Obama-Marriage Debate - Columbus, OH

[Spookhere F trolls]

Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:

<quoted text>Interior design, hairdressing, airline stewards...
It's a mystery.

Regional planning, animal rights activists, half breed bastards in the white house

[Duke for Mayor]

I see the merciful "Christian" community is well represented here.

woof

[Che Reagan Christ]

Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:

<quoted text>Interior design, hairdressing, airline stewards...
It's a mystery.

Why?

[Pollster]

It would be impossible to consider the negative impact the ideology of homosexuality has had upon American values and the American family without considering the special and unique attributes that God specifically built into the father and mother of a child, for the nurture and normal development of the child! Even a individual with a very limited interest and understanding of the bible becomes aware of the fact that, there are no scripture that pertains to homosexuals/lesbians ever being considered suitable for child rearing and or marriage! They also become aware of the fact that there are no scripture that address how a homosexual/lesbian relationship is to function! It is clear from scripture that the only instruction that God gave the homosexual/lesbian was to completely refrain from any such lifestyle! The casual reader of the bible will also become cognizant of the fact that, the bible contains hundreds of scripture showing God instructing the husband-wife-children concerning how they are to function and interact with one another! God has given clear instruction from Genesis too Revelations directing the specific responsibilities each are expected to carry out as God oversee and blesses the family he has designed it to function! The husband and wife are clearly instructed to love and respect one another, with a further view of utilizing their unique qualities as husband and wife to bring their children up in the nurture and admonition of God! With the husband being specifically instructed in Ephesians 6:4 Not to provoke his children to wrath, Which means the fathers primary responsibility before God, too his children is to lead by example, the father is not to teach his children to be wrathful, or to encourage them to be hell raisers! But he is to bring them up in the nurture and admonitions of the Lord! He is to tenderize their hearts towards God by his example of love and tenderness towards his children and wife! There is a record in Proverbs that says a child left to himself brings his mother to shame! But the father is not mentioned in that record, I may handle that section at a later time! Clearly no homosexual/lesbian relationship is ever mentioned as being suitable for marriage or child rearing! Children deserve the best, and God has shown the best way to give them that! Father know best! Even with all its faults, brought about by mans unwillingness too adhere to the standards God has set for marriage and child rearing, the heterosexual couple still provide the best soil to produce the best children for future generations of Americans! Because it is built upon unchanging truths!

Isaiah 54:13 All your children shall be taught by the Lord, and great shall be the peace of your children!

KJV

Duke for Mayor wrote:

I see the merciful "Christian" community is well represented here.
woof

[Pollster]

Duke for Mayor wrote:

I see the merciful "Christian" community is well represented here.
woof

I wanted to post for your consideration some aspects regarding the Godly beauty of children praising their mother within the marriage relationship.

As well as her husband praising her, as it should be.

Remember that scripture says that who finds a wife finds a good thing!

It is quite beautiful!

Proverbs 31:28 Her children arise up, and call her blessed; her husband also, and he praiseth her.

Here once again we see Gods intent for the family!

And there is never any mention of homosexual/lesbians being considered for these roles and commitments thru out the entire word of God.

That speaks volumes to say the least.

And we understand once again that all homosexual ideologies dirty this reality!

Clearly the homosexual ideology of homosexual/lesbian child adoption deprives the children of the Godly nurture of a father and mother in the home!

The homosexual/lesbian adoption of children is nothing more then the, state and fed legalization of child mental and emotional abuse!

Jesus Christ warned his society concerning offenses that were designed to offend children, and the consequences for those that do such!

All homosexual/lesbian adoption carry's with it both, immediate and long term consequences to the children being denied both a mother and a father, and our society suffers as a whole!

No homosexual can ever replace the maternal instincts that God created within the mother to nurture and strengthen the child and her husband!

Even within the animal kingdom, where it is impossible for animals to have biases and personal feelings regarding moral, internal, and parenting issues!

Will show by Gods design that even within the animal kingdom, offspring enjoy the rearing of both a male and female!

There can be no doubt that homosexual ideologies continues to dirty what it touches!

All homosexual ideologies, of which atheism is part of because, they both deny any moral ground regarding their unfounded positions for which they stand!

Homosexual/lesbian adoption produce secret shame and mental turmoil within children!

Children are not easily fooled!

Children clearly understand what goes on between the two bears on the other side of the wall!

