Gay Marriage Debate - Greeneville, TN

Discuss the national Gay Marriage debate in Greeneville, TN.

Do you support gay marriage?

Greeneville opposes
Oppose
 
527
Support
 
268

Vote now in Greeneville:

Comments
7,561 - 7,580 of 7,622 Comments Last updated -

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7895
Mar 19, 2013
 
John Eberly wrote:
<quoted text>
If queers would only take their own advice.
If I could invent a machine that would allow you to sodomize and abort yourself at home, I could sell it to your kind and do the world a big favor, and make an honest buck too!
You'd never leave home with a Sodombort machine attached to your orifaces.
Predictably, you'd soon be agitating for public support for your electric bill. I would support a marriage license between you and a Sodombort machine. Your Sodombort love would be non-toxic to the environment.
Just wondering... How do you feel about heterosexual couples who enjoy anal sex? Are they "queer" too?

Are there other "queer" behaviors that heterosexuals engage in besides abortion--maybe sex before marriage, divorce, eating pork?

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7896
Mar 19, 2013
 
John Eberly wrote:
<quoted text>
If queers would only take their own advice.
If I could invent a machine that would allow you to sodomize and abort yours.
Whack- a-doodle-do.
come on now

Bolingbrook, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7897
Mar 19, 2013
 
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Just wondering... How do you feel about heterosexual couples who enjoy anal sex? Are they "queer" too?
Are there other "queer" behaviors that heterosexuals engage in besides abortion--maybe sex before marriage, divorce, eating pork?
Believe it or not he is stupid enough to believe just that. Not only that but if a woman has an abortion... forget the fact that she most likely had to have hetersexual sex... she is a lesbian
John Eberly wrote:
<quoted text>
If you do queer activities, you are queer.
It's that simple.
In particular, abortion and sodomy are intrinsic queer behavior.
If a male sodomizes a woman, he is queer.
If a woman does an elective abortion, she is queer.
It was shyster LGBTQ that nullifed local and state laws requiring fitness testing as a precondition for a marriage license.
Marriage license fitness disqualification criteria included evidence of elective abortion, STD, conviction for sodomy, and prostitution.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7898
Mar 19, 2013
 
brandy russell wrote:
<quoted text> although children know the difference, they don't discriminate until ppl like you try to force them to see your point of view... my children are very accepting of everyone...they were raised that way... I don't force them to think or believe anything... when they get older they will make up their own minds about who they love and who they spend their lives with... have you ever been married?? I'm just curious if you truly understand the concept of marriage outside of what books tell you... its about way more than gender...
Brandy, are you serious???

I 'force' children to discern the difference between their parents and ss couples???

No wonder you are having a hard time distinguishing between relationships.

Here are some differences that I have learned from being married 36 years and yes, from books. But mostly just common sense...

If you
believe denying marriage to a relationship
will prevent love

If you
demand any committed relationship
has to be called marriage

If you
claim rights and benefits can only be acquired
by an imposition on marriage

If you
equate the diversity of two genders
with the redundancy of same genders

If you
desecrate the sacred tradition of all major religions
and violate the historic practice of every single culture in history

If you
believe a fundamental change to the building block of society
will have absolutely no affect

If you
think a law can change
the reality of crucial distinctions in relationships

If you
pretend duplicating sexuality
is the same as blending masculinity and femininity

If you
condemn some children to parents of only one gender
and deliberately deny some children one natural parent

If you
ignore the design of sexual union
to manipulate a harmful act

If you
violate evolution's law of reproduction
to equate a genetic dead end

If you
risk the healthiest human relationship
to include one of the unhealthiest

If you
parallel the sole birthplace of every other relationship
with one that can reproduce none

If you
dilute all these things
down to just 'a committed relationship of two people'

Then, and only then, can you equate same-sex unions with marriage.
lifes a beach

Lebanon, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7899
Mar 19, 2013
 
John Eberly wrote:
<quoted text>
The only things you give birth to via anal sodomy and analingus is another queer and multi-drug resistant disease.
It is inherent to queers and a lower animals to invert the priorities of sex. The queer believes pleasure and convenience have higher priority over reproduction, and act accordingly.
Queers behave like lower animals, but demand to be respected as humans with special rights?
Lower animals don't have sex for pleasure. If I recall correctly, dolphins and monkeys are the only other animals that engage in recreational sex.

