Send a Message
to goaskwhy

Comments

64

Joined

Feb 19, 2012

goaskwhy Profile

Forums Owned

Recent Posts

JonBenet Ramsey

Jeffrey MacDonald Is Guilty

There is a new site that contains MacDonald information, my review is below. Crime Archives (CA) is a much better organized than Christina’s site (Jeffrey MacDonald Information Site, JMIS). The navigation of the TMIS is all screwed up, plus the SITE DOES NOT EVEN HAVE A NAME. When I go the “home” page (which has a picture of Colette, Kris, and Kim, and summarizes the case), there is no site name listed. Also, once you click off the home page, there is no link to ever take you back to it. Sometimes the navigation is on the left, other times, it is at the bottom of the page, where it just looks like a hot mess. The colors and are just hideous, the design is ugly, and it is hard to read when the text is on a black screen. I am assuming the big ugly blue, peach, and purple bar at the top is supposed to have the site name, but it has gone missing. There used to be this god awful music playing when you went to the site, I no longer have it, but there is a message about updating Java (which I won’t do, if this is related to the sappy music). TJMIS has the new uploads site with center justification, which is just a pain the neck to read. http://www.thejeff reymacdonaldcase.c om/html/newuploads .html CA new uploads site is left justified, nice and clean, and easy to read. http://www.crimear chives.net/1979_ma cdonald/uploads/up loads.html In the JMIS, the dates are often wrong, the date should be the date ON the document, NOT the date it is received. Seriously, now, which is easier to read? http://www.crimear chives.net/1979_ma cdonald/fbi/fbi.ht ml http://www.thejeff reymacdonaldcase.c om/html/fbirecords .html CA has a list of resources that shows all sorts of news articles and provides links to useful sites and information. There are NO links on TJMIS. Why is THAT exactly? The bottom line is that CA is the superior site, plus it covers cases other than MacDonald's.  (Sep 9, 2013 | post #7891)

JonBenet Ramsey

Christina Masewicz Outed As a FRAUD in the Jeffrey MacDon...

Christina's site HAS been getting been getting worse over the years. Crime Archives (CA) is a much better organized than Christina’s site (Jeffrey MacDonald Information Site, JMIS). The navigation of the TMIS is all screwed up, plus the SITE DOES NOT EVEN HAVE A NAME. When I go the “home” page (which has a picture of Colette, Kris, and Kim, and summarizes the case), there is no site name listed. Also, once you click off the home page, there is no link to ever take you back to it. Sometimes the navigation is on the left, other times, it is at the bottom of the page, where it just looks like a hot mess. The colors and are just hideous, the design is ugly, and it is hard to read when the text is on a black screen. I am assuming the big ugly blue, peach, and purple bar at the top is supposed to have the site name, but it has gone missing. There used to be this god awful music playing when you went to the site, I no longer have it, but there is a message about updating Java (which I won’t do, if this is related to the sappy music). TJMIS has the new uploads site with center justification, which is just a pain the neck to read. http://www.thejeff reymacdonaldcase.c om/html/newuploads .html CA new uploads site is left justified, nice and clean, and easy to read. http://www.crimear chives.net/1979_ma cdonald/uploads/up loads.html In the JMIS, the dates are often wrong, the date should be the date ON the document, NOT the date it is received. Seriously, now, which is easier to read? http://www.crimear chives.net/1979_ma cdonald/fbi/fbi.ht ml http://www.thejeff reymacdonaldcase.c om/html/fbirecords .html CA has a list of resources that shows all sorts of news articles and provides links to useful sites and information. There are NO links on TJMIS. Why is THAT exactly? The bottom line is that CA is the superior site, plus it covers cases other than MacDonald's.  (Sep 9, 2013 | post #40)

