Unnatural. Everyone is naturally born a certain sex; marriage between one of each sex is required for continuation of the species. If some are confused about their sexual identity there are clinical ways to deal with it or just live and let live but no good reason to change the definition of marriage. Homosexuals can make their own contracts but should not impose upon society to adjust thousands of years of cultural norms to accommodate their underdeveloped sexual identity problem. Career politicians have jumped on the issue for votes.
"Unnatural. Everyone is naturally born a certain sex"
Yes you are born m or f...however hardly unnatural to be homosexual...1500 species of animals have been found to have homosexual members in them... so while not "common" hardly unnatural.
"marriage between one of each sex is required for continuation of the species."
What an absolutly stupid statement
A) marriage is required?... tell that to all the unwed mothers out there.
B)homosexuals make up less than 5 percent of the population.. do you REALLY think that 95 percent cant keep society going?
C) Show me one state that requires you to have children in order to get married.....
D) If going by your statement "marriage between one of each sex is required for continuation of the species."... One would guess you mean that since ssc can not "naturally" have children they should not marry....
f so would you deny marriage to anyone not able to have children?
"dentity there are clinical ways to deal with it "
Realy... show me one medically proven clinical way to "deal" with it. Not some mumbo jumbo "pray thegay away" deal.. but one with medically proven research....
"just live and let live but no good reason to change the definition of marriage. "
Many good reasons
A) They are american citizens. As such they deserve the same rights and privledges afforded to other citizens. One such privledge is the ability to enter into a civil contract which is what marriage is.
B) They are not changing any definition... Marriage is a contract between two individuals... as such it is gender neutral party of the first part party of the second.
" Homosexuals can make their own contracts"
Would those "contracts" give them the same rights as married people?...
"should not impose upon society to adjust thousands of years of cultural norms to accommodate their underdeveloped sexual identity problem"
Actually you got it backwards.. It is society who should not force their antiquated views of marriage on them. Unless you can tell me why a group of american citizens should be denied the rights given to others...
Go ahead try... this will be fun
"accommodate their underdeveloped sexual identity problem."
Got ANYTHING to back that up...besides your bigoted viewpoint. I mean a study by a neutral source that actually shows that being homosexual is a " underdeveloped sexual identity problem." Thought not