Gun Control Debate - Boise, ID

Discuss the national Gun Control debate in Boise, ID.

Would you support a ban on handguns?

Boise opposes
Oppose
 
55
Support
 
3

Vote now in Boise:

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Dave

Sioux City, IA

#1 Sep 25, 2010
The second amendment, the right to keep and bear arms.
Dave

Gillette, WY

#2 Sep 27, 2010
Heller vs. D.C. and McDonald vs. Chicago mean that a ban on handguns is unConstitutional, and cannot happen. To ban handguns, anti rights people would have to repeal the Second Amendment.
Andy

Beaverton, OR

#3 Sep 27, 2010
The most effective self-defence tools should be available.
John

Boise, ID

#4 Sep 29, 2010
are you kidding?
REED

Cascade, ID

#5 Sep 29, 2010
There is no need for gun control here.People in this area understand what guns can do and what they are for.
Carrells Machine LLC

Meridian, ID

#6 Oct 1, 2010
Why would anybody vote for it!
Resume Writer

Saint Clair, MI

#7 Oct 4, 2010
If you need a professionally written resume or cover letter, please visit my website.

I offer great services at very low prices:

www.resumedesignservice.com

I'm posting on this website because I don't have the money to advertise anymore. I really need the opportunity to work, so please take a look at my website.

Thanks for your time.

By the way, I wouldn't vote to ban guns. As long as they are responsibly controlled, guns actually prevent crime.
Tim

Phoenix, AZ

#8 Oct 12, 2010
A gun ban only punishes the innocent and does nothing to stop crime. How about we ban criminal behavior instead and allow law abiding citizens to be free as they should be.
Ron Dunn

Middleton, ID

#9 Oct 28, 2010
Violates my right to protect myself or family. Also violate my rights as provided by the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution.
Nichole M.

Morgantown, WV

#10 Oct 28, 2010
Banning handguns certainly won't stop the criminals or the "bad guys" from carrying. In my opinion that leaves us in an obviously terrible position. Being a law abiding citizen will make u a defenseless target
Billy

Bend, OR

#11 Jan 13, 2011
Punish criminals not handguns and law abiding citizens.
shooteronthegras syknowle

Twin Falls, ID

#12 Jan 19, 2011
Against my constitutional rights.
j. eselles

Meridian, ID

#13 Jan 19, 2011
Guns do not bleed...people bleed. Also, macho men with firearms are packing two sex pistols.
Peacenic

Meridian, ID

#14 Jan 19, 2011
Dave wrote:
The second amendment, the right to keep and bear arms.
A supreme court decision handed down allows firearm possession. The actual language of the ammendment does not even suggest that everyday fools can be allowed such atrocious and foolhardy persons to have firearms. Read the Constitution. Macho gunfreeks ARE NOT MILITIA
Cervelo

Carmichael, CA

#15 Jan 19, 2011
Peacenic wrote:
<quoted text>
A supreme court decision handed down allows firearm possession. The actual language of the ammendment does not even suggest that everyday fools can be allowed such atrocious and foolhardy persons to have firearms. Read the Constitution. Macho gunfreeks ARE NOT MILITIA
You strike me as the type far more concerned with hydroponics than guns. Maybe MTV has a forum more your speed.
Ian

Boise, ID

#16 Jan 24, 2011
Banning guns will not stop violence. people can commit murder with a woodcutting axe, a chainsaw, a baseball bat a golf club a car. does that mean we must ban anything that can kill a person. People kill people, it does not matter what their tool is. people that will break the law to kill people what not be opposed to breaking the law to own a handgun. Armor piercing fully automatic weapons are not legal for civilian ownership. did that stop the Hollywood bank robbers from using them to kill police officers? NO. Australia banned all firearms and confiscated them from its people. Gun-related crimes went up after that by a large sum of about 33%.
Law

La Vista, NE

#17 Jan 29, 2011
Peacenic wrote:
<quoted text>
A supreme court decision handed down allows firearm possession. The actual language of the ammendment does not even suggest that everyday fools can be allowed such atrocious and foolhardy persons to have firearms. Read the Constitution. Macho gunfreeks ARE NOT MILITIA
Really? Maybe you need to read the 2nd Amendment. It does not affirm the right on the militia.
juhi

Dehra Dun, India

#18 Mar 11, 2011
nobody has a right to infringe other's right to live..be human
WASP

Irvine, CA

#19 Mar 13, 2011
Why should only law enforcement and criminals have guns as I've never heard of a case where calling 911 actually saved someone who had a gun to their head. Self-defense is primarily your responsibility and always will be.
warrant

Dallas, TX

#20 Mar 13, 2011
juhi wrote:
nobody has a right to infringe other's right to live..be human
That's right. To disarm someone and leave them open to be preyed upon is inhuman.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Boise Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Boise Immigration Rally Draws Hundreds, Call fo... (May '13) 2 hr swedenforever 63
Lawmakers hear heated testimony about sex-orien... Jan 27 The real zeke 6
Hundreds testify in Idaho Capitol for 'Add the ... Jan 27 Evilgelicalling 9
Are Californians The Root Of Idaho's Evils? (May '06) Jan 26 The real zeke 3,162
Arizonas Rich Rodregues tells all to cheer lead... Jan 18 Quisnos Republic 3
Media Blows Up Isolated Incidents of Police Abu... Jan 18 Quisnos Republic 22
Review: 24 Hour Boise Locksmith Jan 18 MRMan1 1

Related Topics

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]