Sex is for pleasure, otherwise infertile couples, couples using birth control and elderly couples would never have it.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7900
Mar 19, 2013
 
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
1.) I'm only 7 feet when I'm wearing hooker heels.(grin)
2.) My master's degree and over 25 years experience says that I am a social worker.
3.) Yes, in fact I do require your words to reflect science. If you are going to get on here and insist that you have a firm grasp of a specific theory, then I am going to insist that you not butcher that theory by creating terms that simply do not exist.
4.) I do not slander you. I don't know you. Your name has never been uttered from my lips here on this site. In order for me to have slandered you, I would have had to have said "__" was chased away by his congregation." Maybe others have said this, but I haven't. You would also have to prove that such statements have resulted in significant damage. Shall we add "lack of knowledge about the law" to the list of other things you know very little about?
You lie again. You weren't requiring that my words reflect science (they do, and that is why you diverge to lies), you were demanding they quote exactly what a scientist says.

There is absolutely nothing untrue or unscientific about these statements;

At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.

ss couples are a direct defective contradiction to the primary goal evolution.

Or this statement;

Epigenetics has preliminary proof that homosexuality is caused by epi-markers being left on the DNA of the parent of a opposite sex child.

All you need to do is post a quote from a scientific source that contradicts those facts.

You can't, so you don't.

By the way, I'm not accusing you of slander in the legal sense, just reality.

Smirk.
lifes a beach

Lebanon, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7901
Mar 19, 2013
 
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Brandy, are you serious???
I 'force' children to discern the difference between their parents and ss couples???
No wonder you are having a hard time distinguishing between relationships.
Here are some differences that I have learned from being married 36 years and yes, from books. But mostly just common sense...
If you
believe denying marriage to a relationship
will prevent love
If you
demand any committed relationship
has to be called marriage
If you
claim rights and benefits can only be acquired
by an imposition on marriage
If you
equate the diversity of two genders
with the redundancy of same genders
If you
desecrate the sacred tradition of all major religions
and violate the historic practice of every single culture in history
If you
believe a fundamental change to the building block of society
will have absolutely no affect
If you
think a law can change
the reality of crucial distinctions in relationships
If you
pretend duplicating sexuality
is the same as blending masculinity and femininity
If you
condemn some children to parents of only one gender
and deliberately deny some children one natural parent
If you
ignore the design of sexual union
to manipulate a harmful act
If you
violate evolution's law of reproduction
to equate a genetic dead end
If you
risk the healthiest human relationship
to include one of the unhealthiest
If you
parallel the sole birthplace of every other relationship
with one that can reproduce none
If you
dilute all these things
down to just 'a committed relationship of two people'
Then, and only then, can you equate same-sex unions with marriage.
Following that line of thinking especially the first two then there is really no reason for heterosexual couples to get married either.

How is same sex marriage characteristically any less healthy than heterosexual marriage? Dont worry, Ill wait...

Btw, marriage and reproduction has NOTHING to do with one another.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7902
Mar 19, 2013
 
John Eberly wrote:
<quoted text>
It's in the news.
Homosexual male priests sodomized a lot of boys.
Bi-sexual Jerry Sandusky sodomized a lot of boys.
Male Boy Scout leaders sodomized a lot of boys.
Sodomy is a habitual homosexual proclivity, and it is disgusting.
Anal sodomy is typical of male homosexuals.
Why do people like you refer to anal and oral and analingus sodomy as sex?
The only thing you give birth to via sodomy is HIV and AIDS and other STD and disease.
Here is a dirty little gay secret;

Homosexuals want us to believe that ALL the priests who molested just boys were ONLY pedophiles, and not gay pedophiles, or gays who took advantage of their trusted sacred position to abuse the young and helpless.