No child should ever be subjected to that!

I believe it to be comparable to heterosexual domestic abuse suffered by children that, have personally witnessed domestic abuse first hand!

It creates fear confusion and hurt within the children exposed to it, as no doubt some here could witness to!

The children rise up to receive the love and nurture of their mother and call blessed! If this is not what God intended for the child, what is?

[godless by choice]

"Duke for Mayor"
I see the merciful "Christian" community is well represented here.
woof.

no foolin,mental midgets quoting from a book of fiction.

[Pollster]

godless by choice wrote:

"Duke for Mayor"
I see the merciful "Christian" community is well represented here.
woof.
no foolin,mental midgets quoting from a book of fiction.

In Luke 17:1-2 Jesus declares that “offenses will come,” but then adds,“but woe be to the one who cause offenses”.

In Matthew 18:1-10 we learn that Jesus particularly warns individuals of the dire consequences that will befall those who offend little children or young Christians!

As we consider this great atrocity that has been perpetrated against this child, we must naturally place the child's lifelong welfare and emotions first! Although when a person considers what really went on behind the scenes, one realizes that this child's future was never considered in terms of negative personal and emotional pain! As a individual looks at who the players were that, participated in this most Frankenstein of concepts, they become very aware of the fact that there were mainly four monsters involved in this lab experiment, that created this experimental child!

[1] The Elton John monster!

[2] The David Furnish monster!

[3] The Biological monster that provided the egg!

[4] The Surrogate monster that accepted the biological monsters egg!

Clearly this whole experiment that was hatched in Frankenstein's lab, was given birth based upon several personal interests at several different levels! It would be hard to identify who the chief monster was, given so many were involved! This child was clearly brought into this world based upon mans selfishness and greed! No thought, no love, no concern, no consideration for the well-being of this child was ever considered! Everyone involved got something, at the expense of the child, and with the exception of the child! Clearly the Biological and Surrogate monsters were well paid for their participation in this corrupt experiment! The other two monsters involvement was clearly driven via selfishness and corruption, driven by a desire to posses something that, because of the corrupt lifestyle both monsters have chosen to in-gauge in! God, by his wisdom and consideration for the well-being of all children has denied them! And now there is a child that one day will grow to become a very troubled and tortured soul, as the child comes too the true realization of how and why it was created, and the monsters involved in its creation! Many of whom will remain anonymous through out the child's lifetime! Jesus Christ said that there would be offenses and atrocities brought about by man and perpetrated upon children! He also said, God help the individuals that commits these offenses and atrocities against children! You may laugh and scoff and twist as you sit upon the sidelines of life! But some day there will be Godly justice for this child and the helpless! The eternal wheels of Gods justice may grind slowly, but they grind finely! There is also a fifth monster involved in this Frankenstein experiment! And its name is, Homosexual Ideology!

[Adif understanding]

godless by choice wrote:

"Duke for Mayor"
I see the merciful "Christian" community is well represented here.
woof.
no foolin,mental midgets quoting from a book of fiction.

Yes, I agree. Every book that details eye witness accounts and portrays history with likely some hyperbole is a book of fiction. It's a good thing those Christians didn't name the book "Theory of a god or hypotheses of life"- otherwise use godless atheist might confuse it for what we see in science.

Mental Midgets, I like it. I guess their mental powers are not strong enough to imagine connections between thing written in a book by someone else like fossils to prove evolution from a single cell as an indisputable fact like ours is. Well, long live the big bang. Oh, and don't forget to go to the church of global warming- There will be a synopsis on the Gaia hypothesis and a QA time to help everyone figure out the best ways to push it for political gain.

[Pollster]

godless by choice wrote:

"Duke for Mayor"
I see the merciful "Christian" community is well represented here.
woof.
no foolin,mental midgets quoting from a book of fiction.

Here is further evidence that all homosexuals have been responsible for the abuse of children within the Catholic church. And as I have shown the church has cleverly tried to blame pedophiles. When in fact the evidence will clearly show the abuse was done at the hands of the homosexuals within the system. And you must remember that all homosexuality and homosexual pedophilia involve male on male sexual conquest. And again the only difference is the age of their victims. But the truth concerning this smokescreen of homosexuals within the church will speak for itself.

