Gay Marriage Debate - Everett, WA

Discuss the national Gay Marriage debate in Everett, WA.

Do you support gay marriage?

Everett opposes
Oppose
 
85
Support
 
77

Vote now in Everett:

Comments
181 - 200 of 200 Comments Last updated -
First Prev
of 10
Next Last
Lalala

Las Vegas, NV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184
Nov 1, 2012
 
The_Box wrote:
<quoted text>
There are plenty of easy lines to draw.
Over age 50? You're out.
Post-menopause? You're out.
Had a historectomy or vasectomy? You're out.
Haven't had a kid within 2 years of being married: your lose your marriage benefits.
Not easy lines who is gonna keep track of this information and pay the cost to track this information. YOU...
The_Box wrote:
<quoted text>
Stop pretending like you hold your position because of "future tax payers". No one is buying it.
So you control everyones opinions, Ha Ha Ha.... Where would we without future Tax Payers?

Marriage is between a man and a woman.
Lalala

Las Vegas, NV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#185
Nov 1, 2012
 
Ooogah Boogah wrote:
<quoted text>
Heterosexuals eating undercooked monkey brains is far less outlandish, than "Homosexuals" having sex with monkeys (in which case it would be beastiality not homosexuality). Stupid!
I did not known homosexuals have sex with monkeys. How disgusting.
Lalala

Las Vegas, NV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#186
Nov 1, 2012
 
come on now wrote:
<quoted text>
"Why do warp it by saying elderly straight couples. I see because homsexuality is warped."
No because your origional premis was warped. You stated straight couples well elderly straight couples meet your criteria... but they will have no more children (on their own) than a ssc will. So your premis is moot.... go figure.
It would be only be valid if you used elderly in both groups. We are not talking old vs young. We are talking homo vs hetero. Even then an elderly man and a young woman can reproduce, but elderly man and a young man can not reproduce.

Marriage is between a man and a woman

Marriage is between a man and a woman
Lalala

Las Vegas, NV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#187
Nov 1, 2012
 
come on now wrote:
<quoted text>
Great and since ssc have had , have and will continue to have children which meets your above statement... one more reason for ssm.
Marriage is a legal contract... no gender in contracts... party a party b
So to make it all equal as GLBT calls it Marriage equality why are they not including:
Brother to Brother marriage
Sister to Sister Marriage
Brother to Sister Marriage
Or even marriages of more then 2 persons.
Father to Son Marriage
etc...

NOPE the GLBT just wants Homosexuality accepted as normal. SSM is nothing then a stamp of approval to homosexuals, why do you think thay are not satisfied with civil unions.

Marriage is between a man and a woman.
Lalala

Las Vegas, NV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#188
Nov 1, 2012
 
come on now wrote:
<quoted text>
'So the birth rate of the homosexual couples will be as high as for the heterosexual couplers, don't think so."
Gee never said that did I . I simply pointed out that they do have children so your origional statement is as false as your marriage is between a man and women statement.
And just how do two people of the same gender have there own biological child?
no big O

Bolingbrook, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#189
Nov 1, 2012
 
Lalala wrote:
<quoted text>
Not easy lines who is gonna keep track of this information and pay the cost to track this information. YOU...
<quoted text>
So you control everyones opinions, Ha Ha Ha.... Where would we without future Tax Payers?
Marriage is between a man and a woman.
"Not easy lines who is gonna keep track of this information and pay the cost to track this information. YOU..."

Since the 14th amendment basically says that you can not have one law for one set of citizens and another for another... cost is irrelevant. If you keep ssc from marrying because they can not procreate, you under the 14th can not allow anyone to marry who can not procreate.....

"So you control everyones opinions, Ha Ha Ha.... Where would we without future Tax Payers?"

