Send a Message
to Jon Galt

Comments

15

Joined

Jun 7, 2012

Jon Galt Profile

Recent Posts

Tuscaloosa, AL

The U.S. Senate is a criminal body and they hate the Cons...

Article VI of the Constitution which states (paraphrasing), no Senator or Representative may move to another position in the federal government if said position has had a pay increase while said the representative was in office. And this is in force until any Senator's or Representative's elected position has ended its duration. The way this is written, it would require an amendment to the Constitution to alter in any way! But, Senator Clinton was appointed Sec. of State although there had been two pay increases for said position while she was Senator and therefore she wouldn't have been eligible for the position until 2012! Since she acted as Secretary of State before 2012, then she was in violation of the law and is a criminal as are all the Senators that voted to confirm her and did not stop said confirmation!!!!!! There are now deaths that are her fault and I believe she should be charged with murder as she allowed the US Embassey in Lybia to be unprotected. But we once again face the US Senate ignoring the constitution and the Law by their potential appointment/confir mation (illegally) of Senator Kerry as Secretary of State! Where is the outrage? Where is the media? Where are the lawyers? Where is our "honest" Judicial system? Article I, Section VI of the Constitution states that it is illegal for Kerry to be Sec. of State, at least until 2015, after his term has ended! I have once again proven that the Rule of Law has ended in the US! This is a FACT! And yet, arbitrary enforcement of laws will continue and one day the Feds will come for YOU the same way the Nazis came for their citizens....at least those that were non-compliant. Enjoy the fruits of your labor and non-labor. You will receive what you deserve, as will your children, etc. The US is currently a dictatorship and yet, the people are too stupid to recognize it and they are happy as their children move to slavery and live under tyranny> Smile, you're getting what you asked for!  (Jan 24, 2013 | post #1)

Top Stories

Why do some Americans actually desire to relinquish their...

Why are so many so willing to relinquish their freedoms and liberties? I ask this because of the calls for more gun controls or even the removal of the ability to own guns. Of course this is unconstitutional, but many are to ignorant and haven't read the Constitution, if they can read (only 7% of 8th graders can read at an 8th grade level). How can so many be so ignorant of the fact that Totalitarian Governments and tyranny arise when the masses are unarmed? History is full of the abuses perpetrated on the unarmed. Do Americans actually think they'll not be more abused by the U.S. Government than they are today if they forfeit their guns? One might as well put the shackles on their ankles and wrists themselves then pass their children to the Government to indoctrinate them and never to be seen again.  (Dec 14, 2012 | post #1)

Tuscaloosa, AL

Gun Laws - Tuscaloosa, AL

This is an easy question. The Second Amendment was identified as one of our Creator's "God" given Rights, and that was because it enabled all Americans the ability to possess the firearm capability to overthrow a tyrannical government. George Washington was asked if there should be any restrictions on the sort of weapons the citizens may possess and he said, "NO! They should have anything necessary to overthrow a tyrannical government." This does not bother me in the least. But remember, possession does not allow anyone to illegally harm any other individual. I believe that you may do anything you want as long as you do not harm another in any way. Simply, your Rights end at my nose. If a crime (violence against another) is committed, then punish the perpetrator to the fullest extent of the law...no more of the wimpy probations, suspended sentences, or parole! For a crime to be committed, there must be a victim and everyone has the Right to confront their accuser/victim.  (Aug 13, 2012 | post #4)

Tuscaloosa, AL

Romney-Ryan - Tuscaloosa, AL

Read Ryan's "conservative " voting record: YES on TARP YES on Economic Stimulus Act of 2008 YES on $15 billion bailout for GM and Chrysler. YES on $192 billion additional anti-recession stimulus spending. YES on prescription drug benefit for Medicare recipients YES on extending unemployment benefits from 39 weeks to 59 weeks YES on Head Start Act YES on No Child Left Behind Act YES on making the PATRIOT Act permanent YES on allowing electronic surveillance without a warrant YES on emergency $78 billion for war in Iraq & Afghanistan YES on Budget Control Act of 2011 to raise debt ceiling Ryan may even be worse than Obama, because unlike Obama he actually understands the various financial numbers involved. And this is supposed to be a conservative and someone who's fiscally responsible? It makes Hubert Humphrey look like an Right-Wing Extremist!  (Aug 13, 2012 | post #2)

Tuscaloosa, AL

Romney-Ryan - Tuscaloosa, AL

Romney's a liberal spender and Ryan is a RINO-- look at his voting and spending record. But, they are much better than Obama, who's a communist and working to spend the U,S, into financial collapse.  (Aug 13, 2012 | post #1)

Tuscaloosa, AL

Gun Laws - Tuscaloosa, AL

Make them less restrictive. Disarm the innocent and only tyrants and criminals will have guns.  (Jul 25, 2012 | post #1)

Tuscaloosa, AL

Election Poll, June 2012 - Tuscaloosa, AL

Ron Paul - He's the only candidate talking about liberty, reductions in Government spending, and obeying the Constitution (the Rule of Law).  (Jul 25, 2012 | post #2)

Tuscaloosa, AL

Why won't organized religion push for the end of Blue Laws?

Is nobody on this site religious or have a strong enough belief in their religion to defend the religious promotion of "blue laws" and the need for the government guns to support 'God's' will?  (Jul 2, 2012 | post #2)

Tuscaloosa, AL

What form of Government doe America have today? Not what ...

Do people on this site not care abot their gvernment?  (Jul 2, 2012 | post #1)

Tuscaloosa, AL

Do fans of Finebaum know more coaches than their Represen...

