Gay Marriage Debate - St. Louis, MO

Discuss the national Gay Marriage debate in St. Louis, MO.

Do you support gay marriage?

St. Louis opposes
Oppose
 
272
Support
 
245

Vote now in St. Louis:

Comments
521 - 532 of 532 Comments Last updated -
First Prev
of 27
Next Last
come on now

Bolingbrook, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#573
May 11, 2013
 
Brian_G wrote:
I don't lie and I don't defame my political opponents; this is where we differ. I've read many posts from C.O.N. and other same sex marriage supporters who believe truth is secondary to 'gay rights'.
How is saying that a guy who resigned for having an extamarital affair, resigned for being a heterosexual not lieing.... Homosexual couples cheat on each other... are they being heterosexual to...
You never did say how cheating is heterosexual

Also you said the 14th explicitly said women were not equal. I have asked you to show me where it said that.. youhavent. Lie again

My saying you are a liar is not defaming you.. it is defining you... major difference

Ironic your comment about truth being secondary... since you have seldom posted any truths and when asked to back your statement up you dont... I guess to you truth is secondary to your posts.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#574
May 12, 2013
 
come on now wrote:
How is saying that a guy who resigned for having an extamarital affair, resigned for being a heterosexual not lieing.... Homosexual couples cheat on each other... are they being heterosexual to... You never did say how cheating is heterosexual
If the affair is with an opposite sex partner, it's heterosexual.

.
come on now wrote:
Also you said the 14th explicitly said women were not equal. I have asked you to show me where it said that.. youhavent. Lie again
I've quoted the second section many times, C.o.n. ignores the words. Rights listed in that section are reserved for adult males; there's no gender or age equality in the Constitution.

.
come on now wrote:
My saying you are a liar is not defaming you.. it is defining you... major difference
I believe C.o.n. is mistaken, he believes his political opponents are liars; this is where we differ. I don't defame my political opponents.

.
come on now wrote:
Ironic your comment about truth being secondary... since you have seldom posted any truths and when asked to back your statement up you dont... I guess to you truth is secondary to your posts.
I'm not here to answer all C.o.n.'s questions; that has nothing to do with truth of falsehood.
come on now

Bolingbrook, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#575
May 13, 2013
 
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>If the affair is with an opposite sex partner, it's heterosexual.
.
<quoted text>I've quoted the second section many times, C.o.n. ignores the words. Rights listed in that section are reserved for adult males; there's no gender or age equality in the Constitution.
.
<quoted text>I believe C.o.n. is mistaken, he believes his political opponents are liars; this is where we differ. I don't defame my political opponents.
.
<quoted text>I'm not here to answer all C.o.n.'s questions; that has nothing to do with truth of falsehood.
If the affair is with an opposite sex partner, it's heterosexual."
No sorry he had an affair... yes it is heterosexual.. how ever you said HE RESIGNED FOR HETEROSEXUAL BEHAVIOR. CHEATING IS NOT H.S. BEHAVIOR. No more than it is homosex. bhaviour.

've quoted the second section many times, C.o.n. ignores the words. Rights listed in that section are reserved for adult males; there's no gender or age equality in the Constitution."

B.S. You have said "it does however what you write is not true. You said it SPECIFICALLY states women are not equal... where... it does not say that.. infact how can it say that if women are not mentioned?... lie lie lie

ieve C.o.n. is mistaken, he believes his political opponents are liars; this is where we differ. I don't defame my political opponents."

Once again not telling the truth... I do not believe my "oponents" are liars.... Only thes who prove themselves to be... and that sir would be you. I do not defame you... I define who your are.

I'm not here to answer all C.o.n.'s questions; that has nothing to do with truth of falsehood"

You have not answered ANY of them... you parce words, skate around direct questions yet never EVER hvave you you answered the questions. Till you do I will continue tohold your feet to the fire

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#576
May 13, 2013
 
I never wrote: "women are not equal", those are Con's words, not mine. I wrote there is no gender equality right in the US Constitution.

BTW, here's another example of leftist behavior:

The IRS admits to ‘targeting’ conservative groups, but were they also ‘leaking’?
Matt K. Lewis

A little over a year ago, I reported that,”It is likely that someone at the Internal Revenue Service illegally leaked confidential donor information showing a contribution from Mitt Romney’s political action committee to the National Organization for Marriage, says the group.”

Now — on the heels of news the IRS’s apology for having targeted conservative groups — NOM is renewing their demand that the Internal Revenue Service reveal the identity of the people responsible.

“There is little question that one or more employees at the IRS stole our confidential tax return and leaked it to our political enemies, in violation of federal law,” said NOM’s president Brian Brow, in a prepared statement.“The only questions are who did it, and whether there was any knowledge or coordination between people in the White House, the Obama reelection campaign and the Human Rights Campaign. We and the American people deserve answers.”

Recent reports indicate the IRS may have begun targeting conservative groups as early as 2010.

In a 2012 speech, Sen. Mitch McConnell noted,“The head of one national advocacy group has released documents which show that his group’s confidential IRS information found its way into the hands of a staunch critic on the Left who also happens to be a co-chairman of President Obama’s re-election committee. The only way this information could have been made public is if someone leaked it from inside the IRS.”

