Jan 1, 2010
I'm shocked the old excuse that the Senate wouldn't vote for it hasn't showed up yet. If the Dems in the Senate voted against Impeachment that would be a good play for the GOP in the upcoming elections. They might actually win some seats instead of losing them like they will. Lets see some more desperate excuses from you nutty right wingers, come on , you can do it..lol. (Thursday Jul 17 | post #31)
Well you know old Joe is full of crap..lol. (Thursday Jul 17 | post #30)
Hannity and Rush are proud that you bought their empty rhetoric. They can't because they can't prove one charge, neither can you. (Thursday Jul 17 | post #29)
Even Cheney says no to impeachment. The GOP Establishment has spoken..lol. They have nothing to impeach him with anyway, its just a red neck's wet dream.. (Wednesday Jul 16 | post #12)
Relax cupcake, no one cares who you really are..lol. (Mar 23, 2014 | post #74)
The Republicans have been stirring up the low information voters (Yea, I'm talking about right wingers) by ignoring the checks and balances our Government has in place. Congress has more power but don't let that stop them from claiming Obama will destroy the country. Sara will hit the final nail in the Republican Parties coffin, book it. (Mar 23, 2014 | post #73)
The first thing Republicans will do, since they are against more regulations, is make a new regulation making abortion illegal. (Mar 2, 2014 | post #36)
2nd topix censor work around post. (Dec 28, 2013 | post #2)
Once again, you were lied to by the Right Wing. http://www.nytimes .com/projects/2013 /benghazi/?hp#/?ch apt=0 "Months of investigation by The New York Times, centered on extensive interviews with Libyans in Benghazi who had direct knowledge of the attack there and its context, turned up no evidence that Al Qaeda or other international terrorist groups had any role in the assault. The attack was led, instead, by fighters who had benefited directly from NATO’s extensive air power and logistics support during the uprising against Colonel Qaddafi. And contrary to claims by some members of Congress, it was fueled in large part by anger at an American-made video denigrating Islam." (Dec 28, 2013 | post #1)
To have full employment you would have to have an unemployment rate of ZERO. (Dec 2, 2013 | post #11018)
You don't know any facts..lol. "Here are the three questions I’d love your (grounded) opinions on: 1.Without a doubt we know that, according the TIGTA audit, IRS reviewers used inappropriate criteria to flag certain Tea Party 501(c)4 applications. But is that in and of itself a “clearly criminal act?” Is it even illegal? If you think so, please state what law it violated. 2.And given that the 501(c)4 organizations under review were able to continue operating as 501(c)4′ s during the review process, what are the potential damages that these groups can claim (beyond any additional legal fees and time lost responding to questions)? 3.Finally, critics suggest that this was part of a larger effort to chill oppositional speech. As the organizations were able to continue to function as 501(c)4′ s during the review period, how did this specifically chill speech?" http://www.outside thebeltway.com/ope n-irs501c4-discuss ion-crime-and-dama ges/ (Dec 2, 2013 | post #11017)
No President has ever had full employment in his term of office. Why do you lie? (Dec 1, 2013 | post #11009)
The groups were free to operate while waiting for their tax free status applications to be processed. The IRS didn't stop any group from doing anything. You are just another frightwinger spreading the propaganda. Your commie friends are proud of you. (Dec 1, 2013 | post #11008)
Q & A with District9
The (R)ich Party Lies!
When I'm Not on Topix:
Read My Forum Posts Because:
I'm not pre-programmed.
Handing right wingers their A$$ and watching wannabe hackers brag about things they know nothing about.
On My Mind:
My Fan Club is growing. Bring on the negative judge its, its my Guide that I'm pushing someone's button.
I Believe In:
Being able to think for myself.
Copyright © 2014 Topix LLC