Gay Marriage Debate - Hemet, CA

Discuss the national Gay Marriage debate in Hemet, CA.

Do you support gay marriage?

Hemet opposes
Oppose
 
46
Support
 
40

Vote now in Hemet:

First Prev
of 4
Next Last
T

AOL

#1 Jul 29, 2010
everyone was created equal
River

Hemet, CA

#2 Jul 29, 2010
I feel that we as a society don't have the right to judge someone else and tell them that they can't marry the person that they love. Nobody ever tells straight people that they can't marry someone. Banning gay marriage is immoral and you people should be ashamed of yourselves.
River

Hemet, CA

#3 Jul 29, 2010
It's completely wrong to judge someone and tell them that they can't marry someone that they love. Straight people never get told that they can't marry someone especially the person that they love. What does allowing gay marriage hurt anyways?
Sister Straight

Rancho Cucamonga, CA

#4 Jul 30, 2010
Marriage should be left the Christian way and that is between one man and one woman.
Heathen

Nuevo, CA

#5 Jul 30, 2010
Sister Straight wrote:
Marriage should be left the Christian way and that is between one man and one woman.
You've never heard of a gay Christian?
hemet res

Hemet, CA

#6 Aug 1, 2010
you all must be gay. so sad for you
On The Right Side

Los Angeles, CA

#7 Aug 1, 2010
God did not create man and man or woman and woman need anyone say more
WALTERP

United States

#8 Aug 1, 2010
heck my folks live there
Alex

Murrieta, CA

#9 Aug 1, 2010
Because marriage should only remain as a business transaction... y'know the way marriage was initially intended... right.

People just don't know their history when it comes to having a traditional marriage. I support love. Marriage has evolved from becoming a business transaction to what it is and what it will become. I support it fully.
Ben Dover

Banning, CA

#10 Aug 2, 2010
man and woman only.
Jesus

Calabasas, CA

#11 Aug 2, 2010
thou shall not judge
Gross

Banning, CA

#12 Aug 2, 2010
Alex wrote:
Because marriage should only remain as a business transaction... y'know the way marriage was initially intended... right.
People just don't know their history when it comes to having a traditional marriage. I support love. Marriage has evolved from becoming a business transaction to what it is and what it will become. I support it fully.
Than why stop at humans? What about a man and goat, or a woman and horse? Love is love right? Quit beating around the bush and go all the way than.

Your ass is ment to push crap out not push it in.
joe

Calabasas, CA

#13 Aug 2, 2010
your wifes mouth is for eating not sucking my c*ck but that dont stop her

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#14 Aug 2, 2010
To each there own
Pat Olivas

Huntington Beach, CA

#15 Aug 2, 2010
Sister Straight wrote:
Marriage should be left the Christian way and that is between one man and one woman.
The Christian way? What makes you state that one man and one woman is the Christian way?
Pat Olivas

Huntington Beach, CA

#16 Aug 2, 2010
On The Right Side wrote:
God did not create man and man or woman and woman need anyone say more
Yes, more should be said. According to the old testament, God created man and woman to procreate. No where does it state that this means marriage is between one man and one woman.
perspective

Anza, CA

#17 Aug 3, 2010
Nor does it limit it to human/human, right?

I think it was pretty well documented that Adam and Eve were two humans, one male and one female.

That is if you believe in an old fairy tale!

I am not religious, but I do believe that homosexuality is against NATURE'S laws and rules.

Try to mate 2 male dogs, cats, birds, fish, whatever, and you get nothing.

Try the same with 2 females, same result.

It's the law of NATURE, not the law of religion that makes me say homosexuality is wrong!

BTW, Darwin was RIGHT!
Alex

Murrieta, CA

#18 Aug 4, 2010
Quite honestly, how can an animal truly love a human being? They enjoy the company, but they do not love. You try to push an agenda by making idiots think that animals loving humans is the same as two consenting adults who understand what is going on is the same as a man and an animal.

I mean, kids as young as 14 can get married in some midwest states. Some people just after they turn 18 can get married in this state while they're still in high school. That sounds like your speed, right? As long as they're male and female while they can barely comprehend society and their final exams they are allowed to get married? That's what you believe right?

By the way, humans are not alone in "gay sex" but female elephants will help each other in masturbation. Dolphins will have sex with their own gender and sometimes women and young children because they are that playful. Nevermind that the way male lions determine dominance between the two is through anal sex and the alpha males put the hot beef injection into the other males to show that they're weaker.

Yeah, it's unnatural for anything to be against your belief system... and my name is bigotry. Get a room with you and Glen Beck. You might just both be sexually repressed enough that you two would have sex and then deny it later.
Flawfle

Marina Del Rey, CA

#19 Aug 9, 2010
perspective wrote:
Nor does it limit it to human/human, right?
I think it was pretty well documented that Adam and Eve were two humans, one male and one female.
That is if you believe in an old fairy tale!
I am not religious, but I do believe that homosexuality is against NATURE'S laws and rules.
Try to mate 2 male dogs, cats, birds, fish, whatever, and you get nothing.
Try the same with 2 females, same result.
It's the law of NATURE, not the law of religion that makes me say homosexuality is wrong!
BTW, Darwin was RIGHT!
This is funny, how can you say something that occurs in nature is against 'nature's law'.

Let's think about something for a second here, overpopulation. We're coming to a point in the world where there are frankly just too many people, look at China where the government enforces a one child policy in some areas.

So, we're a civilized species that's not struggling to survive, in fact we're thriving so well that the world is starting to become overburdened with our kind in some areas, now you have homosexually crop up, and, like you said, you get nothing, now let me ask you- what exactly is wrong with that? You get nothing, you relieve the planet of another person, you don't contribute to world hunger or overcrowding or anything. In our modern society propagating the species isn't exactly priority 1, and in some places can be outright detrimental, so why is it wrong?
James

Hemet, CA

#20 Aug 21, 2010
It's none of my business what people do in private but I don't think the union between two men or two women should be called "marriage." It should be called something else. If "gay marriage" should be allowed then so should polygamy. If a woman or man is bisexual then they cannot be completely fulfilled unless they have both a male and female lover. Same thing just more people.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 4
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hemet Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Water main Break Shadow Mountain Way 2 hr hemetone 2
John HunnemanHUNNEMAN: Trying to make Christmas... Sat mary 1
corruption with Riverside county CPS Sat gmaliscious 6
Hemet - The worst city to live in california Sat Joe Hemet 13
Marinello Schools of Beauty in Hemet is a Rip... (Jan '11) Dec 19 fairplay 6
One of Two Suspects Arrested in Jack-in-the-Box... Dec 19 SJ THEBOy 9
Residents Of Hemet, San Jacinto Still Cleaning ... Dec 19 Chris 2
Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]