And so, the next question may be this: If the IRS was targeting conservative groups — as they now admit to doing — were they also leaking information?

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/13/the-irs-adm...
come on now

Bolingbrook, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#577
May 13, 2013
 
Brian_G wrote:
I never wrote: "women are not equal", those are Con's words, not mine. I wrote there is no gender equality right in the US Constitution.
BTW, here's another example of leftist behavior:
The IRS admits to ‘targeting’ conservative groups, but were they also ‘leaking’?
Matt K. Lewis
A little over a year ago, I reported that,”It is likely that someone at the Internal Revenue Service illegally leaked confidential donor information showing a contribution from Mitt Romney’s political action committee to the National Organization for Marriage, says the group.”
Now — on the heels of news the IRS’s apology for having targeted conservative groups — NOM is renewing their demand that the Internal Revenue Service reveal the identity of the people responsible.
“There is little question that one or more employees at the IRS stole our confidential tax return and leaked it to our political enemies, in violation of federal law,” said NOM’s president Brian Brow, in a prepared statement.“The only questions are who did it, and whether there was any knowledge or coordination between people in the White House, the Obama reelection campaign and the Human Rights Campaign. We and the American people deserve answers.”
Recent reports indicate the IRS may have begun targeting conservative groups as early as 2010.
In a 2012 speech, Sen. Mitch McConnell noted,“The head of one national advocacy group has released documents which show that his group’s confidential IRS information found its way into the hands of a staunch critic on the Left who also happens to be a co-chairman of President Obama’s re-election committee. The only way this information could have been made public is if someone leaked it from inside the IRS.”
And so, the next question may be this: If the IRS was targeting conservative groups — as they now admit to doing — were they also leaking information?
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/13/the-irs-adm...
women are not equal", those are Con's words, not mine. I wrote there is no gender equality right in the US Constitution."

The difference here is......
Andyolu are lieing (aagain) on the gender equality... where does it say that... POINT IT OUT DIRECTLY. DO NOT put something and give your warped spin where does it say that?

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#578
May 13, 2013
 
Again, the second section of the 14th Amendment explicitly lists rights for males but not females. Look closely, the same sentence lists rights for adults but nor for minors.
DJ

Lake Saint Louis, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#579
May 14, 2013
 
Goes against God and evolution
come on now

Bolingbrook, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#580
May 14, 2013
 
Brian_G wrote:
Again, the second section of the 14th Amendment explicitly lists rights for males but not females. Look closely, the same sentence lists rights for adults but nor for minors.
The rights listed are taken care of by the 19th... so once again you lie.

YOU SAY that it means that they are not equal that is YOUR interpretation YOURS ALONE. Now show where it "explicitly" (better look up that word becaause obviously you do not know what it means) show s .

ex·plic·it (k-splst)
adj.
1.
a. Fully and clearly expressed; leaving nothing implied

So unless you can show where it says women are not equal to men... not you poor interpretation of bending the words to meet your means... YOU LIE.
come on now

Bolingbrook, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#581
May 14, 2013
 
DJ wrote:
Goes against God and evolution
Since
A) we are not a theocracy and
B) evolution is a theory...
And since neither of which matters in the law.....
you "point" is irrelevant
Sean

Saint Louis, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#582
Oct 19, 2013
 
[QUOTE who="BRENDA <3."]THE BIBLE SPEAKS: LET EVERY MAN HAVE HIS OWN WIFE, AND EVERY WOMAN HAVE HER OWN HUSBAND. IT DIDN'T SAY THE OPPOSIT. THAT'S THE BIBLE....THAT IS THE BOOK. WE ALL WILL ONE DAY HAVE TO FACE JESUS ONE DAY. I CANNOT JUDGE ANYONE. ONLY GOD CAN. NOW YOU DECIDE. IT'S YOUR LIFE......IT'S YOUR CHOICE.......NOW YOU CHOOSE.[/QUOTE]
Well why don't you live by your bible and allow the rest of us to live our own lives and make our own decisions. We'll let God decide our own fates when that time comes. If you don't like the idea of same sex marriage, "don't get married to someone of the same sex."
Sean

Saint Louis, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#583
Oct 19, 2013
 
Brian wrote:
One abomination of nature is the same as the next. If Man on Man or Woman on Woman is ok, then sure, there is nothing wrong with Man boy love, or horse on Woman, or Man Dog etc etc. We either have rules that are based on nature (sex is for procreation) or we have no rules. And you dorks saying if you can't have kids you can't marry it's not if you can't have kids, it is that having kids sets the order of nature to ignore that is to ignore all rules or morality. However there should be no such thing as marriage in the eyes of the law, it should be between a person and his/her God and family.
If everyone only had sex with the intention of reproducing we would have 50 billion people walking the planet and we would all be starving to death because our planet can't sustain the resources we all need to survive for that amount of people. So maybe homosexuality was created by God with the intention of controlling the population.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#584
Oct 19, 2013
 
Same sex marriage supporters are now suing Christian wedding vendors who decline an invitation to same sex wedding rituals.

Same sex marriage is the death of freedom.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

First Prev
of 27
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

St. Louis Jobs

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]