Dec 7, 2006
FH Chandler's Favorites
FH Chandler Profile
He doesn't like being followed from place to place on the Internet who are always attempting to derail message threads in which he's commenting, typically in a way that illustrates they have no legitimate interest in discussing the topic? I can't imagine why that's not supposed to annoy someone. /sarcasm (23 hrs ago | post #100)
The four of you have to be the best trolls on the Internet. =D (Yesterday | post #99)
I've never caught you in a lie? As I recall when you first showed up here you were accusing me of being a pedophile, despite the fact that you don't know me and don't know anything about me. And since I'm not a pedophile, I HAVE caught you in a lie. We needn't broach the subject of your latest bout of idiocy, wherein you claimed that a HLC member stole your medical records. As that claim is wholly lacking in merit or verifiable proof, it's worthless for anything other than laughing at. But, as I've indicated before, it's really interesting, to me at least, that ever since you've been squatting here on Topix [as well as elsewhere using the utterly stupid moniker, "Matallica " - fitting for a poser as that band of posers hasn't legitimately been a metal band since the early 1990s] your story has been that when you allegedly had a blood transfusion "forced" on you, you were treated like garbage both by your family and your larger congregation when your original story that was posted to AJWRB had you as some sort of hero to your congregation for resisting, regardless of being forced, and it was cause for a great deal of improvement in your relationship with your family. You understand both versions of that story can't be true, so you'll understand if I consider you full of shit. (Wednesday | post #58)
Yeah, okay. (Wednesday | post #6)
SMB2? (Wednesday | post #2149)
I don't want to do anything about it. I posted it here before, remember? (Monday May 23 | post #9)
Isn't it still available for free online? (Monday May 23 | post #7)
Not being your brother, I wouldn't dare to speak for him; I'd never presume to express what it means for each one to be, "true to himself". That said, you could very well be the one marginalizing him. It's very likely that he, like most homosexuals, knows there is something wrong with him, he has the courage to own up to that [rather than simply giving in to what he believes to be wrong] and he has the spiritual fortitude to live his faith despite it being personally inconvenient to him. It sounds like he could be one of those very few extraordinary people in this world. (Monday May 23 | post #2001)
Okay, so you would say you're in agreement with Pastor Anderson on the subject of homosexuality, seeing as how you're made the same reference to a "reprobate mind" in line with Chapter 1 of Romans? For reference, see: https://www.youtub e.com/watch?v=Diqt FAKQHlk&featur e=youtu.be&t=2 55 (Friday May 20 | post #1738)
Are you the pastor from that video? If you are, your podium is whack. (Friday May 20 | post #1736)
That depends what you mean by, "empathize ". I don't wish ill on such people, and I'm not glad they're in the position that they're in. (Friday May 20 | post #1735)
Again, I understand him just fineThat's greatYou fundamentally disagree with the JWGB on pretty much everything, including whether or not homosexual activity is something condemned in scripture. That's fine. It doesn't mean that you're right and they're wrong - only that you disagreeAnd they're entitled to that view, and no one is saying otherwise. Those people probably may not want to become JWs. Or, if they are JWs, they may find more fulfillment outside of the sect. The sect doesn't owe it to you, or to them, to alter its practices because butthurtI suppose it's good that they have the freedom of choice to decide whether or not to remain part of the JW sect absent anything along the lines of being publicly executed, and "suffering ", at worst, hurt feelingsSometimes in life people have to make difficult choices: what matters more to me, my desire to be a part of a certain religious sect with a certain set of rules/expected behaviors that I agreed to when I "dedicated " myself, or my desire to engage in a certain type of sexual relationship. Perhaps instead of, "emotional support" [i.e., "I'm so sorry to hear what you're going through, I hope it all works out"] they may have suggested that these people on the fence make a choice and find the satisfaction that comes along with standing up for yourself and deciding how you want to identify to the world around you. Those things are things everyone has to do for themselves and, ideally, they should be doing it decisively rather than passively. Sure, that's a difficult thing to do, but what thing worth doing is less than difficult? And what is more difficult, trying to force others to change to suit you, or changing that which is within your ability to control - yourself? Yeah, you might upset some people you've probably been lying to anyway, and you might lose some people from your life; people you've never really been honest with, who don't really know you and with whom any relationship you have is built on a foundation of sand, i.e., toxic relationships. Sometimes the best gift a person can gift themselves is to extract them from a toxic relationship, either with a person or a group. (Friday May 20 | post #1733)
That you'd actually take the time to sit and write this out, even if only scant moments, says so much about you, and none of it is positiveI suspect we're close in age, and that you might actually have a year or two on meIt has nothing to do with being your elderEmphasis added] "No daddy, I am NOT lashing out like the little attention whore I am, and just so you know I'm not, I'm going to put on a show of telling you that I'm not." (Friday May 20 | post #1713)
I understand him just fineIt seems that he is the one who just wants to argue, but seemingly not in response to anything I've actually saidVery unacceptable" because you [or he] say soHe seems to think there's a great deal of "force" involved; he clearly doesn't understand what real force [much like real persecution] is all about. See his comments here: http://www.topix.c om/forum/religion/ jehovahs-witness/T IME7C15G7NSVSV98/p ost1676And? (Friday May 20 | post #1712)
You seemingly don't know the definitions of either of the items to which you refer, regardless of how many times you post a link to an inaccurate definition, or reference another term from your silly fallacy flowchart with no context. Remind me again [assuming you did so previously], what point are you trying to make - if you actually have one? That I employed an "ad hominem"? And? An ad hominem, to the extent it deals with the credibility of a statement being challenged, is not a fallacy, I'm sure you know. I'm pretty sure I made that point in my first reply to you. Do tell, what "ad hominem" did you object to, and in what way was it, "fallacious "? You see, without context, which so many of your posts seem to lack, throwing out a term from your fallacy flowchart serves no purpose. Although it seems that while chastising others for employing "ad hominems" [again, without either pointing them out or explaining why you imagine they're fallacious - which an ad hominem may or may not be], you don't mind employing them - likening those who disagree with you to being subjects of brain surgery performed by a thirteen year old, for instance. (Thursday May 19 | post #1669)
Q & A with FH Chandler
NO, YOU MOVE.
Republic of Elbonia
Just off of Krem Ln, #666
Trolls to the left of me, griefers to the right...
I Belong To:
A roving gang of Tom Brokaw clones, the 'Burt Rettig' appreciation society and the "NOBODY LOSES TO DOUGLAS CLARK" protection plan.
When I'm Not on Topix:
I'm waiting patiently for the FBI [and their KGB handlers] with hot coffee, donuts, ponchiki and Stolichnaya vodka at the ready.
Read My Forum Posts Because:
Don't worry, I'll beam my posts into your brain.
I'm Listening To:
Read This Book:
Synthetic telepathy neural decoding your every thought. EW! You just wished you could sniff my socks! Also Snake People.
On My Mind:
You mother-[expletive] communications is corrupted. Whatever. WHATEVER. YOU GOTS ME NOW!
Blog / Website / Homepage:
NadINDYa's favorite (yes, FAVORITE!) song [SUBLIMINAL MESSAGE WARNING]: http://youtu.be/gncW1zqMFgs
I Believe In:
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC