Comments
11,312
Joined
Dec 7, 2006
Badges
Darwins Stepchild
Recent Posts
Josh Greenberger Is Right Again About Science Dishonesty
Ooooooooo...Josh mentioned my name. I feel tingly all over. (33 min ago | post #17)
It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution debate
Is Feklahr's Bedpan circling Uranus? Sorry. Couldn't resist. (44 min ago | post #19053)
Apes and men: Chromosome 2 in humans and the chimpanzee, pt 1 of 3
You still do not have a correct grasp of thermodynamics. It in no way contradicts the theory of evolution. Perhaps your straw man version of thermo, but not the real one. And you are still not thinking about the consequences of what you are proposing. (11 hrs ago | post #197)
http://farm3.stati c.flickr.com/2244/ 2275358971_a288e14 1e5.jpg (Yesterday | post #97)
You clearly haven't been keeping up with the research into abiogenesis that has been done over the last several years. (Yesterday | post #63)
It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution debate
Would you care to explain then why every fossil find we have found since...well, EVER...has fit the model of the theory of evolution. And why all the physiological knowledge we have fits ToE... And why all the bio-geographical knowledge we have fits ToE... And all the geological knowledge we have fits ToE... And all the genetic knowledge we have fits ToE... And all the biochemical knowledge we have fits ToE... And... Well, you should get the picture by now. If, as you say, ToE is SOOOOOOOOOOOOO wrong, why does everything in science keep agreeing with it? (Yesterday | post #18842)
It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution debate
Marky... Try this: Step 1: Take your birthday...day, month, and year...and add them together. Example: August 13, 1963, 8+13+1963=1984. Step 2: Pick a number between 1 and 100. Add that to the result of step 1. Step 3: Multiply the result of step 2 by 15. Step 4: Subtract 225. Step 5: Divide by 5. Step 6: Add 42. Step 7: Multiply by 6. Step 8: Take the digits of step 7 and add them together. Step 9: If the result of step 8 has more than one digit, repeat step 8. Continue until you have a single digit. Example: Step 7 gives a result of 1849. 1+8+4+9=22. 2+2=4. Stop. I predict you get 9. (Yesterday | post #18841)
Intelligent Design Documentary to Premiere at Smithsonian Affil...
And the god Vishnu is really going to be POed that you didn't worship him. (Monday | post #494)
Intelligent Design vs. Evolution: Evolution wins again. [Greg L...
That's it??? Some Bible quotes and some rather lame apologetics? That's supposed to be your absolute proof of your conception of ID? Never mind that you didn't even give a precise definition of what your conception of ID is. (Monday | post #1115)
You are making a very selective, and incorrect, interpretation of that quote. What they are saying is that while MOST mutations with a significant effect are harmful, there are some that are BENEFICIAL...which thoroughly contradicts your "theory" . (Sunday Nov 29 | post #26)
You have failed to show that the law of the excluded middle applies in this case. You are applying artificial classifications... invertebrate and vertebrate...to nature and insisting that they MUST apply in all cases. That you can not imagine an intermediate between a chordate and a vertebrate, to me, says more about your lack of imagination than the lack of such an intermediate. Is it so impossible that there could have existed (or may even exist today) a chordate with partial bony plates armoring its notochord? The fact that vertebrate embryos first develop a notochord, which is then replaced by a true spinal column is pretty good evidence that you are quite wrong. (Sunday Nov 29 | post #9)
You are really determined not to absorb any contrary information, aren't you? (Sunday Nov 29 | post #7)
It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution debate
You realize that using this "logic", Homer's Iliad and Odyssey would be considered "true" as well. Congratulations. You just proved Zeus to be real. [/sarcasm] (Sunday Nov 29 | post #18708)
Oh, Jeez. Shubee is starting to sound like Ray Comfort. <That is NOT a compliment, Shub.> Just a few references for you to read... http://en.wikipedi a.org/wiki/Evoluti on_of_sexual_repro duction http://www.pbs.org /wgbh/evolution/se x/index.html http://biomed.brow n.edu/Courses/BIO4 8/19.Evol.of.Sex.H TML BTW, Shub, one mistake here is in your thinking that individuals evolve. Wrong. It is populations that evolve. Males and females within the population remain sexually compatible. Your other mistake is in think that evolution is discreet. That one generation you have one species and in the next generation you have a different species. Wrong, again. Evolution is not discreet. Evolution is continuous (in the mathematical sense). Each generation is only a tiny bit different from its parents. So little different that they always remain sexually compatible with their parents. It is only over hundreds or thousands of generations that we see enough difference accumulating to justify calling it a different species. (Sunday Nov 29 | post #5)
Proof that the Flying Spaghetti Monster is real... http://mysite.veri zon.net/sportinlif e/postimages/fsm-m anifest.jpg (Sunday Nov 29 | post #2337)
Q & A with Darwins Stepchild
Headline:
endless forms most beautiful
Hometown:
Hilbert Space
Neighborhood:
An Open Set
I Belong To:
The Human Race
When I'm Not on Topix:
There's no telling
Read My Forum Posts Because:
I went to a lot of work writing them
I'm Listening To:
Usually...Rock & Roll
Read This Book:
"The Demon-Haunted World"
Favorite Things:
My dog Missy
On My Mind:
What did happen in the first picosecond of the universe?
Looking for more people on Topix? Browse the Family Album and see who's saying what!|
Reach local customers. Engage a specific demographic. Maximize business-to-business opportunities. Topix can deliver your message.
|
Copyright ©2009 Topix LLC
