Gay Marriage Debate - Russell Springs, KY

Discuss the national Gay Marriage debate in Russell Springs, KY.

Do you support gay marriage?

Russell Springs opposes
Oppose
 
704
Support
 
648

Vote now in Russell Springs:

“Psalms 27:14 HOPE! ”

Since: Dec 11

Cincinnati, Ohio

#17428 Oct 10, 2012
Redux wrote:
<quoted text>Is this you Patty?
Ezekiel 23:19-2
Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses. So you longed for the lewdness of your youth, when in Egypt your bosom was caressed and your young breasts fondled.
you think disrespecting the word of GOD makes you look 'cool'?

"The wicked shall be turned into hell, and all the nations that forget God." Psalms 9:17

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#17429 Oct 10, 2012
carpenter wrote:
<quoted text>Yes I have alot to contribute here ,Without our (Me ,Earl,Pattie) you & your VILE buddies would just runamuck & think that everything is just A ok .Well its NOT .You & buttbuddies are not going to tell us what we must accept .We will never let it go ,because it is the NASTIEST VILE BLASPHEMIST thing on earth .SO in other words there is NOTHING you contribute here .
I have no butt buddies, as you say, being a heterosexual man in a marriage and have been in marital relationships all my life, since I was 22, with women. I have no interest at all in homosexuality or being involved in homosexual acts personally. I co not even currently know any gays.

I, however, do know that homosexuals exist. They are normal people, with a different sexual orientation than the majority of people, and otherwise function just the same as everyone else, and are due the very same respect and rights as are all other people, as long as they obey the laws of society which all people are subject to.

Many countries (in fact most) have had laws which discriminated and persecuted against gays, and these break all rules of human rights and common decency, and many countries are righting these wrongs to those people, as is the USA, though it is dragging its feet on the ultimate full change in every state (which will 100% guarantee happen).

It would be intelligent of you (though possibly not possible due to lack of same) to refer to posters on this site as individuals, because the vast majority of people who are supporting equal rights for gays are heterosexuals. That many of us support equal rights for gays, as all good people should, is not an indication that we are all of the homosexual orientation.
Lily the aborter

Phoenix, AZ

#17430 Oct 10, 2012
Pattiecake58 wrote:
<quoted text>
or that my ex cheated cause i was frigid......MY GOSH lady how horrible is that? what makes you think you can say all those things and not expect a reply of defense?
I did not say your ex cheated on you because you are frigid. I said maybe that was why he cheated on you (you say he did cheat but that could be another lie) because you are frigid. I am not talking about sex here. If you would look up the word you would see I meant that you were:'without warmth of feeling; without ardor or enthusiasm'. Your mind went to a sexual definition of the word (no surprise)when I was saying that you are a cold person. You show that coldness everytime you post.
Pattiecake58 wrote:
<quoted text>
you are mentally off if you think you can accuse someone YOU DON'T EVEN KNOW as being an abuser of their elder parent.......
you hit rock bottom with that one.
I never, ever said you abused your elderly parent. Ever. Now you have crosssed a line, you liar. Show me where I say that you abused your mother. Mooching is not abusing. It is mooching. You are the one that should be ashamed of yourself. You keep accusing me of things I never said or did. I thought actions like that are considered sins in your religion? I know that lying is considered a sin. And you keep lying. Everyone posting here can see you are making crap up and accusing me of saying or doing those things. Wow...you need to learn to practice what you preach.
Pattiecake58 wrote:
<quoted text>
you dished it out with great delight, and when i stood up for myself, you started playing the role of the victum.
just stop it.
I dished it out with great delight? Now you can read my mind? Seriously? I have never played a victim role. That is your game. I just point out when you lie about things I do and say. The examples above are just a fraction of your lies. Maybe you should shut up while you still have a tiny bit of dignity left.
Oh and FYI...you are not my mother or the moderator of this board so you can take your "just stop it" and shove it.

