Send a Message
to justice is just a choice

Comments

3,835

Joined

Jan 24, 2009

Badges

justice is just a choice Profile

Forums Owned

Recent Posts

El Paso, TX

Free David Leonard Wood

Trust you? Wait, hold the train, shut the front door... I'm supposed to trust an anonymous stranger on the internet? You went to school with him. Hmmm then you would know my friend's sister. What's your name and I'll see if she knows you. Let's see how bold you really are...  (Jul 2, 2017 | post #229)

New Mexico

Martinez prefers to stick to issues

How is the Las Cruces School district out of money? Shortfall? Could;ve sworn Martinez made a campaign promise to not cut funding for education or wait did she make a promise at all? Were her fingers crossed or does that matter? Either she lied or she's the worst person ever to serve as governor. What's even worse is wasn't she the Dona Ana County District Attorney? Seems she'd have some smidgen of loyalty to Las Cruces care just a little about the school system there. Though I know she doesn't care because the state had a shortfall and instead of doing the right thing she took money out of education. Somebody might want to go back and re-read some of my posts and come back to this one so i can say... ...I told you so.  (Feb 21, 2017 | post #8071)

New Mexico

Martinez prefers to stick to issues

Some may take this wrong, but the problem in the world, not just America, the problem is religious zealots. People who'd kill someone because they're of a different faith. Seems preaching and teaching aren't worth the effort. Could've sworn the teaching was to show them a better way. Murder isn't really a convincing method of teaching, just instills fear and hatred. We're supposed to help the widows, the fatherless, the homeless. Go out and help people build better lives. It's supposed to be "give a man a fish and you've fed him for a day. teach a man to fish and you've fed him for a lifetime." Well the zealots have changed it to "kill the man and take his fish."  (Jan 3, 2017 | post #8055)

New Mexico

Martinez prefers to stick to issues

Haha keep up isn't condescending. It's a challenge for you to put forth more of an effort. Thought you were in the military, you should recognize a challenge. :-) By the way thank you for your service. Back to the message, I haven't twisted anything. I'm making a quite profound statement. If marriage is a religious concept then the state/government should have no authority over it. Separation of church and state. Most people get married in churches by ordained ministers and yet come divorce, it's not handled by the church (though Catholics do annul) but the majority of divorces are done through state courts, by the government. So where's the separation. Seems what God has joined together, man has torn asunder. My argument has nothing to do with Adam and Steve, why you went there speaks to what or how you think. Sole point I was making is that the state should have no control over marriages. In effect the government is promoting the division of families. If a couple has problems, fix it through the church. Let the church handle it. Because all divorce is, is just another way for the state to make money off a problem that has a real simple solution. The government has no concern keeping families together. The government's sole concern is how it can profit off any and every activity come hell or high water.  (Jan 3, 2017 | post #8054)

New Mexico

Martinez prefers to stick to issues

Please keep up. I said I haven't been wrong...with you...I never said I've never been wrong. I haven't been wrong in one thing that I have corrected you on. I was for sure wrong when I foolishly believed Susana Martinez would do her job correctly. See how that came full circle? haha Blame God? Where did God say go out and demean others? Exactly what scripture is that? Where did I say I know it all. I know a lot of things, but I don't know everything. Funny how you have 2 Old Testament references then say "I realize old testament dudes had a lot more than one," but the scripture specifically laid out a command and yet even God's favorite had way more than one wife. Yet not the point. The point is the Bible clearly laid out the concept of marriage. Our government has a policy of "separation of church and state" well if that's true and marriage is a church ideal then our government should not be making any kind of law regarding marriage for it is clearly a religious concept, right? You just stated "bible outdates the Odyssey" which obviously means the concept of marriage was "set in stone" thousands of years ago before the United States was ever even thought of so our system of government should separate itself from it and not create any laws that affect marriage. Our government should not in any way say or create any law that holds what marriage should or should not be, right? Now I'm not setting anything in stone this is just conversation. Just something to think about.  (Jan 2, 2017 | post #8046)

