Christopher Pearsoll

Evolution Debate

It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution debate

Evolution isn't a religion. It's science. For it be a religion, there must be some sort of invisible sky pimp, there must be no evidence in support, and everything must be taken on faith. Evolution does not meet any of these requirements, so it is not a religion.  (13 min ago | post #17570)

Evolution Debate

It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution debate

So you're going to pretend that geckos and komodo monitors are both members of the same species, since they are both lizards? That sparrows and shrikes are both members of the same species, since their both birds? That trout and angelfish are both the same species, because they are both fish? That man and chimpanzee are both the same species, because they are both mammals? That's what your doing.  (25 min ago | post #17566)

Evolution Debate

It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution debate

Of course they are still lizards you IDiot. I never said they weren't. The point, that you completely missed, again, is that evolution has been observed. You'll probably dredge up your 'it's only micro-evolution' non-arguement (as has been pointed out to you, repeatedly, the only difference between 'micro' and 'macro' evolution is timescale), assuming you bother to respond at all.  (29 min ago | post #17564)

Evolution Debate

It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution debate

Probably just a case of 'monkey see, monkey do' seeing as one of his critics has been accurately labelling his posts for the last 30 pages or so.  (2 hrs ago | post #17543)

Evolution Debate

Should evolution be taught in high school?

When I started reading all this sh*t that Tyler's been polluting the forum with, I thought for a second, that we might have a marksman wannabe. But this guy has way to much invective to be like markie, and not even half of his wit. This pathetic loser is, well, exactly that, a loser.  (10 hrs ago | post #30758)

Evolution Debate

It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution debate

Wrong again, as usual. And it's not even as if the fossil record, sufficient as it is, is the strongest support for Evolution. Evidence from genetics is much stronger than evidence from the fossil record, and it supports Evolution. Evidence from Embryology is much stronger than evidence from the fossil record, and it also supports Evolution. Evidence from animal and plant husbandry (which would count as direct observation of Evolution in action) is much stronger than evidence from the fossil record. I could keep going, of course... A number of posts ago, I mentioned a case of a population of lizards being introduced from one Adriatic Sea Island to another nearby one, and then the changes that the transplanted population accrued over a mere few decades as they adapted over just a few generations to their new home. This is direct observation of Evolution in action. I also mentioned at the same time another experiment concerning populations of E. coli bacteria adapting to altered environments. Yet more evidence for the Reality of Evolution. You, of course, either ignored it or failed to even notice it.  (Yesterday | post #17510)

Evolution Debate

It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution debate

How about we start with every time you've lied about the evidence provided for Human Evolution, Evolution in general, and your general competency to speak on any of these matters. I'm sure the rest of your critics in here (in otherwords, just about everyone else) can provide specific examples if they really want to.  (Yesterday | post #17506)

Dinosaur

Latest from dinodata.net

Then again, here's the latest from Dinodata... Dinodata's articles on Aardonyx; http://www.dinodat a.org/index.php?op tion=com_content &task=view &id=10127& Itemid=103 http://www.dinodat a.org/index.php?op tion=com_content &task=view &id=10128& Itemid=67 A new Hadrosaur from the Aguja Formation of Texas. http://www.dinodat a.org/index.php?op tion=com_content &task=view &id=10132& Itemid=103 http://www.dinodat a.org/index.php?op tion=com_content &task=view &id=10133& Itemid=67 A new Alvarezsaurid from Mongolia. http://www.dinodat a.org/index.php?op tion=com_content &task=view &id=10136& Itemid=103 http://www.dinodat a.org/index.php?op tion=com_content &task=view &id=10137& Itemid=67 An Early Cretaceous Brachiosaurid from China. http://www.dinodat a.org/index.php?op tion=com_content &task=view &id=10142& Itemid=103 And another Alvarezsaurid from Alberta. http://www.dinodat a.org/index.php?op tion=com_content &task=view &id=10143& Itemid=103  (Yesterday | post #119)

Dinosaur

Latest from dinodata.net

I seem to be finding more new ones on wikipedia than on dinodata. Very curious... Anyway, here's the latest one. http://en.wikipedi a.org/wiki/Aardony x A prosauropod from the Early Jurassic Elliot Formation of South Africa. Taxonomically, it is between Anchisaurus and Melanorosaurus and is thus related to the ancestor of all the later Sauropods.  (Yesterday | post #118)

Evolution Debate

Should evolution be taught in high school?

Another troll? They must be handing out scratch-n-sniff stickers to anyone willing to come in here and sacrifice their integrity while showing off their lack of intelligence.  (Yesterday | post #30687)

Evolution Debate

It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution debate

I got a better solution. Quit lying and we won't have to call you on your lies.  (Yesterday | post #17499)

Evolution Debate

It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution debate

It doesn't require eye-witnesses. Observation of the fossil record is sufficient.  (Yesterday | post #17498)

Evolution Debate

Should evolution be taught in high school?

Actually, it would be nice if this topic got back on topic. So I'll take a stab at it with the following; Yes evolution should be taught in High School. Any other theory that is at the very core of a major discipline gets addressed (like gravity or the heliocentric nature of our solar system) so why shouldn't the foundational principle of biology? Evolution should (and could) probably be addressed even at the elementary school level. It certainly is more deserving of discussion than any of these petty, squabbling superstitious factions that all seem hell bent on driving civilization back into the Dark Ages.  (Friday | post #30524)

Evolution Debate

It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution debate

Can you possible not lie every time you type? This is more blatant than usual for you.  (Thursday | post #17450)

Evolution Debate

It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution debate

Anybody care to hypothesize why Markie likes to come in here and embarrass himself? Is it that he is actually as stupid as he comes across? Or is his martyr complex overriding what little common sense his pedopriest has left him with?  (Wednesday Nov 11 | post #17348)