Send a Message
to janeebee

Comments

8,535

Joined

Dec 22, 2009

janeebee Profile

Recent Posts

Christian

Cookie's Place

Normally I don't bother responding to the irrelevant flaming in your replies to me. But this time I made an exception because what you accuse is so easily proved false. HG: "Everything you said was a lie." Bullwinkle. Let's review the comment of mine you're claiming is entirely comprised of lies...... janeebee: "Yes, that's been an on-going, intermittent subject of discussion here. Pagan's threatened others with grievous bodily harm, and worse, many times. Her threats, her aborted attempt to carry out one such threat, her admissions of illegal drug use, and her rants on Satanism, self-worship, and indulgence in selfishness are all well-documented in her comments. So it was suggested that Social Services would take Pagan's Topix posts very seriously, as the anti-social , criminal, and amoral aspects evident in her written self-expression raise critical questions about her character. The debate ensues over whether or not a reputable child-protection agency would instigate a review of pagan's suitability to parent, based SOLEY on her conduct here. Of course, as will no doubt be seen in response to this comment, the nay-sayers attack anyone who thinks it reasonable to assume it's possible!" So tell me, 'ole HG'..... What did I say in that post that wasn't true? Just point out one single lie! Can't you?  (Sunday | post #16528)

Christian

Cookie's Place

Ugly chick platitudes"? Ridiculing /denigrating a man's masculinity by referring to a him as a female, more testifies to contempt for your own gender/self than for his. And should you reply, please spare me any of the uual jabbering jibbish I've already heard a zillion times before from you.  (Saturday Oct 18 | post #16407)

Christian

Cookie's Place

I didn't say anything about pagan that wasn't true. I just described what she's said about herself in her comments. But perhaps you deal with your animosity differently than I do mine. I take care not to let negative emotions, my own OR others', determine my actions. I prefer the guidance of reason. Clearly though, it's YOU who'll "make up" things to say about a person you don't agree with, to refute them. Not I.  (Saturday Oct 18 | post #16400)

Christian

Cookie's Place

I'm not going to keep repeating myself. But you're welcome for my having once again provided you with a comment that served as a platform from which to demonstrate your sniveling sychophancy.  (Friday Oct 17 | post #16272)

Christian

Cookie's Place

What you refer to as "your (my) unproved allegations" regarding the "lifestyle she (pagan) exposes and the views that she expresses", are documented facts pagan herself testified to in her comments. And fYi, I wasn't ADVOCATING Social Services investigating pagan!. I was simply explaining to the inquiring poster how and why the subject came to be debated in this thread. I'd ask you to forgive me for interrupting your shameless groveling.... Were I sorry.  (Friday Oct 17 | post #16266)

Christian

This Christian Forum is a absolute EMBARRASSMENT

provegodexists: "it has been proven prayers do not work... " Really? It's been "proven" ? I must've missed the publication of the scientific studies that resulted in that finding. Kindly post the link.  (Friday Oct 17 | post #295)

Christian

Cookie's Place

Yes, that's been an on-going, intermittent subject of discussion here. Pagan's threatened others with grievous bodily harm, and worse, many times. Her threats, her aborted attempt to carry out one such threat, her admissions of illegal drug use, and her rants on Satanism, self-worship, and indulgence in selfishness are all well-documented in her comments. So it was suggested that Social Services would take Pagan's Topix posts very seriously, as the anti-social , criminal, and amoral aspects evident in her written self-expression raise critical questions about her character. The debate ensues over whether or not a reputable child-protection agency would instigate a review of pagan's suitability to parent, based SOLEY on her conduct here. Of course, as will no doubt be seen in response to this comment, the nay-sayers attack anyone who thinks it reasonable to assume it's possible! xo  (Thursday Oct 16 | post #16185)

Christian

Cookie's Place

Oh yeah, you "mock" all right! But not in the one and only good sense of the word: "light-hearte d and inoffensively ". No, no, no... You "mock" in the worst sense of the word, as described by "mock's" definitions 1. through 7. YOU revile, denigrate, belittle and insult; YOU "attack with derision and contempt". If you're called on it, you CLAIM you were joking around. And ridicule your respndent for thinking otherwise!  (Wednesday Oct 15 | post #16152)

Christian

Cookie's Place

You're making fun of FSM for sympathizing with Cookie; ridiculing him for admiring her strength and perseverence in enduring years of unrelenting persecution by vicious trolling misfits like yourself and your gang. So congratulations. You're single-handedly making "Satanic witch" appear to be interchangably synonymous with nasty, dumb-ass SKANK. Still giggling, dear?  (Sunday Oct 12 | post #16005)

Christian

Cookie's Place

Cookie generates the majority of comments being posted in this thread! When you and your Cookie-obsessed gang of her non-stop detractors are here, 90+ % of the comments y'all post are about Cookie! When your gang was gone, supposedly as "an experiment", Cookie kept this thread alive. Needless to say, your little so-called " experiment" would have had an entirely different outcome had it been conducted BEFORE y'all had already run most of the other posters off this thread, rather than after.  (Saturday Oct 11 | post #15987)

Christian

Cookie's Place

What you want to do to others happens ONLY in your fantasies within your own mind, NOT in the "spirit realm". What goes on in YOUR head is FAR-removed from the realm of spirit.  (Saturday Oct 11 | post #15984)

Christian

Proof of God

blacklagoon: "... if it is undiscovered it doesn't exist." Do you realize what it is you're actually saying here? You're saying that undiscovered things DON'T exist - that there ARE no undiscovered things in existence - that everything that exists has been discovered! I don't know if that's what you meant to say, but as I see it, discovery has nothing to do with things existing. That which exists, exists whether it's discovered or not! Things CAN and DO exist undiscovered. For example..... Bacteria. Viruses. DNA. Quarks. They existed undiscovered. The proof, of course, being, that BEFORE they were discovered, they existed!  (Thursday Oct 9 | post #56)

Christian

Proof of God

That poster didn't say LOGIC confuses him. He said YOUR "logic" confuses him. blacklagoon: "Either God exists or he doesn't..." According to YOUR "logic" , the reason you don't know something exists, is because it doesn't!  (Wednesday Oct 8 | post #33)

Christian

Proof of God

blacklagoon: "Either A exits or, A doesn't exist. There is NO third choice." Of course there is! A exists unbeknowst; it has yet to be discovered!  (Tuesday Oct 7 | post #22)

Christian

Proof of God

blacklagoon: "...you are still trying to put humans and animals in a separate category..." Humans and "animals " ARE in separate catagories! Only NON-human mammals are considered "animals ". Humans are NOT scientifiically considered "animals ", nor are they scientifically referred to as such. Humans are MAMMALS. And while both humans and primates ARE mammals, primates are "animals ", humans are not.  (Tuesday Oct 7 | post #21)