New Mexico

Martinez prefers to stick to issues

Jesus was friendly to the tax collector, befriended a prostitute, he hung around and associated with outcasts. Maybe you need to reread the Bible. I know he threw people out of the temple, People whose sole goal was making money off of faith. I'm more familiar with the Bible than you believe you think I know. Again wait for it... First of all you probably are one of those people who believe in this saying "God helps those who help themselves." That doesn't exist anywhere in the Bible and fact is god mostly helped people who couldn't help themselves. Justify through scripture, hilarious! What did I say was not correct? Since you are so bold, where are your cites? Because with that statement you have seriously contradicted yourself. The Bible is quite clear, treat others the way you would like to be treated. So that means you want everyone here to disrespect you, demean you, degrade you? Is that what the bible meant? And you dare justify your callousness with the First Amendment. Seems you have forgotten that the First Amendment does not give you the right to shout fire solely to panic people nor does it give you the right to commit libel nor slander. Where did I say I was trying to bother you or upset you? I'm not attacking you, just correcting what you're saying. By the way I haven't been wrong yet. By the way if you grew up without a father then I guess welcome to the club. If your mother committed suicide I won't make a callous remark. However if these were your circumstances they obviously didn't affect you in a negative way. Seems you had a positive life that you made for yourself. Yes you had bad things happen to you, but you chose to not let them keep you down. you made a choice. Now note all I said was I've been through stuff that in now way compares to you bashing me, anonymously on an internet forum. That's all I said in other words nothing you say as an anonymous poster affects me personally. That's it. I didn't say I was better than you, I didn't say my life was worse than yours. Finally I mentioned my roof because I was describing my house where mt mother doesn't live. Since you thought I lived with my mom. That's it, so it was quite relevant. But let's stick to this issue, where in the Bible does it say marriage is one man and one woman? Where does the Bible say God only accepts marriage between one man and one woman?  (Jan 2, 2017 | post #8043)

New Mexico

Martinez prefers to stick to issues

Great. First of all, I am a Christian. That's why I know who the legit ones are, and you seem to be quite fake. A true Christian doesn't attack nor demean people the way you. Christ was very approachable, accepting of all people. He directed people to follow God, turn from sin, and help others. So far your messages are quite elitist. You appear to be knocking everyone down, placing yourself above everyone else, and condemning everything and everyone else. The message of Christ or at least the message he wanted the world to know is lost in your hatred. Now to correct you once again. My education is fine. I might slip up on English every now and then, but I majored in Applied Mathematics with a double minor in Physics and Computer Science and took enough classes to earn a teaching degree. So if you really want to debate education that's fine with me. Now for you to oddly think that my feelings were hurt because I said your remark was callous, sorry you are wrong yet again. Callous means insensitive and as someone who seems to be professing Christianity that is a stark contrast to the character of a Christian. An insensitive Christian? Does that make sense to you, of course it does because you are not a true Christian, right? See I found ti quite odd that you would even use the word "retarded " hell people who aren't Christian rarely use that word. It's called politically correct. Further you practically labeled me retarded because I made a typo. Truly strange indeed. As for living with my mother. I invite you to my house so you can see for yourself that my mother is not there. I live by myself. I'm renovating my property. I replaced my roof and by I, I do mean "I" replaced my roof. Cost about $14,000 in materials and tools. I even reframed a portion of the garage and because of the slop work I've seen I decided to become a licensed contractor. So trust me, you can't hurt my feelings. I've been through enough in my life that your words in no way can compare to any of it and will never affect me. I respond solely to point out how wrong you are. You are an anonymous stranger on the internet who obviously takes pride in trying to insult others. With me you have failed, epically.  (Jan 1, 2017 | post #8036)

New Mexico

Martinez prefers to stick to issues

While this remark truly doesn't deserve a response, I will state for someone who seems to promote Christianity this was a seriously callous remark. Something you fake Christians love to do. As for your Puritans statement. They didn't form this country's government. You might want to re-read the list of names on the Declaration of Independence. Further the Puritans were quite strict on religion. They were against other religions and even killed people of opposite faiths. So I seriously doubt they would have incorporated the "Freedom of Religion" into the First Amendment. Seems the nothing I know about the Puritans seriously outweighs what you think you believe you know. It might take you a while to figure out what I just stated. I'll repeat it so you can better understand, what you think you believe you know, not what you know, but what you think you believe you know. Wait for it...  (Dec 30, 2016 | post #8027)

New Mexico

Martinez prefers to stick to issues

Statue. Seems having to write a ton of legal documents the term statute is stuck in my head haha.  (Dec 26, 2016 | post #8013)