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiggggggggghhhht ...

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7903
Mar 19, 2013
 
lifes a beach wrote:
<quoted text>
Lower animals don't have sex for pleasure. If I recall correctly, dolphins and monkeys are the only other animals that engage in recreational sex.
Sex is for pleasure, otherwise infertile couples, couples using birth control and elderly couples would never have it.
So a dog humping a leg is doing it to reproduce?

Smirk.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7904
Mar 19, 2013
 
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Just wondering... How do you feel about heterosexual couples who enjoy anal sex? Are they "queer" too?
Are there other "queer" behaviors that heterosexuals engage in besides abortion--maybe sex before marriage, divorce, eating pork?
Anal sex is inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning.

Why would anyone do that or allow it to be done?

Especially in a supposedly loving relationship???

Sick.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7905
Mar 19, 2013
 
lifes a beach wrote:
<quoted text>
Following that line of thinking especially the first two then there is really no reason for heterosexual couples to get married either.
How is same sex marriage characteristically any less healthy than heterosexual marriage? Dont worry, Ill wait...
Btw, marriage and reproduction has NOTHING to do with one another.
Honey, I don't think you think.

How can you understand what someone else is saying when you can't understand what you are saying?

-How does what I wrote specifically disqualify marriage? I can't wait to hear your answer...

-I wouldn't want to be rude and keep you waiting, The Huffington Post had a recent article, but here is another one;

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-135...
Marriage-key-better-life-Study -finds-tying-knot-means-improv ed-health-longer-life-expectan cy.html

-At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior. SCOTUS has noted that distinction and it's importance to our culture numerous times.

Here is an analogy to help you understand;

The differences between marriage with/without kids and gay couples;
An apple tree bearing fruit.
An apple tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
An walnut tree who never bears any fruit wanting to be a apple tree.
An walnut tree hanging apples on it's branches pretending to be a apple tree.

Even funnier?

The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' apple trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call walnut trees apple trees too!

Smile.
come on now

Bolingbrook, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7906
Mar 19, 2013
 
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
So a dog humping a leg is doing it to reproduce?
Smirk.
Finally you got something right....
Why Do Dogs Hump?

Humping, or mounting, is a sexual position for dogs, but veterinarians who specialize in canine behavior say it often is done for other reasons as well.

David S. Spiegel, VMD, who has a behavioral veterinary practice near Swarthmore, Pa., says in unneutered and unspayed dogs under a year old, humping is usually sexual in nature. But in older dogs it can be a sign of dominance, a reaction to something that has excited the dog, like visitors arriving, or a sign that a dog hasnt been socialized correctly and doesnt know appropriate canine behavior.

The topic draws giggles and laughs, but its a very real topic for some people, Spiegel says.Some dogs can become very compulsive about the behavior.

Gary Landsberg, DVM, a veterinary behaviorist in Ontario, Canada, says mounting is common play behavior in puppies, and is even normal in the play of older dogs if its not taken to extremes.Youll often see one dog mount another, then a few minutes later theyll switch off and the other dog will mount the first dog, Landsberg says.Its a common play gesture.

Its done by males and females, even by dogs that have been neutered or spayed, he says.Its a play behavior that dogs do because no one has told them its not acceptable, Landsberg said.It can become enjoyable or a normal part of the dogs day, so it keeps doing it. Its the same as jumping up or barking at the door.
http://pets.webmd.com/dogs/features/humping-w...

