak, repulsive, and irritating and unattractive to be around. In short, the little irritating dude that everyone walks away from when he arrives because they want to be nice, but they have limits to their tolerance.  (Tuesday | post #165311)

Asheville, NC

It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...

More heads! We already know that life forms in the past had heads. There is no pattern. I could make up a fantasy of 10 differing skulls that have lived within the last 200 years and date them anyway I want, and claim there is a fictitious pattern, but it would be a lie, and meaningless. Plus you guys aren't consistent. You claim a pattern between ape and humans, yet humans did not evolve from apes, but rather a common ancestor. Make up your minds. One minute we are sapiens, and the next we are apes. Nothing consistent about your argument at all, and that is what is to be expected from people desperately trying to support a fantasy that has never been observed, but try to make it appear as if it has. Why do you think that most other science is not challenged as human from non-human evolution is? It is because the evidence in most other scientific claims are self evident, make sense, logical, and observable. That can't be said for human from non-human evolution. Pattern claims and all the other propaganda that is presented as evidence is obvious bullshit presented to convince those who don't question things, never challenge them, and think there couldn't possibly be an alternative answer, or that the presenter has political or scientific biases. Sit down in your recliner tonight and really think about what you are proposing, and if you don't have doubts that are becoming more serious over time, you have major problems with reality.  (Tuesday | post #165310)

Asheville, NC

It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...

How can it show a pattern when you have apes and humans coexisting at the same time? DUHThere is no pattern, and as long as human from non-human evolution remains unobserved it can explain any stupid thing you want it tooI already have with the fossils of metamorphosis!! I really don't see how any thinking person can accept human from non-human evolution as valid. It wouldn't even make an interesting comic book. It's like a bunch of like minded idiots praising the emperors new clothes. The ignorance of the whole thing amazes me.  (Thursday May 18 | post #165303)

Asheville, NC

It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...

It's no less an opinion than you claiming the fossil record shows a pattern!!!! I say there is no pattern and you say there is. BOTH ARE OPINIONS.....hemmm m.........requirin g faith to believe no lessThere is no pattern, and special creation is a much better explanation and no less faith based than your opinionPE has never been observed in a lab nor nature and is just more story telling. There is nothing scientific about it.  (Thursday May 18 | post #165302)

Asheville, NC

It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...

Sticks and stones....that is all you have...sticks and stonesEvidently you don't understand that sometimes the strata is recognized and identified by the fossils found it it, and then other times the fossils are dated and identified by the strata they are found in. Which ever supports your story telling is the one you will use. Fossils do not support human from non-human evolution. What your dumbass needs to concentrate on is how the origin of life could have possibly occurred without GOD. Heck with evolution, we already know that is bullshit, and it couldn't ever occur until life starts. CAN"T EVOLVE UNTIL IT EXISTS!!!! So your dumb atheist ass needs to replicate the origin of life without a designer. GOOD LUCK.....AIN" T GOING TO HAPPEN!!!!  (Saturday May 13 | post #165245)

Asheville, NC

It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...

“But metamorphosis is different. The process of transforming a caterpillar into a butterfly is surely far more complex than anything ever accomplished by man. The information needed to control this process, stored somewhere in the caterpillar’s cells, must be far greater than that stored in any man-made computer program.” https://uncommonde scent.com/intellig ent-design/metamor phosis/  (Friday May 12 | post #165195)

Asheville, NC

It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...

There is no pattern to the fossil record. There are just fossils, to think one transitions into something else is just fantasy, and wishful thinking. All a fossil can show is that something once lived, died, and left an image of itself. THe rest is storytellingIF that is true, why fabricate an excuse that has never been observed? Why do that if it wasn't necessary? You guys get hung up in our own bullshit.  (Friday May 12 | post #165190)

Asheville, NC

It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...

I see no need to address this as I have already addressed it so many times already. It's just circular......same links, same everything. If you want to believe this, go head on. I find it very unconvincing and the beliefs of a person that is very confused, but confusion is not against the law and you can accept this marlarky if you want. I really don't care what kind of silliness you guys want to believe, I just wish you had the integrity to be honest about it, but you guys just don't have that in you. It is obvious to the world and thinking people that the only way human from non-human evolution, since it has never been observed and can't be observed, can be honestly accepted is in faith. But you aren't honest enough to admit that because if you did, you'd have to admit that human from non-human evolution would then be on a level playing field and that can never be accepted even though that is the truth of the situation. Creationism is a much better explanation for what we observe around us.  (Thursday May 11 | post #165177)

Asheville, NC

It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...