New Mexico

Martinez prefers to stick to issues

Well I am going to give you the benefit of the doubt and say that you since you reply to several posts that you can't keep track of "the subject" haha. To refresh your memory you had posted to someone else... "Yes and where were these other religions when this country was founded and established? Judaism perhaps but the other ones? Founding fathers were not concerned with these religions." Those are your words, not mine. You stated the founding fathers were not concerned with these religions. To which I jumped in and stated they weren't too concerned with Christianity either, To which you now reply asking why I changed the subject. What? My comment was directly related to what you had posted, where in the world do you see a change in subject? Anyway I am glad you made the above statement because it clearly shows you like every other "religious " person has this false belief that our "founding fathers" had some faith based protestant or Christian belief when the majority of them did not. The majority of the founding fathers were Masons. They were a part of Freemasonry. Maybe you should take a really good look at DC, again the District of Columbia. Do you even know who Columbia is? Columbia is the goddess of liberty which is why the logo of Columbia pictures looks exactly like the Statute of Liberty because that statute is Columbia. The "fathers " worshipped the goddess Columbia. Evidence and proof is all over DC. DC is specifically shaped like a diamond which is the inside of the square and compass symbol of Freemasonry. Most of the masonry symbols can be found in the layout of DC. The all seeing eye is also laid out in DC just take a good look at a satellite image of DC or any map and you'll find the Masonry symbols. It was done purposely. You won't find a cross or the fish or any symbol related to Christianity because that was the last thing on their mind. You can have all the faith in the world, but your faith will never erase the historical fact that our country was founded, or at least our system of government was founded by Masons not Christians nor Catholics.  (Dec 26, 2016 | post #8012)

New Mexico

Martinez prefers to stick to issues

They weren't concerned with Christianity either. Why do you think it's called the "District of Columbia"???  (Dec 23, 2016 | post #7999)

New Mexico

Martinez prefers to stick to issues

Um. Perjury is a crime or at least it's written in code in New Mexico, whether your justice system chooses to enforce it is another thing altogether. https://www.youtub e.com/watch?v=UYyr 9TSediM https://www.youtub e.com/watch?v=Medi _T-36k4 Watch both if you dare...  (Dec 17, 2016 | post #7964)

New Mexico

Martinez prefers to stick to issues

They must not teach English either. Corrected it should say "none of the teachers teach math." But hey all's fair in 'net and war. By the way "sticking to the issue" Martinez is a criminal. She committed a crime and has gotten away with it for the statute of limitations has passed. Now she can truly gloat about her criminal escapade. However like a true criminal once she's gotten away with one thing she'll do far worse cuz she thinks she's untouchable. Ah but who am I, what do I know, I'm just a common man whose only legal experience is beating Martinez at her own job, on her own court. The evidence of her crime is at the Third Judicial district Court, maybe the DA"s office, maybe the files kept by the public defender's office, but if you o looking you may not find anything...they destroy records after a certain amount of time. So as I said she gets away with it. If she could lie about this one thing, what else has she lied about. Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus.  (Dec 16, 2016 | post #7953)

New Mexico

Martinez prefers to stick to issues

Well the good thing about Martinez is that her term is coming to an end. Too bad it's 2 more years. Her presidential aspirations will have to wait cuz hers' what will happen. He has a horrible first term then people will elect a Democrat. They will totally be against the established Republican system and not want any taste of continuing that party's hold on the government. So Martinez will not have any hope at all. If Trump gets 2 terms then more than likely people will vote in a Democrat because as history has held true after 2 terms there is party switch just as here 2 terms for Obama and Republican got voted in. So after 8 years or more Martinez will definitely not succeed, she'll be too old. She may get a few votes, but lets be realistic. Voters will elect an old man, not an old woman.  (Nov 21, 2016 | post #7868)

New Mexico

Martinez prefers to stick to issues

Here's something everyone really needs to consider about this Facebook deal. No property tax for 30 years. Isn't New Mexico facing a shortfall in funding for education? Let's not forget that she also waived the fuel tax for Union Pacific. So she has no concern for the state's funding. Ah but I digress... Who can honestly say that at the end of that 30 year period Facebook will even be around to pay taxes? Hell they might say let's get out of dodge just before that period is up. Anybody even consider how rapidly technology changes everything. In 30 years they might not even need that data center. If you dare think I'm wrong...are you still using your Atari of Commodore? Those were the computers 30 years ago. Take a moment and think about it. In 30 years Facebook won't even need that building and it will be a museum. Somebody needs to go inside the guv's mansion and find out how much snake oil she's got in there.  (Sep 19, 2016 | post #7857)

Q & A with justice is just a choice

Headline:

Freedom is never free

Hometown:

El Paso, Texas

Neighborhood:

Northeast

Local Favorites:

i don't have favorites

I Belong To:

no one

When I'm Not on Topix:

something to do with basketball

Read My Forum Posts Because:

i tell the truth

I'm Listening To:

the whirring of my pc fan

Read This Book:

The Bible

Favorite Things:

basketball

On My Mind:

former district attorney now governor susana martinez is either stupid or pure evil

Blog / Website / Homepage:

www.suntropolis.com

I Believe In:

if you want something go get it period.