Catholic Church's issue is homosexuality, not pedophilia

By: Bill Donohue

Anthony Stevens-Arroyo says I am wrong to challenge elite opinion on the subject of priestly sexual abuse. The conventional wisdom maintains there is a pedophilia crisis in the Catholic Church; I maintain it has been a homosexual crisis all along. The evidence is all on my side, though there is a reluctance to let the data drive the conclusion. But that is a function of politics, not scholarship.

Alfred Kinsey was the first to identify a correlation between homosexuality and the sexual abuse of minors. In 1948, he found that 37 percent of all male homosexuals admitted to having sex with children under 17 years old. More recently, in organs such as the Archives of Sexual Behavior, the Journal of Sex Research, the Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy and Pediatrics, it has been established that homosexuals are disproportionately represented among child molesters.

Correlation is not causation; it is an association. So to say that there is a correlation between homosexual orientation and the sexual abuse of minors is not to say that being a homosexual makes one a molester. Indeed, as I have said many times, most gay priests are not molesters, but most of the molesters have been gay. In other words, although sexual orientation does not cause sexual abuse, the fact that there is a relationship between homosexuality and the sexual abuse of minors cannot be ignored in dealing with this problem.

Think of it this way. We know there is a correlation between being Irish and being an alcoholic, but that doesn't mean all Irishmen are, or will become, alcoholics. But it does mean they have a special problem in this area. Does this now make me anti-Irish?

When the National Review Board released its findings in 2004 regarding priestly sexual abuse, Robert S. Bennett, the noted attorney who headed the study said, "There are no doubt many outstanding priests of a homosexual orientation who live chaste, celibate lives, but any evaluation of the causes and context of the current crisis must be cognizant of the fact that more than 80 percent of the abuse at issue was of a homosexual nature." Were they wrong to draw this conclusion?

Furthermore, the National Review Board explicitly said that "we must call attention to the homosexual behavior that characterized the vast majority of the cases of abuse observed in recent decades.

[Pollster]

godless by choice wrote:

"Duke for Mayor"
I see the merciful "Christian" community is well represented here.
woof.
no foolin,mental midgets quoting from a book of fiction.

Given the most recent conviction of the homosexual pedophile Jerry Sandusky. Is there really much difference between what he did and what homosexuals are teaching school children?

Should male on male sodomy really be introduced to school children?

Should not school children be left to grow and flourish as God intended?

Can homosexuality really be normal if it has to be taught and forced upon school children?

It seems that heterosexual children have done quite well without being indoctrinated as children as to what is proper. If homosexuality is normal, then wouldn't it stand to reason that natural selection would balance it all out without someone being required to be educated about the lifestyle?

Will Sandusky and the homosexual become the new societal norms of our culture?

Sure there is age and consent involved.

But from what we have seen so far is that really a bridge to far?

After all it does seem as though they are lowering the age of consent every day.

Have you ever asked yourself the question, why are the homosexuals in the schools?

Why is it so important for them to be in the schools?

And why grade schools?

If their going to be in the schools, should it not at the very least be in the high schools?

Should children in grade school have to deal with the sex lives of the adults?

Children no doubt have been exposed to the atrocities of the homosexual pedophile Jerry Sandusky via TV, news paper etc. Would it be unreasonable for them to not make the connection between Sandusky and what their being taught in school concerning homosexual sodomy?

And you must remember that children are not easily fooled.

I realize these are very troubling questions for any parent.

But you will be required to expose and teach your children about them at some point. Is the acceptance of these things as there taught to your children really love?

Should not the interest of the children be put first?

Should the tender minds of the children be so twisted and contorted for something as inessential to our culture as the Sandusky's and other homosexual pedophiles?

Should we teach school children that polygamy would also be an acceptable lifestyle for them to consider.

After all polygamist make the same claim that the homosexual and the homosexual pedophile make. And that is that their lifestyle and desires are based upon love.

But what is love?

Are there any boundaries to love?

And what or who sets those boundaries?

Is there a right and proper sexual and moral conduct? And who or what determines what that right, proper and moral conduct is?

And since homosexuals and homosexual pedophiles in the truest sense produce no children. Should children be taught that marriage and family are unimportant?

That marriage and family are inessential to our culture norms?

Is that love?

And we know that all civilizations thru out antiquity have been based upon the family and not the individual. Should that societal norm now be changed to accommodate the corrupt inessential desires of the individual within a society?

Is that love?