Send a Message
to Kenedy njoroge

Comments

538

Joined

May 19, 2014

Kenedy njoroge Profile

Forums Owned

Recent Posts

Evolution Debate

It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...

And the grand theory mutates once again .... www.sciencealert.c om/the-world-s-top -biologists-have-m et-to-discuss-whet her-we-should-upda te-evolution  (Nov 28, 2016 | post #157889)

Evolution Debate

It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...

Heaven fills with joy when one like you repents.Though i personally find your character despicable and wouldnt even want a debate with you, know that your maker loves you. He has good plans for you and will redeem you no matter what it costs. Please let Him.  (Nov 21, 2016 | post #157632)

Evolution Debate

It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...

God ,according to my bible, existed even before time began meaning He exists and operates outside our realm of cause and effect. He is not subject to laws of science as they apply to us thus needs not have been created or designed. Very simple indeedMy argument is that the nature and function of gametes drastically lower the leeway evolution had in designing the process that produces them. The evolution of gametogenesis (and gametes) could not have been an open ended process like for other cells, a fact that drastically reduces posible pathways available to almost one. This in turn means a purpose driven process, which does not make sense under naturalism. You should be able to see this, as you come across as smart chap.  (Nov 20, 2016 | post #157586)

Evolution Debate

It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...

Does that equate to an origin for lifeI never said they all have to be there did i ? This was my querry, put another way ; Since we observe 9 steps today, and can be sure they were not so at the very begining, how did they develop ? Was there a time when there were 2 steps ? or did they all appear at once ? Now look at it this way, Which ones are the last three additions ? What manner of gametes was produced prior to the their addition ? viable or not ? Do you now see how unlikely it is to generate a high stake process like gametogenesis in small incremental steps ?  (Nov 20, 2016 | post #157578)

Evolution Debate

It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...

And that is exactly what s going to happen.  (Nov 20, 2016 | post #157577)

Evolution Debate

It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...

No. The important point is that it is not possible. For gametes, evolution did not stand a chance of transitioning the organism from asexual to sexual reproduction in tiny incremental steps.  (Nov 19, 2016 | post #157565)

Evolution Debate

It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...

As i read this post i noticed not a few sticking words that made the argument hilarious , if not outright stupid. check them out; Possible explanation VE hypothesis Possibility Could The theory proposes Would (5 times) May Man ! You have stepped on crap, whats sad is that you still havent smelled it.  (Nov 19, 2016 | post #157563)

Evolution Debate

It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...

Sperm and egg cells are haploid , that is, different from somatic cells which are diploid , and are rendered thus by a complex 9 stage cell division process called meiosis. The question here is ; do you think there were an earlier and simpler ,say 2 stage, process that resulted in viable gametes , that the evolutionary process improved on to give us the current meiosis ?  (Nov 18, 2016 | post #157561)

Evolution Debate

It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...

Yes, mankind is by default doomed to hell. Everybody, exactly like you say. But it is by being presented with a lifeline that man understands that God did not desire to create robots and sycophants but individuals with real choices to be made within a 100% free will set up. This is the reason me and you are on opposing sides. we are not bags of chemicals held hostage by chemical gradients in our brains but souls with the ability to control our thoughts and actions 100%. Once you have a glimpse of Gods love for man and understand the choices available, thats when HIS ways start becoming discernible in your mind. What you are positting here, otherwise called predestination is pure misconception of the reality that is God. Learn, learn. HE says , " come let us reason togetherYou are headed for big trouble my friend. Real big shit. Why dont you take a step back and ask yourself how chemical reactions could be all there is of you ?  (Sep 28, 2016 | post #155600)

Evolution Debate

It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...

First you already have taken a position, for whatever reason , against the God of the bible that impacts heavily on your interpretation of the biblical narrative. Then you have gone ahead to conjure in your mind the kind of God you would like to be in existence, kind of setting the ground rules for him to follow. I know this is a direct result of how your thought process has been conditioned to operate, i.e make predictions for the model to fulfil , but man, the God of the bible says His ways are not our ways , even His thoughts (read mind) are far removed from ours. Your mind is far too feeble to be setting standards for Him , let alone understand Him. Look at consciousness and see if it is a readily understood concept and tell me how further away we are to understanding God. Sometime back some really respectable scientists came up with a theory, Biocentric universe theory, that really is a tentative admission (by naturalists) that consciousness is an entity separate from the body, and that it precedes the physical universe. The point am trying to drive home is that the mind (or consciousness) that configured us is highly elusive to our devises and our only connection to Him remains spiritual. Incidentally , bible describes Him as "the God who has hidden Himself". So stop placing your expectations for Him to fill in toYou see , again you raise questions emanating from a deep ignorance of the biblical position. It (bible) declares that the universe is "display unto His splendour", a " display of His awesome power" , it "declares His mighty power". Thus the vastness of space was not made for man (as you suppose here) but is a tool to show Gods creative ability and power. OTOH , the "earth was made for man to inhabit , says my bible.  (Sep 28, 2016 | post #155594)

Evolution Debate

It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution d...

I guess i too will start to ignore you. You are despicable.  (Sep 25, 2016 | post #155444)