JonBenet Ramsey

Jeffrey MacDonald Is Guilty

I hate to say it, but mac should get a refund from Gordie. All of Gordie's responses were about as useful as Bernie's closing arguments at the trial. Like giving a fish a bicycle. This whole fiasco of Gordie's has been a complete waste of the gov's time and money. All BS, nothing new. Love how the defense made out that the hair fragments on Kris meant that each hair fragment was from one of the killers. And the gov pointed out that if that was true, then the dog hair found on Kris's bed meant that one of the killers was a dog (well, that part is true, since mac is a dog, as he behaved like one when he was married to Colette---humping anything in his path). On another subject, based on a conversation I had, it seems that the consensus is that Rebel (and her many versions of herself) on Christina's yuku board is Kathy MacDooffus. I felt it was someone that Mrs. Ice Pick Baby Murderer knew, since there seemed to be so much insider information. I thought it was a fanatical pal of Kathy's, but it was noted that KM is supposedly very ill and that coincidentally, Rebel has not been posting for the last few months. I wonder what ails the lovely little wife? (as KM used to refer to herself). I wonder if what ails her is physical or mental? Or both? Rebel/KM has a screw loose, as her comments about watching and reporting on Christina's activities during the trial came under the category of stalking. What a whack job. Rebel/Kathy thought she was too good for this world, so maybe she is making the great escape to the great beyond, and can continue to stalk in the form of a ghost.  (Sep 7, 2013 | post #7889)

JonBenet Ramsey

Jeffrey MacDonald Is Guilty

bla blaed bla blaing blaish bla bla bla. Bla blaish bla bla bla bla blaed. And repeat. I have now summarized Henri's "thoughts " on everthing.  (Nov 9, 2012 | post #7671)

JonBenet Ramsey

Jeffrey MacDonald Is Guilty

Henri lives in a fantasy world where the trial nevet took place and the article 32 was the final word. Henri can babble to himself while the rest of us live in reality.  (Nov 6, 2012 | post #7655)

JonBenet Ramsey

Jeffrey MacDonald Is Guilty

Henri- According to your wacked conspiracies, on the day of the murders, before any of the blood had been typed, knowing only mac's basic story, the CID decided that the best way to resolve the case was to make sure that there were bloody imprints of mac's and Colette's cuffs on the bed sheet. So, the CID undressed Colette, took her pjs and dipped it in her blood, took mac's pjs and dipped the cuffs in Colette's blood and then put the pj on the floor covered them with the sheet and then walked on the items to transfer the pj cuff prints to the sheet. And they were so devious that the CID didn't even bring up the pj cuff prints at the 32 hearing. Because they knew that mac would go to trial and THEN they would bring out the pj cuff prints on the sheet. Yeah, Henri, you sure are going to convince everyone that your whack theories are the truth. Sure, that is why so many people have agreed with you over the years.  (Nov 3, 2012 | post #7648)

JonBenet Ramsey

Jeffrey MacDonald Is Guilty

From his blog "Gene Weingarten, a Pulitzer Prize winning author, and a columnist for the Washington Post is preparing a profile of Brian to run soon in the Washington Post Sunday magazine." I look forward to reading this, as Brian is one of the heros in this case.  (Nov 3, 2012 | post #7647)

JonBenet Ramsey

Jeffrey MacDonald Is Guilty

The weak part is Henri's mind. Henri, why do insist and quoting the 32 hearing when it was the trial that convicted mac? Just more of your bla, bla, blaing.  (Nov 2, 2012 | post #7644)

JonBenet Ramsey

Jeffrey MacDonald Is Guilty

Flimy evidence" Says who? You? Everthing that does not fit into your fantasy world is not real. You are a true psycho. If the evidence had been flimy then the defense would have knocked it down easily. Instead they could not find logical explanations for all the "flimsy" evidence. What is "flimsy" is your mind, Henri.  (Oct 29, 2012 | post #7632)

JonBenet Ramsey

Jeffrey MacDonald Is Guilty

You accuse people of being a being alcoholics and psychology shows that people accuse others of their own failings. You have no proof that Joe M. is an alcoholic you just make up things to attack him. If he was an alcoholic he certainly is a productive one, unlike you.  (Oct 27, 2012 | post #7627)

JonBenet Ramsey

Jeffrey MacDonald Is Guilty

Oh come off it, Henri. You "think the military policeman were told to keep their mouths shut about that"? Great, now you are all seeing and all knowing. Colette was wearing her pjs, they would have been removed at the morgue. You have created a fantasy where Colett'e pjs were removed from her body, placed on the floor and the sheet placed on top of it and then MPs danced all over the sheet, causing the pj cuff imprints. Oh, and they added mac's pj top to the mix, when they danced on the sheet. And do you really think that a jury, hearing your crackpot theory would believe your crap rather than the theory that mac wore his pj top when he moved Colette's body in the blue bed sheet. You are the worst advocate for mac because you only have fruitcake conspiracy theories and NO LOGIC.  (Oct 27, 2012 | post #7626)