Do fans of Finebaum Sports Show know more coaches than their Representatives and Senators? If so, it's scary that they can vote.  (Jun 28, 2012 | post #1)

Tuscaloosa, AL

Why won't organized religion push for the end of Blue Laws?

Why won't organized religions push for the end of Blue Laws? If religions, in general, allow for free choice when it comes to joining their individual sects because of their faith in their God and his teachings, then why do they need the Government to prevent the sale of alcohol with the threat of violence and the "point of a gun"? Don't these organized religions and their "leaders " have enough faith in their God to allow free choice? Obviously, they have little faith.  (Jun 18, 2012 | post #1)

Tuscaloosa, AL

What is the difference between the Republican and Democra...

What is the difference between the Republican and Democratic parties? It's minimal at best. Both parties speak of promises they cannot deliver, their desire for unconstitutional powers, and control of all production and wealth. Neither Party shows a deference to the Constitution or the Rule of Law. America currently has an arbitrary legal system with the accused having no idea of the rules of punishments (anarchy?). Both Parties allow criminal Representatives to remian in office. I know of Charles Rangel for one - tax evasionb for 17 years for some properties for one. Both parties allow individuals guilty of treason to run rampant throughout Washington - does anyone remember Sandy Berger? Washington needs to get past Sandy Berger berfore discussing the joke and smoke-screen od Valerie Plame. America is run by nothing more than a well-dressed group that would be better identified by the title of mafia with its dons and captains, etc. Someone please tell us where they two Parties differ. They both want power and control -- they are just working from close, but different mathods for the same goal.  (Jun 16, 2012 | post #1)

Top Stories

Prove there's a god.

This thread is such a waste of time. Who can prove the unprovable? Religions are based on faith of the unknown. What's a cult and what's a religion? At one point there was Jesus and 12 deciples--- wow, 13, was it a cult or religion?  (Jun 7, 2012 | post #507899)

Tuscaloosa, AL

Is it criminal for a politician to intentionally go again...

Given that the Constitution is supposed to be the "Law of the Land" and all Federal Agents, elected and appointed, of all branches of the Federal Government are required to take an oath to follow, obey, and protect the Constitution, then why isn't it a criminal offence for a federal agent to disobey the Constitution? Regardless what today's lawyers and supposedly "elite" Supreme Court Justices may say, the Constitution is supposed to be the "Law of the Land". Regardless what Justice Marshall wrote, the U.S. Supreme Court does not, nor have they ever had, the authority to determine the constitutionality of a law or Bill passed by the Congress. nowhere is said authority in the Constitution and there are actual words written by the Founders to the contrary. The best being, “why, given that we have established an equal seperation of powers between the President, the Congress, and the Judicial branch would we give the final deciding authority of Constitutionality to five (5) people? (Forgive me, I cannot definitively say this was Madison's or Jefferson's words from my memory). But, given that the Constitution is completely ignored daily by the Senate, House of Representatives, the President, and the Judicial branch, what are the American People to do? From what I just stated, it means elections do not matter (have they ever), the agents that ignore the Constitution have somehow been placed "Above the Law" and the Courts will not allow an American to "petition " the Government for legal action against any "Government " individual as they are immune to actions from the citizens for any "bad" behavior - heck, Government agents get promoted for their criminal activates! As a perfect example, why weren't 99 Senators charged with criminal activity for voting to confirm Senator Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State which was in DIRECT VIOLATION of Article VI of the Constitution which states (paraphrasing), no Senator or Representative may move to another position in the federal government if said position has had a pay increase while said the representative was in office. And this is in force until any Senator's or Representative's elected position has ended its duration. The way this is written, it would require an amendment to the Constitution to alter in any way! But, Senator Clinton was appointed Sec. of State although there had been two pay increases for said position while she was Senator and therefore she wouldn't have been eligible for the position until 2012! Since she acted as Secretary of State before 2012, then she was in violation of the law and is a criminal as are all the Senators that voted to confirm her and did not stop said confirmation!!!!!!  (Jun 7, 2012 | post #1)

Top Stories

Why are people unhappy?

There are many reasons people are unhappy, but I can name two that are the main culprits based on two types of individuals: 1) those that are self-supporting 2) those that depend on others for survival. I am not being critical of either group. Group 1) has a problem being happy because they are told everyday that they should be unhappy because others suffer, that's wrong, and it's their fault. These individuals (in general) have worked hard to reach the level of life they are at (the middle class) and feel good working harder to continue trying to improve their positions. But, they are told by "society " they are evil for working so hard to reach their position and should "give back" to their communities for their gains (and much of their income is stolen by the Government). The words "give back" are probably the most destructive words that be said to anyone and we hear it daily! To "give back" implies that the individual has received something they have not earned through hard work and honest production which gives an honest individual guilt, intentionally! In contrast, why can't people be asked to "give" in order that some of those less fortunate and in need are cared for appropriately. What they give is a gift rather than a return of something they stole. It's semantics, but a powerful difference. 2) Those that need the production of others to survive are generally unhappy because they are receiving something they have not "earned" . Humans, in general, are proud individuals and they prefer to receive something they have earned rather than a handout. A handout is the same as having food put in a dog or cats bowl, which tells the human they are nothing but an animal! When an individual does something productive and is then properly compensated for their work, they have a feel proud and successful; they have performed work which earned them compensation and raises them above the level of animals and into society as a productive individual! Lack of room limits further explanation, but I believe I have communicated the general points which identify a strong component of the "human" condition and what "makes" some feel happy with themselves. It is the feeling of being productive and doing so in an honest manner that does not harm others!  (Jun 7, 2012 | post #14)