This is just a jumbled up mess of confusion, with the inner mammal ear, which doesn't show a transition but the ear working of a long extinct mammal in China. It shows it's method of hearing, but there is nothing there showing it transitioning into anything. I see no relevancy of algae to this debate and your 3rd link added nothing to the debate either. just definitions. What you need to do is look at this information, and it's complexity, and ask yourself if nature can produce this kind of created complexity on it's own, and of course the answer is no. evolution is assumed, not observed......  (Thursday May 11 | post #165176)

Asheville, NC

It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...

All you'd do is morph your hypothesis to comply, like you did the Cambrian Explosion with punctuated equilibria. Also there is no pattern to the fossil record. All fossils can show is that something lived, died, and left an image of itself. It can't show heritage.  (Thursday May 11 | post #165175)

Asheville, NC

It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...

See how ignorant you are? You say there are two views.....your stupid views, ...then one that has no valid evidence at all? Well, if it has no valid evidence at all, why do you consider it a valid view? If you are right, why isn't there just one valid view.....YOURS!!.. ...yet you subconsciously admitted that creation is a valid view because you included it as one of only two views. You are self contradictory. You are not very smart.. I don't need to refute you, you do it for meYou've had a hundred chances to present it, and you still haven't done it. By the way, you messed up your quotes in this post, but I'll address your mistake. You attempted to make the point that science is never settled, and is always open to change. I know that, but you'll never use it as such because you have to deal in facts and proofs because you can't be honest enough to admit you believe things in faith. All you are saying is that human from non-human evolution can ever be proven by science......thus if you can never prove it true, you have to accept its validity in faith. Either you can prove human from non-human evolution occurred or you can't.....AND YOU CAN'T!!!  (Wednesday May 10 | post #165168)

Asheville, NC

It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...

Bullshit.....then why can't you post one piece of empirical evidence that puts the whole debate to rest? Yet you can't. After 160 years the debate continuesMy views are faith based and I am honest about that. Yours are also faith based, and you won't be honest about it. That is your problem. I don't care about the stupidity of your beliefs, that is obvious. I just put your dishonesty concerning them on display.....  (Wednesday May 10 | post #165166)

Asheville, NC

It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...

REally? Hobbits and the like proves humans evolved from non-humans? Sure, they are tested, but they can't conclude that humans evolved from non-humans.....how silly to even post this in support of human from non-human evolution. Fact....hominin fossils are tested, Fact,.... hominin fossil tests do not show human from non-human evolution.  (Wednesday May 10 | post #165164)

Asheville, NC

It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...

You and your boys need to get your facts straight because they say it is a hypothesis and that is why it doesn't have to be observed. You guys can't even agree among yourselvesLimitati ons of the Scientific Method     The scientific method is limited to those phenomena which can be observed or measured.  For example, what existed prior to the Big Bang and the known universe is outside of the realm of science to investigate.     Science is good at explaining "how things work" but not necessarily for explaining "why do such things exist" or "for what purpose."   http://www.oakton. edu/user/4/billton g/eas100/scientifi cmethod.htm If it is unobservable, it is at best a hypothesis, not a theory. There is no Theory of Evolution, the best you can have is an hypothesis of evolution, and that isn't even a good hypothesisThere are no observable patterns. When you have human from non-human evolution which has never been observed which is demanded by the scientific method, then you can fabricate anything you want to and call it evidence, thus punctuated equilibria which has also never been observed, for panspermia, which again, has never been observed. It's just story telling clothed in scientific bullshitCommon Mistakes in Applying the Scientific Method As stated earlier, the scientific method attempts to minimize the influence of the scientist's bias on the outcome of an experiment. That is, when testing an hypothesis or a theory, the scientist may have a preference for one outcome or another, and it is important that this preference not bias the results or their interpretation. http://teacher.nsr l.rochester.edu/ph y_labs/AppendixE/A ppendixE.html This is you.....and the rest of your ilkGive me the empirical evidence then. Give me the observation of human from non-human evolution that is empirical that makes human from non-human evolution not a hypothesis, but what you guys falsely call "The theory of evolution"... ..Please provide this empirical evidence that leaves human from non-human evolution as a FACT!!!! I bet you can't.....pictures of skulls ain't cutting it. Not even close.....  (Wednesday May 10 | post #165163)