“Psalms 27:14 HOPE! ”

Since: Dec 11

Cincinnati, Ohio

#17431 Oct 10, 2012
car painter wrote:
<quoted text> who said we (gays) demand acceptance? We demand the rights every american citizen is entitled to, to marry who they love no matter the gender.
really? and where does this 'right' to marry the same sex come from?
you call it a 'right'......... equality.
and yet never in the ENTIRE history of America was it ever deemed as a 'right'.
to this day only 7 states out of 50 see it as a 'right'.
if you lived in the middle East you would not have that 'right'.
even Australi recently voted NO on it.
a large portion of the planet doesn't see SSM as a 'right'.

so what i want to know is if you don't believe in GOD and HIS utlimate law for creation, then what authority do you get this 'right' from?

what makes it SO FOOLISH is that by the same standards polygamist can (and have) felt and feel the exact same as gays feel, that it is their RIGHT to have it legal to have multiple spouses.
but did our nation see it as a right ever? no
by the same FEELINGS gays go on, incest, pedophila, prostitution, beastiality, or wacko's who think they should legally be allowed to marry a toaster feel the same way gays do..........
does that make it right? no. lots of people believe POT should be legalized... just because you think you have a RIGHT to marry the same sex doesn't mean it is the right thing to do.
thats the point here. Someone has to decide that.....and up until recently the world has taken its instruction from the creator of mankind, and rightly so.

making something a legal right, does NOT always mean it is right.

“Psalms 27:14 HOPE! ”

Since: Dec 11

Cincinnati, Ohio

#17432 Oct 10, 2012
boooots wrote:
<quoted text>
Why don't you leave this site? You have nothing of worth to contribute here.
you might not agree with others boooots but EVERYONE has the same right to voice their thoughts here.

“Psalms 27:14 HOPE! ”

Since: Dec 11

Cincinnati, Ohio

#17433 Oct 10, 2012
no big O wrote:
<quoted text>
"if you didn't demand acceptance the gays would not be DEMANDING laws were implimented to PUNISH anyone who opposes it."
Which laws in particular are you refering to..... I do not see ANY law punishing anyone oppose to it.
"why do you think gays should be allowed to redefine MARRIAGE as the state constitutions have ALWAYS defined as 'one man and one woman' since the establishment of America"
They want to get the same benifits offered by their own government. Not redefine in the m.f. sense but in the legal sense of contract law... MAJOR difference,(tho i doubt you would understand)
" understand gays don't see the wrongness of it, because they have chosen to IGNOR the words of GOD who designed us to be compatable with the opposite sex in how we are 'designed"
I know you have been told this TIME AND TIME AND TIME again. Your Bible is meaningless when it comes to the law. They do not ignore the "word of God",,, as it is not part of the law.
"T if gays are allowed to marry same sex then it would only be right if every citizen had that same 'equality', right?
so by your standard of equality for all people, then polygamy, incest, beastiality, pedophila, prostitution, all of it should be legally allowed.
the goal you are aiming toward is MORAL ANARCY."
Oh not the slippery slope arguement... anything but that....
Please. Each and EVERY one of what you wrote can be shown to have adverse effects to society. What adverse affect is there to ssm... REAL QUANTATATIVE, NOT THAT MADE UP IN YOUR MIND.
Oh btw...while back you said you would not post as often... yet anohter lie you tell
which laws? you should go on line and research all the ongoing law suites where gays are suing people for opposing it....and they mask it under 'discrimination'.
we all have a right to discriminate against ANYthing we don't like or deem as wrong.
i can protest spinich if i want to.
i can discriminate against it, because i simply don't like it.
and no one can force me to buy it, cook it or eat it.
and todays world is overflowing with endless discrimination suites because 2 gays couldn't make a christian business accomidate them one way or the other.
or someone in school said aloud the bible is against it.
or someone in the work place said their faith taught them it was wrong......
and gays will RUN to seek punishment upon anyone who opposes it.
when Prop 8 in cal passed AGAINST it... the gays demanded the courts turn over the signed petitions of names and addresses of those who voted it down, so they could harass them and even issue death threats......it was on the flippin news then.

“Psalms 27:14 HOPE! ”

Since: Dec 11

Cincinnati, Ohio

#17434 Oct 10, 2012
no big O wrote:
<quoted text>
"if you didn't demand acceptance the gays would not be DEMANDING laws were implimented to PUNISH anyone who opposes it."
Which laws in particular are you refering to..... I do not see ANY law punishing anyone oppose to it.
"why do you think gays should be allowed to redefine MARRIAGE as the state constitutions have ALWAYS defined as 'one man and one woman' since the establishment of America"
They want to get the same benifits offered by their own government. Not redefine in the m.f. sense but in the legal sense of contract law... MAJOR difference,(tho i doubt you would understand)
" understand gays don't see the wrongness of it, because they have chosen to IGNOR the words of GOD who designed us to be compatable with the opposite sex in how we are 'designed"
I know you have been told this TIME AND TIME AND TIME again. Your Bible is meaningless when it comes to the law. They do not ignore the "word of God",,, as it is not part of the law.
"T if gays are allowed to marry same sex then it would only be right if every citizen had that same 'equality', right?
so by your standard of equality for all people, then polygamy, incest, beastiality, pedophila, prostitution, all of it should be legally allowed.
the goal you are aiming toward is MORAL ANARCY."
Oh not the slippery slope arguement... anything but that....
Please. Each and EVERY one of what you wrote can be shown to have adverse effects to society. What adverse affect is there to ssm... REAL QUANTATATIVE, NOT THAT MADE UP IN YOUR MIND.
Oh btw...while back you said you would not post as often... yet anohter lie you tell
baloney, civil unions were implimented to offer gays the same legal rights without redefining or changing Marriage...that was not their goal or all they wanted.
they not only want to change the law, change marriage, they want it accepted and accomadated BY EVERYONE regardless of their faith and beliefs.