See nothing to do w sex

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7907
Mar 19, 2013
 
come on now wrote:
<quoted text>
Finally you got something right....
Why Do Dogs Hump?
Humping, or mounting, is a sexual position for dogs, but veterinarians who specialize in canine behavior say it often is done for other reasons as well.
David S. Spiegel, VMD, who has a behavioral veterinary practice near Swarthmore, Pa., says in unneutered and unspayed dogs under a year old, humping is usually sexual in nature. But in older dogs it can be a sign of dominance, a reaction to something that has excited the dog, like visitors arriving, or a sign that a dog hasnt been socialized correctly and doesnt know appropriate canine behavior.
The topic draws giggles and laughs, but its a very real topic for some people, Spiegel says.Some dogs can become very compulsive about the behavior.
Gary Landsberg, DVM, a veterinary behaviorist in Ontario, Canada, says mounting is common play behavior in puppies, and is even normal in the play of older dogs if its not taken to extremes.Youll often see one dog mount another, then a few minutes later theyll switch off and the other dog will mount the first dog, Landsberg says.Its a common play gesture.
Its done by males and females, even by dogs that have been neutered or spayed, he says.Its a play behavior that dogs do because no one has told them its not acceptable, Landsberg said.It can become enjoyable or a normal part of the dogs day, so it keeps doing it. Its the same as jumping up or barking at the door.
http://pets.webmd.com/dogs/features/humping-w...
See nothing to do w sex
Are you a sister of 'life's a beach'?

Smile.
John Eberly

Dayton, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7908
Mar 19, 2013
 
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Just wondering... How do you feel about heterosexual couples who enjoy anal sex? Are they "queer" too?
Are there other "queer" behaviors that heterosexuals engage in besides abortion--maybe sex before marriage, divorce, eating pork?
As I've stated a zillion times, but it never sticks to queer brains, queer is as queer does does.

Queer behaviors essentially include sodomy and abortion.

All queers believe abortion and sodomy are virtues.

This isn't complicated but the queer brain can't comprehend logic.

It's sad that I've got to use Dr. Suess language to explain this idea....

Queer love sodomy
Queer love abortion
Queer love doing sodomy and abortion
Queer do sodomy with man, woman, child, beast, or machine.
Queer do elective abortion many times.
Queer think sodomy and abortion human virtues

Straight don't like sodomy
Straight don't like abortion
Straight don't do sodomy or abortion
Straight don't do sodomy with man, woman, beast, or machine.
Straight don't do elective abortion.
Straight think sodomy and abortion beast behavior

As a side note, why can't queers say anal sodomy? Are you afraid that people might research the definition of sodomy and discover that sodomy isn't sex?

Playing your word games, I could re-label anal sodomy as monkey love, but I would be insulting monkeys unnecessarily.
lifes a beach

Lebanon, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7909
Mar 19, 2013
 
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Honey, I don't think you think.
How can you understand what someone else is saying when you can't understand what you are saying?
-How does what I wrote specifically disqualify marriage? I can't wait to hear your answer...
-I wouldn't want to be rude and keep you waiting, The Huffington Post had a recent article, but here is another one;
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-135...
Marriage-key-better-life-Study -finds-tying-knot-means-improv ed-health-longer-life-expectan cy.html
-At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior. SCOTUS has noted that distinction and it's importance to our culture numerous times.
Here is an analogy to help you understand;
The differences between marriage with/without kids and gay couples;
An apple tree bearing fruit.
An apple tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
An walnut tree who never bears any fruit wanting to be a apple tree.
An walnut tree hanging apples on it's branches pretending to be a apple tree.
Even funnier?
The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' apple trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call walnut trees apple trees too!
Smile.
No marriage has nothing to do with procreation and vice versa. You can procreate without marriage and get married and never procreate.

Apple tree not bearing fruit= no fruit
Plum tree not bearing fruit= no fruit

The outcome is still the same, which is no progeny. Secondly, some same sex couples do have and adopt children so again your analogy is flawed.

Speaking of fruit and nut trees, you seem to not have fallen far from one of them yourself, eh?

