DMAshura

Gay/Lesbian

Polls show public more receptive

CALM THE HELL DOWN PEOPLE!!! Jesus Christ I've never seen so much flaming in one single topic! Stick to the topic or get out. Name calling gets you NOWHERE. It makes me sick.  (Jun 25, 2007 | post #22)

Gay/Lesbian

Born Gay?

Um... If two lions never "hooked up", lions would be extinct by now. I assume you mean "two male lions?"  (Mar 14, 2007 | post #23)

Gay/Lesbian

Brokeback Mountain kiss voted 'best ever'

Am I the only gay guy who hated Brokeback Mountain? >_>  (Feb 26, 2007 | post #10)

Gay/Lesbian

Church has duty to speak out: 'Does man not concern us, too?'

Welcome back, Bill! I was wondering if you'd lost this topic. I posted some questions to you a couple pages back. Would you please answer them? I'd be glad to repaste them if you'd like.  (Jan 18, 2007 | post #114)

Gay/Lesbian

Church has duty to speak out: 'Does man not concern us, too?'

http://www.shortpa cked.com/comics/20 060405bingo.png I call B5, N4, and N5.  (Jan 18, 2007 | post #113)

Gay/Lesbian

HOMOSEXUAL ATTACK ON CIVIL RIGHTS IN UK

Honestly, I'm all for the anti-discrimination of gays, but forcing churches to do civil ceremonies for gay couples in their halls? Uh... NO. Take it elsewhere.  (Jan 11, 2007 | post #24)

Gay/Lesbian

Honor gays in textbooks? Calif. considers

This threat is scrolling so fast I can't keep up with it...  (Jan 9, 2007 | post #8406)

Gay/Lesbian

Honor gays in textbooks? Calif. considers

I'm familiar with it... what about it?  (Jan 7, 2007 | post #8015)

Gay/Lesbian

Church has duty to speak out: 'Does man not concern us, too?'

Bill, I still await your rebuttals to my arguments.  (Jan 7, 2007 | post #83)

Gay/Lesbian

The Truth

Also, this may be useful to point out to you... an excerpt from the Terms of Service. "In addition, you agree to not use the Service to: a. upload, post, email, transmit or otherwise make available any Content that is unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortuous, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable; ... m. "stalk" or otherwise harass another;" I have flagged your posts, as these fall under Topix's Terms of Service. If you continue in this manner, you will be banned.  (Jan 7, 2007 | post #5)

Gay/Lesbian

The Truth

The text of the First Amendment reads as follows: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." Please show me, how have your First Amendment rights been compromised? Also, if I may comment... with your lack of mastery of the English language, I hardly think you would be taken very seriously in a court of law.  (Jan 7, 2007 | post #4)

Gay/Lesbian

The Truth

Would you like to show on what grounds you can sue somebody in an online forum for making posts that are critical to the United States government and its laws? There's something that we have called the First Amendment. It's a sad era in America when the legal system is used for personal vendettas over disagreements of opinions...  (Jan 6, 2007 | post #2)

Gay/Lesbian

Gov. Corzine Signs Civil Unions Law

If you can get it to sign a legal contract, let me know! ^_^  (Jan 5, 2007 | post #35)

Gay/Lesbian

Church has duty to speak out: 'Does man not concern us, too?'

How many names does Bill go under anyway? I've seen Sopot for sure, and Jim too I think... Also, anybody notice that it's a different location every time? DMAshura...  (Jan 5, 2007 | post #79)

Gay/Lesbian

Church has duty to speak out: 'Does man not concern us, too?'

First off, if you are the one proposing that the Supreme Court has rejected appeals on DOMA, you are the one who has to provide sources. You can't just tell your opponent to look for the sources himself. Therefore, I'd ask that you please post the sources you're talking about. Second of all... all interesting information on Clinton, but what does this have to do with the argument at hand? Please keep red herrings out of the argument.  (Jan 4, 2007 | post #71)