kinda like the Sodomite men surrounding Lots house and shouting and DEMANDING they have the 2 men angels carnally or else they would kill Lot.

good news there was the angels blinded them all.......because of the wickedness of it.

yes i am very understanding of the fact MANY don't acknowledge GOD or the bible.
that doesn't change truth one iota.

law breakers ignor the laws everyday because they don't believe in them as right.......thats no big surprise.
before time began on earth, there has been an ongoing battle between GOOD and EVIL, GOD and Satan........
but you are so busy milking the flesh you don't see the big picture.

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#17435 Oct 10, 2012
I wish to thank Patty for linking us to those excellent sites regarding the homoseuxality lessons that are provided in some schools. The first link said the videos were not available but they were on the other sites.

Firstly, I am really impressed by the maturity of these elementary school kids. When they were discussing the "judge" scenario, I found they seem much more mature than I thought kids at that age actually are (guess too long since I have been that age, and we certainly never had classes discussing anything to do with anything about sex in elementary school back over 50 years ago when I went).

I found that the teachers shown presented the material in a very responsible manner, although, I am not 100% certain that I would go quite as far as to actually celebrate Pride in the schools. That is probably taking sexuality a bit beyond the level of an elementary school child to over-emphasize homosexuality, but the teaching program itself "should" be mandatory in all schools, both public and private, for any citizen of the country.

Whether the right wing element in society like it or not, what the kids are being taught is reality. Gays really exist, they really have relationships, they really do get married (where they can now legally do so; otherwise they live in common-law relationships), they really have children living with them, in many situations.

Reality cannot, nor should it, be kept from children, because, as one person stated, these are the future adults and they need to grow up with proper knowledge of what really exists in society.

I don't think there was any attempt to indoctrinate the kids to become gay themselves though it seems obvious that some indoctrination to treat all people fairly is going on (is that wrong?). Besides being gay cannot be taught, it can only be part of a person's being, which they will discover as sexual feelings start to occur as they mature.

If that form of lessons was on the list of things to be approved for Ontario kids, I would support it 100%. My hat is off to whoever designed that course, as I think it is excellent.

“Psalms 27:14 HOPE! ”

Since: Dec 11

Cincinnati, Ohio

#17436 Oct 10, 2012
boooots wrote:
<quoted text>
I repeat, you have nothing to contribute here, and you are a disgrace to your country with your bigoted attitudes. No, I am not gay, nor am I in the least interested in a gay relationship. I oppose bigotry, persecution, and homophobia by jerks such as yourself.
oh booots you will never learn..........
never understand........
you are on a southern thread. the Southern people are GOOD people, proud, hard working, and GOD believing. you are in the WRONG place to be spewing this sexual immorality garbage.
we in the south are MOSTLY moral minded and God fearing folks.
you will be treated with hospitality, but you won't be tolerated when you try to sell your new age, heathen, doctrine of demons here.

“Psalms 27:14 HOPE! ”

Since: Dec 11

Cincinnati, Ohio

#17437 Oct 10, 2012
Lily the aborter wrote:
<quoted text>
When did you find out you are gay Pattie/Yellodog? Because you are the one who 'began this thread'. You are such a liar.
<quoted text>
How can you live with yourself knowing that you are a huge lying hypocrite? Yellodog is just another one of your socks, you admitted it.
HAHAHAHAA talk about CLUELESS.....no i didn't start the thread
it was a TOPIX POLL.......i reponded to the POLL QUESTION as in first in line.

and it began with a SCRIPTURE in GEN 2

so no, i am not gay you imbecil.......... i am as straight as they come.......