Walnut trees and Apple trees are still trees, simple as that.
lifes a beach

Lebanon, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7910
Mar 19, 2013
 
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
So a dog humping a leg is doing it to reproduce?
Smirk.
Even a dog who has been neutered can do that and its according to veterinarians a form of playful behavior. Smirk.

http://pets.webmd.com/dogs/features/humping-w...
lifes a beach

Lebanon, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7911
Mar 19, 2013
 
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Honey, I don't think you think.
How can you understand what someone else is saying when you can't understand what you are saying?
-How does what I wrote specifically disqualify marriage? I can't wait to hear your answer...
-I wouldn't want to be rude and keep you waiting, The Huffington Post had a recent article, but here is another one;
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-135...
Marriage-key-better-life-Study -finds-tying-knot-means-improv ed-health-longer-life-expectan cy.html
-At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior. SCOTUS has noted that distinction and it's importance to our culture numerous times.
Here is an analogy to help you understand;
The differences between marriage with/without kids and gay couples;
An apple tree bearing fruit.
An apple tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
An walnut tree who never bears any fruit wanting to be a apple tree.
An walnut tree hanging apples on it's branches pretending to be a apple tree.
Even funnier?
The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' apple trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call walnut trees apple trees too!
Smile.
If heterosexual marriage is so important then why is there such a high divorce rate? Well? Still waiting...
John Eberly

Dayton, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7912
Mar 19, 2013
 
lifes a beach wrote:
<quoted text>
If heterosexual marriage is so important then why is there such a high divorce rate? Well? Still waiting...
Queers degraded all of the local government pre-conditions for a marriage license.

Queers used shyster lawyer methods to eliminate all legal grounds for denying a couple a marriage license.

Before queers stuck their nose in other peoples business, many local governments could disqualify for licensing any persons that had any of these ethical failings.

sodomy conviction
elective abortion
STD
obscenity conviction
child endangerment
prostitution
poverty
mental deficiency
John Eberly

Dayton, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7913
Mar 19, 2013
 
lifes a beach wrote:
<quoted text>
No marriage has nothing to do with procreation and vice versa. You can procreate without marriage and get married and never procreate.
Apple tree not bearing fruit= no fruit
Plum tree not bearing fruit= no fruit
The outcome is still the same, which is no progeny. Secondly, some same sex couples do have and adopt children so again your analogy is flawed.
Speaking of fruit and nut trees, you seem to not have fallen far from one of them yourself, eh?
Walnut trees and Apple trees are still trees, simple as that.
Just because you can procreate and sling animal dung like a monkey doesn't mean you are deserving of a marriage license.

Stupid and evil people have kids too, as you well know.

Public child services exist because stupid and evil people breed like rats.

The opposite of a marriage license would be separation order. It would be a good idea to give out more separation orders to stupid and evil people, so that they cannot reproduce, connive, or spread disease.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7914
Mar 19, 2013
 
lifes a beach wrote:
<quoted text>
No marriage has nothing to do with procreation and vice versa. You can procreate without marriage and get married and never procreate.
Apple tree not bearing fruit= no fruit
Plum tree not bearing fruit= no fruit
The outcome is still the same, which is no progeny. Secondly, some same sex couples do have and adopt children so again your analogy is flawed.
Speaking of fruit and nut trees, you seem to not have fallen far from one of them yourself, eh?
Walnut trees and Apple trees are still trees, simple as that.
You are blonde, aren't you.

ss couples have nothing to do with procreation.

At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.

Look up mating behavior, and then answer this question;

Why does a butch lesbian dress and act like a man to attract another lesbian?

The analogy is mine, so you cannot add plum trees.

Did you really say gay couples can procreate? Are you sure a debate site is the best playground for you? Maybe you should stick with the beach...

More specifically, apple and walnut trees are both FRUIT trees. Hence, in the analogy, apples trees are married couples and barren walnut trees are ss couples. You are trying to equate a barren walnut tree with a apple tree in calling ss couples 'married'. Reality calls you a stupid liar.

Sorry.

Smile.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Greeneville Jobs

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]