You do realize that the homosexual population is less than 5% so even IF each and ever one of those 5% got married and did not have "future tax payers" (and with various methods available some of them would) the other 95% of u.s. citizens would be more than able to replenish the tax paying citizenry......
no big O

Bolingbrook, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#190
Nov 1, 2012
 
Lalala wrote:
<quoted text>
It would be only be valid if you used elderly in both groups. We are not talking old vs young. We are talking homo vs hetero. Even then an elderly man and a young woman can reproduce, but elderly man and a young man can not reproduce.
Marriage is between a man and a woman
Marriage is between a man and a woman
"It would be only be valid if you used elderly in both groups. We are not talking old vs young. We are talking homo vs hetero. Even then an elderly man and a young woman can reproduce, but elderly man and a young man can not reproduce."

Spin denied. We going by your "logic" were talking apples to apples. Elderly couple (not old man young f as that wold not be elderly coulple) but old man post menopausal women vs ssc. Neither one could have children therefore under your "logic" neither one should be allowed to marry.

Marrige is not about procreation.
Marriage is a legal contract between two people...
no big O

Bolingbrook, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#191
Nov 1, 2012
 
Lalala wrote:
<quoted text>
And just how do two people of the same gender have there own biological child?
Once again spin denied. Never said that their children wold be their own biological children... But their children just the same. Now are you going to tell an osc that their adopted child is not "their child" because it is not biological?... What about the family who had to use a sperm or egg doner.... you gonna restrict them because the child is not their "biological" child?....

“There is no Truth in Faith”

Since: Dec 08

nowhere near a pound of $100's

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#192
Nov 2, 2012
 
Lalala wrote:
<quoted text>
It would be only be valid if you used elderly in both groups. We are not talking old vs young. We are talking homo vs hetero. Even then an elderly man and a young woman can reproduce, but elderly man and a young man can not reproduce.
Marriage is between a man and a woman
Marriage is between a man and a woman
Apparently STUPID people like yourself benefit from repetition, plus it would do you no good to successfully evade the question, so ONCE AGAIN (making three times):

It turns out, the sequencing of hormones in the mother's womb is what determines whether a person's physical body and/or brain structure is male or female. It is an established fact that some physical females have XY chromosomes and some physical males have XX chromosomes.

So, now what? Are physical males with XX chromosomes actually male or female? Who should they be marrying?

It seems either way you choose, you now have a connundrum; If you say physical males should only marry physical females, then you'll have pairings that amount to genetic females marrying genetic females. If you say genetic males should only marry genetic females, then you have what looks like on the surface to be a lesbian marriage.

Either way, they don't have a choice about who they are. Are you going to exclude them from marrying anyone and why should you have that right? Just because you are stupid? I don't think that should give you extraordinary rights.

“There is no Truth in Faith”

Since: Dec 08

nowhere near a pound of $100's

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193
Nov 2, 2012
 
no big O wrote:
<quoted text>
"It would be only be valid if you used elderly in both groups. We are not talking old vs young. We are talking homo vs hetero. Even then an elderly man and a young woman can reproduce, but elderly man and a young man can not reproduce."
Spin denied. We going by your "logic" were talking apples to apples. Elderly couple (not old man young f as that wold not be elderly coulple) but old man post menopausal women vs ssc. Neither one could have children therefore under your "logic" neither one should be allowed to marry.
Marrige is not about procreation.
Marriage is a legal contract between two people...
So then, according to you, these people should not be allowed to marry; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Androgen_insensi...
Lalala

Las Vegas, NV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#194
Nov 5, 2012
 
no big O wrote:
<quoted text>
Since the 14th amendment basically says that you can not have one law for one set of citizens and another for another... cost is irrelevant. If you keep ssc from marrying because they can not procreate, you under the 14th can not allow anyone to marry who can not procreate.....
So according to the 14th amendment it is equal for all sets of citizens, anyone can marry someone of the opposing gender.

Marriage is between a man and a woman.
no big O wrote:
<quoted text>
You do realize that the homosexual population is less than 5% so even IF each and ever one of those 5% got married and did not have "future tax payers" (and with various methods available some of them would) the other 95% of u.s. citizens would be more than able to replenish the tax paying citizenry......
So I hope you don't invest. Adding 5% of junk stock (SSM) would certainly reduce future returns (reproduction).
Lalala

Las Vegas, NV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#195
Nov 5, 2012
 
no big O wrote:
<quoted text>
Marriage is a legal contract between two people...
Then why is being called marriage equality when it does not allow related persons to marry. You know brother to sister, sister to sister, brother to brother, Mom to son, dad to son, etc...