“Psalms 27:14 HOPE! ”

Since: Dec 11

Cincinnati, Ohio

#17438 Oct 10, 2012
Lily the aborter wrote:
<quoted text>
I did not say your ex cheated on you because you are frigid. I said maybe that was why he cheated on you (you say he did cheat but that could be another lie) because you are frigid. I am not talking about sex here. If you would look up the word you would see I meant that you were:'without warmth of feeling; without ardor or enthusiasm'. Your mind went to a sexual definition of the word (no surprise)when I was saying that you are a cold person. You show that coldness everytime you post.
<quoted text>
I never, ever said you abused your elderly parent. Ever. Now you have crosssed a line, you liar. Show me where I say that you abused your mother. Mooching is not abusing. It is mooching. You are the one that should be ashamed of yourself. You keep accusing me of things I never said or did. I thought actions like that are considered sins in your religion? I know that lying is considered a sin. And you keep lying. Everyone posting here can see you are making crap up and accusing me of saying or doing those things. Wow...you need to learn to practice what you preach.
<quoted text>
I dished it out with great delight? Now you can read my mind? Seriously? I have never played a victim role. That is your game. I just point out when you lie about things I do and say. The examples above are just a fraction of your lies. Maybe you should shut up while you still have a tiny bit of dignity left.
Oh and FYI...you are not my mother or the moderator of this board so you can take your "just stop it" and shove it.
please do not try to back out of what you said,
and i want you to EXPLAIN how it is YOU KNOW i am 'frigid'. Go ahead explain how it is YOU KNOW such a thing.

and then i want you to EXPLAIN the difference between "Celibacy" and "Frigid".

you are dishonest. you said my EX cheated because i was frigid.
that is in reference to SEX not feelings or ethusiasm.
why are you not being honest about what you DID say?

regardless you are in no position to 'define' my private life UNLESS you are a part of it.

you have No knowledge of whom i associate with or go out with or care about in my life. yet here you are making false assumptions based on what? YOUR PERSONAL dislike of me.
not only is that preposterous its just down right mean spirited.

“Psalms 27:14 HOPE! ”

Since: Dec 11

Cincinnati, Ohio

#17439 Oct 10, 2012
Lily the aborter wrote:
<quoted text>
I did not say your ex cheated on you because you are frigid. I said maybe that was why he cheated on you (you say he did cheat but that could be another lie) because you are frigid. I am not talking about sex here. If you would look up the word you would see I meant that you were:'without warmth of feeling; without ardor or enthusiasm'. Your mind went to a sexual definition of the word (no surprise)when I was saying that you are a cold person. You show that coldness everytime you post.
<quoted text>
I never, ever said you abused your elderly parent. Ever. Now you have crosssed a line, you liar. Show me where I say that you abused your mother. Mooching is not abusing. It is mooching. You are the one that should be ashamed of yourself. You keep accusing me of things I never said or did. I thought actions like that are considered sins in your religion? I know that lying is considered a sin. And you keep lying. Everyone posting here can see you are making crap up and accusing me of saying or doing those things. Wow...you need to learn to practice what you preach.
<quoted text>
I dished it out with great delight? Now you can read my mind? Seriously? I have never played a victim role. That is your game. I just point out when you lie about things I do and say. The examples above are just a fraction of your lies. Maybe you should shut up while you still have a tiny bit of dignity left.
Oh and FYI...you are not my mother or the moderator of this board so you can take your "just stop it" and shove it.
what IS wrong with you? when you accuse someone of 'mooching' off their elderly mother, that is accusing me of abusing her.
anyone who would mooch off a elderly parent would be considered abusing.........so YES you DID accuse me of abusing my mom when you accused me of mooching off her.
are you so UNaware of what you are saying on here that you don't think before you speak?

“Psalms 27:14 HOPE! ”

