Send a Message
to Chess Jurist

Comments

12,298

Joined

Jul 19, 2008

Chess Jurist Profile

Forums Owned

Recent Posts

Top Stories

The Christian Atheist debate

He's a political consultant? Last I heard he was a former Alabama football icon and former UK frat boy turned pig farmer turned dentist turned corpse as a consequence of a deadly crash. Oh wait. Yup. He became a political consultant postmortem. Whadda guy, eh?  (2 hrs ago | post #62000)

Top Stories

The Christian Atheist debate

Surely.  (11 hrs ago | post #61902)

Top Stories

The Christian Atheist debate

One would think the frat houses at KU would object to their boys fraternizing with the hired help, eh? Don't they try to protect those young, impressionable undergrads from the riffraff? Well, it's Kentucky after all, eh?  (Sunday | post #61401)

Top Stories

The Christian Atheist debate

Ginsberg: When you find a canon 5 in a code of judicial conduct that says it applies to Supreme Court Justices, rather than just inferior court judges, let me know, dill weed. Copper Scrolls: First, it is not "copper scrolls"; it's a single scroll on two pieces of copper. And you didn't correct it; after much ridicule from me and dancing from you, you were corrected by another poster: http://www.topix.c om/forum/topstorie s/TOCO8TEGNA8I5JT6 3/post389341 And even after correction, you continued to dance. That was 2011. Yet in 2015, you were at it again, pointing to 3Q15 when asked for "texts about Jesus 'written by James and other disciples on the original copper scrolls'". http://www.topix.c om/forum/topstorie s/TOCO8TEGNA8I5JT6 3/post968203 And, again, you didn't correct it, I corrected you. Trump's Mental Issues: You're pretending, fool.  (Friday Jul 22 | post #60787)

Top Stories

The Christian Atheist debate

Of course it is, fool.  (Friday Jul 22 | post #60760)

Top Stories

The Christian Atheist debate

Dogs and cats living together!!!!  (Friday Jul 22 | post #60759)

Top Stories

The Christian Atheist debate

Should read "and what Article III actually says".  (Wednesday Jul 20 | post #59836)

Top Stories

The Christian Atheist debate

Well, now that I've disabused Crock of his nonsense about Ginsberg violating canons and Article III, who should I pick on? Oooo. Crock againWeren't you just whining about grammar, Copper Scroll Boy?  (Wednesday Jul 20 | post #59834)

Top Stories

The Christian Atheist debate

Prolly voluntary.  (Wednesday Jul 20 | post #59833)

Top Stories

The Christian Atheist debate

It's about being wrong, fool, and the inability of Crock to admit it. Much like those copper scrolls from James about Jesus he claimed existed. They don't exist, and it would have been simpler for him to admit he was wrong. But he couldn't. Ginsberg's comments were "ill-advised " but she violated no canon of judicial conduct as Crock claimed.  (Wednesday Jul 20 | post #59827)

Top Stories

The Christian Atheist debate

Correct. She did not violate it because she's not bound by it.  (Tuesday Jul 19 | post #59615)

Top Stories

The Christian Atheist debate

Then where do you get your McRibs?  (Sunday Jul 17 | post #58915)

Top Stories

The Christian Atheist debate

She's of no consequence to me one way or the other, fool. What's of consequence is Crock's nonsense, his inability to own up to his nonsense, and his gaming to avoid admitting his nonsense. But in his defense, it's a good show, eh, butt hole?  (Sunday Jul 17 | post #58818)

Top Stories

The Christian Atheist debate

You're pretending, fool. Got any canons yet to back up your claim that Ginsberg was "violating ethical canons" with her Trump comments? http://www.topix.c om/forum/topstorie s/TC9AUDQPFH0VA4UR I/post57899 Got a relevant canon the Supreme Court believes "does not apply to them because their qualifications are set by Article III of the Constitution" ? Hell, for that matter, got any Article III qualification for the Supreme Court yet? 'Tard.  (Sunday Jul 17 | post #58773)

Top Stories

The Christian Atheist debate

I'll keep that in mind.  (Saturday Jul 16 | post #58674)