JonBenet Ramsey

Jeffrey MacDonald Is Guilty

Henri- According to mac, hippies don't move bodies. That is straight from the horse's ass, himself. So if the hippies didn't move the bodies that leaves mac the knife, family killer. Investigator: And as we enter the bedroom, we have Kimberly's blood on the rug--mat. To the right of the door, we have a sheet and coverlet for the bed; and on the sheet is Colette's blood and Kimberly's; and on the bedspread--isn't that correct-- on the bedspread it's Colette's blood, large quantities--both-- the hairs of Kimberly. ****Now hippies don't--they let bodies fall where they may.**** ****MacDonald: Right, I agree with you.***** Investigator: So, it is another staged scene probably. Kimberly was returned to her bed--possibly carried in the sheet. MacDonald: Couldn't that blood have been transported to that bed any other way? On the hands? Investigator: Too much of it--too much blood. It couldn't have been transported by hands--(Inaudible) --but there's blood there.  (Oct 23, 2012 | post #7595)

JonBenet Ramsey

Jeffrey MacDonald Is Guilty

Henri If the bodies were not moved then how did direct bleeding from Colette and Kim get on the bed sheet and how did the bed sheet and bedspread get balled up on the MB floor with a piece of the medical glove? Hippies don't move bodies and arrange them like they were sleeping. That is something that a person who is close to the victim does. It is a form of "undoing " the crime. The problem is that you tell us that hippies killed the family but the crime scene does not support killings by strangers to the victims. Mac claims he found his children tucked in bed. We know from the bloodstain in the MB that Kim was on the floor for while and bled there. No hippie was going to pick up a nearly dead child, wrap her in a sheet and put her in her bed and arrage the covers and then bash her head with a club. In the Manson murders the bodies were left where they died, no one put the bodies in bed and tucked the covers around them.  (Oct 21, 2012 | post #7580)

JonBenet Ramsey

Jeffrey MacDonald Is Guilty

Henri, Based on your fantasy version of the murders, mac didn't move the bodies because he is so truthful and if he had moved the bodies he would have told you so. So, that means that the drug crazed hippies moved the bodies. Except that drug crazed hippies don't move bodies. Even mac agreed with that the killers would not move the bodies. So.....who moved the bodies? After the drug crazed hippies in the living room hit mac and knocked him out on the steps to the hallway, do you really expect anyone to believe that the drug crazed hippies gently stepped around mac and then went and over killed a pregnant woman and two children? Why didn't the drug crazed hippies push mac out of the way in order to get into the hallway? Why would they stab dead bodies but leave mac alive and well on the steps? See, it is the lack of logic that convinced a jury that mac was a liar and murderer. Nothing in his story makes sense. As it has been pointed out, why would Colette yell Why are they doing this to me, instead of yelling for Help? Mac's story is pile of BS from start to finish. The jury heard his lies and they learned about the physical evidence in the trial. Nothing mac said made sense with the evidence. Of course they found him guilty. Even the Green Beret found mac guilty and mac was sure that he would find him innocent. No one who attended the trial wrote about the verdict being wrong. The proof was in the evidence. It always has been. All your wacko conspiracy theories and your constant bla bla bla have never convinced one person that mac is innocent.  (Oct 17, 2012 | post #7564)

JonBenet Ramsey

Jeffrey MacDonald Is Guilty

Jesus H. C. on a leaking raft. Henri is it possible for you to address the FACTS in this case instead of your delusions? The bloody cuff imprints on the bed sheet did not happen by brushing against Colette's cuffs. Look at the damn crime scene photos. Colette's cuffs were pushed up to her elbows, so her cuffs are not even showing on her body. So, NOTHING put over Colette's body would have picked up her cuff prints. Get that through you dense skull. The cuff imprints required PRESSURE to transfer the pattern. Not brushing up against something. There was direct bleeding on the sheet not a smear of blood. You can look at the photos that show the cuff and prints. Of course you won't because anything that contradicts your fanatsies does not exist. The sheet and bedspread were balled up together the bed sheet was never over Colette's body. When the sheet and bedspread were separated a piece of the glove fell out. No one takes you seriously because you live in a fantasy world and you ignore the facts that show that mac lied and that he was the killer.  (Oct 17, 2012 | post #7563)