Since: Dec 11

Cincinnati, Ohio

#17440 Oct 10, 2012
boooots wrote:
I wish to thank Patty for linking us to those excellent sites regarding the homoseuxality lessons that are provided in some schools. The first link said the videos were not available but they were on the other sites.
Firstly, I am really impressed by the maturity of these elementary school kids. When they were discussing the "judge" scenario, I found they seem much more mature than I thought kids at that age actually are (guess too long since I have been that age, and we certainly never had classes discussing anything to do with anything about sex in elementary school back over 50 years ago when I went).
I found that the teachers shown presented the material in a very responsible manner, although, I am not 100% certain that I would go quite as far as to actually celebrate Pride in the schools. That is probably taking sexuality a bit beyond the level of an elementary school child to over-emphasize homosexuality, but the teaching program itself "should" be mandatory in all schools, both public and private, for any citizen of the country.
Whether the right wing element in society like it or not, what the kids are being taught is reality. Gays really exist, they really have relationships, they really do get married (where they can now legally do so; otherwise they live in common-law relationships), they really have children living with them, in many situations.
Reality cannot, nor should it, be kept from children, because, as one person stated, these are the future adults and they need to grow up with proper knowledge of what really exists in society.
I don't think there was any attempt to indoctrinate the kids to become gay themselves though it seems obvious that some indoctrination to treat all people fairly is going on (is that wrong?). Besides being gay cannot be taught, it can only be part of a person's being, which they will discover as sexual feelings start to occur as they mature.
If that form of lessons was on the list of things to be approved for Ontario kids, I would support it 100%. My hat is off to whoever designed that course, as I think it is excellent.
how sick you are.
any one who thinks it is OK to steal a childs innocence and have them deal with ADULT matters is a person who should NEVER be allowed to have children or be around them.

and as always you missed the point those links were showing you
that homosexuality is mandated as a CIRCULUM in the class room to kindergarden age CHILDREN.
thats a sick society that believes that should be.
no big O

Bolingbrook, IL

#17441 Oct 10, 2012
Pattiecake58 wrote:
<quoted text>
which laws? you should go on line and research all the ongoing law suites where gays are suing people for opposing it....and they mask it under 'discrimination'.
we all have a right to discriminate against ANYthing we don't like or deem as wrong.
i can protest spinich if i want to.
i can discriminate against it, because i simply don't like it.
and no one can force me to buy it, cook it or eat it.
and todays world is overflowing with endless discrimination suites because 2 gays couldn't make a christian business accomidate them one way or the other.
or someone in school said aloud the bible is against it.
or someone in the work place said their faith taught them it was wrong......
and gays will RUN to seek punishment upon anyone who opposes it.
when Prop 8 in cal passed AGAINST it... the gays demanded the courts turn over the signed petitions of names and addresses of those who voted it down, so they could harass them and even issue death threats......it was on the flippin news then.
which laws? you should go on line and research all the ongoing law suites where gays are suing people for opposing it....and they mask it under 'discrimination'.
No you should be able to back up your outlandish statements with facts. Wait who am I kidding... like that will happen.,
we all have a right to discriminate against ANYthing we don't like or deem as wrong.
Really, so a public school can tell black kids not to come... after all right to discriminate....
A company can tell a women not to apply as they do not hire women even if qualified... after all right to discriminate.
i can protest spinich if i want to.
Ya protest and discrimination are two different things...
"i can protest spinich if i want to.
i can discriminate against it, because i simply don't like it.
and no one can force me to buy it, cook it or eat it."
The fact that you are using a vegitable annalagy in it self says loads about you and your position. If you do not eat a vegitable it is your personal choice.... major difference
"odays world is overflowing with endless discrimination suites because 2 gays couldn't make a christian business accomidate them one way or the other."
Ya there are some suits out there... however what you fail to point out is the law... you see the ones being sued are breaking a law. If you are taling about the new mexico photographer case, the court ruled that she was breaking the New Mexico Human Rights Act. The NMHRA prohibits businesses offering services to the public from discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation.... So are you in favor of people breaking the law?.....
Or perhaps you are speaking of the Ma. case where the catholic church backed out of a sale of the property when they found out that the property was to be used for something they did not like. The deal had been struck price offered and agreed to... then they backed out.... clear breach of contract... again against the law... You a law breaker Patty?
"gays will RUN to seek punishment upon anyone who opposes it.
when Prop 8 in cal passed AGAINST it... the gays demanded the courts turn over the signed petitions of names and addresses of those who voted it down, so they could harass them and even issue death threats......it was on the flippin news then."
You mean the petitions that were public record... they asked to see a public record.. to see if the signatures were legit... say it isnt so.. They ask for a lawful request......
Now IF somone harrased someone on the list...arrest them.. they broke the law... wait you are for law breakers.
Earliminator

Russell Springs, KY

#17442 Oct 10, 2012
LEEEETS GET READYYYYY TO RUUUUUMBLE.And in this corner, hailing from the underbelly of life The gays ,AAAAAND in this corner the undisputed undefeated mega heavyweight champion of the universe GOD . ring the bell .

Since: Jul 12

Daytona Beach, FL

#17444 Oct 10, 2012
boooots wrote:
<quoted text>
They also ask if you have had sex with several people or with people who you do not know the sexual history of if you are heterosexual. A lot of AIDS was spread by blood transfusions in the early days after AIDS first became known, so they have to be sure that you are not at risk before taking your blood.
That doesn't mean that gays are evil or that they shouldn't have equal rights.
You must be a young child considering your manner of posting, and not overly intelligent.
It means that someone who may be contaminated with the HIV virus are a risk as a blood donor.
They also ask if you've been out of the country or had a tattoo in the last year.

Since: Jul 12

Daytona Beach, FL

#17445 Oct 10, 2012
carpenter wrote:
<quoted text>Yes I have alot to contribute here ,Without our (Me ,Earl,Pattie) you & your VILE buddies would just runamuck & think that everything is just A ok .Well its NOT .You & buttbuddies are not going to tell us what we must accept .We will never let it go ,because it is the NASTIEST VILE BLASPHEMIST thing on earth .SO in other words there is NOTHING you contribute here .
Honest question:

Do you respect the rights of other people to believe or not believe any religious affiliation they choose?

Since: Jul 12

Daytona Beach, FL

#17446 Oct 10, 2012
Pattiecake58 wrote:
or how a democracy opperates..........we the people, of the people, for the people)
i disagreed with the Supreme Court way back changing and making abortion legal, the legalization of killing innocent life in the womb.
and now you are seeing the people (who have a conscience and heart) fighting it and NOW there are several states passing laws in their state to define LIFE at conception, calling it the PERSONHOOD law...... it is a slow changing tide but things are changing with abortion, new laws, cut off funding in many places, and eventually that will flip flop back to where it should be....illegal.
my point is when a Government can mandate laws that the people have no say in, thats dictatorship.
and i sure don't want to loose my freedom to vote on issues that effect society.
so i am satisfied and glad it is as it is.
you keep saying we should'nt vote on it.....but we do.
and as long as we do, then that makes it a PUBLIC matter.
surely you understand that.
"We the People" includes gay and lesbian citizens...fyi. Wasn't sure if you were aware of that. It seems not.

Don't get me started on reproductive rights. Those "personhood" bills would criminalize women who miscarry. If a woman had a miscarriage and it was discovered by a medical professional, they would be reported and investigated for being suspected of intentionally terminating their pregnancy. Those kinds of bills have alleged good intentions but they are SO flawed. Plus, no one fully agrees on when life begins. Some nuts think that if you waste sperm by masturbating you're wasting a potential life. Or if you discard frozen eggs from a reproductive clinic, those are lives murdered.

Then you have the Republicans who want to make every woman give birth to every baby and then take away all the social programs that help them survive once they're born. They might as well say, "We care about your fetus, but your baby is welcome to die."

Dictatorship? What do you think our country would be if our government dictated what women can or cannot do with their vaginas and reproductive organs?? Who has the right to decide what goes on down there? White, middle-aged, male Republicans? My vagina says 'NO.'

You Republicans always gripe about wanting LESS GOVERNMENT, blah, blah, blah, but when it comes to controlling people, you're all about passing God's rules as laws for everyone, despite the fact that our Constitution provides protection from that kind of thing. You want less government...in your churches so you can push more government into people's body cavities. I am a Christian, but I am not *that kind* of Christian. I would be ashamed to be a Christian who demanded control over non-Christians like that.

This is not the time to be taking on the topic of abortion. We have an economy to fix first, anyway.

I'm stepping off my soap-box now. Thank you for your attention.
carpenter

Russell Springs, KY

#17447 Oct 10, 2012
Peace-Love-Happiness wrote:
<quoted text>
Honest question:
Do you respect the rights of other people to believe or not believe any religious affiliation they choose?
It does not bother me what you believe or if you disagree with me .I could care less .But I will aurgue my point regardless.
Earlytimes

Russell Springs, KY

#17448 Oct 10, 2012
Four score & 300yr ago our forfathers stepped foot on this continent .& then the gays showed up .(Abraham Lincoln)

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Russell Springs Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Bible study rules for public schools proposed (Feb '10) 48 min Bosses 135,622
looking to buy broken ps3 for parts or broken f... (Nov '11) 20 hr Caleb 30
News Taylor Man Arrested in Connection with Pyles Mu... (Oct '12) Apr 16 Greg Miller 47
People that let their dogs roam the neighborhood (Nov '13) Apr 16 dzbbgirl 6
Bruss North America (Oct '11) Apr 15 confused 69
Things being discovered Apr 15 shazzam 4
Lake Cumberland state resort park Apr 15 Statepark 1
Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]