Marriage is between a man and a woman.
Lalala

Las Vegas, NV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#196
Nov 5, 2012
 
Ooogah Boogah wrote:
<quoted text>
Apparently STUPID people like yourself benefit from repetition, plus it would do you no good to successfully evade the question, so ONCE AGAIN (making three times):
It turns out, the sequencing of hormones in the mother's womb is what determines whether a person's physical body and/or brain structure is male or female. It is an established fact that some physical females have XY chromosomes and some physical males have XX chromosomes.
So, now what? Are physical males with XX chromosomes actually male or female? Who should they be marrying?
It seems either way you choose, you now have a connundrum; If you say physical males should only marry physical females, then you'll have pairings that amount to genetic females marrying genetic females. If you say genetic males should only marry genetic females, then you have what looks like on the surface to be a lesbian marriage.
Either way, they don't have a choice about who they are. Are you going to exclude them from marrying anyone and why should you have that right? Just because you are stupid? I don't think that should give you extraordinary rights.
So homosexuals are born mentally deformed. 5% seems about the rate of other deformities also.

“There is no Truth in Faith”

Since: Dec 08

nowhere near a pound of $100's

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#197
Nov 5, 2012
 
Lalala wrote:
<quoted text>
So homosexuals are born mentally deformed. 5% seems about the rate of other deformities also.
If you say so ... but apparently you are saying that people deformed (the way your god intended) should not be allowed to marry the people your god made them desire.
no big O

Bolingbrook, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#198
Nov 5, 2012
 
Lalala wrote:
<quoted text>
So homosexuals are born mentally deformed. 5% seems about the rate of other deformities also.
You would think with all the advanced medical knowledge that we have... there would be a medical diagnosis of this "deformaty"... there is for ALL other deformities that children are born with.... They can trace most back to something... gene, what the mother may or may not have done during the pregancy.... yet there has yet to be a study to back you comment up/.
alice

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#199
Nov 5, 2012
 
no big O wrote:
<quoted text>
You would think with all the advanced medical knowledge that we have... there would be a medical diagnosis of this "deformaty"... there is for ALL other deformities that children are born with.... They can trace most back to something... gene, what the mother may or may not have done during the pregancy.... yet there has yet to be a study to back you comment up/.
The same"ADVANCED MEDICAL KNOWLEDE"that cant even CURE the COMMON cold?
Catherine

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#200
Nov 9, 2012
 
It's about equality!

“There is no Truth in Faith”

Since: Dec 08

nowhere near a pound of $100's

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#201
Nov 9, 2012
 
alice wrote:
<quoted text>The same"ADVANCED MEDICAL KNOWLEDE"that cant even CURE the COMMON cold?
Well, it CAN cure leprosy, which is a darned site more effective than Leviticus 14
Michael

Everett, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#203
Apr 28, 2013
 
all people deserve happiness. whether that means being with the one you choose to spend your life with or to life alone... personal choice. and NOBODY should be the end all desition maker for EVERYONE.
G Marquis Ouattara

Everett, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#204
Feb 16, 2014
 
I believe all adults should be able to express their love in the most respectable way possible which is by marrying the person you fall in love with. This single act demonstrates respect, unity, oneness, and shows everyone that you are a legitimate.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

First Prev
of 10
Next Last
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Everett Discussions

Search the Everett Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
WA Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Washingto... (Oct '10) 11 hr Mr Blue 714
Robin Williams suicide was 'selfish,' says Todd... Aug 15 Big mike 15
Boyfriend Who Smothered Child Gets Prison (Nov '07) Aug 12 I am still here 27
celebrate recovery (Jan '12) Aug 9 John 30
Hitler poster provokes Edmonds incident (Sep '09) Aug 2 Elise Renee Ginge... 4
Snohomish boy beaten for poor report card (Jun '08) Aug 1 Ooogah Boogah 11
How to navigate a roundabout Snohomish's rounda... Jul 23 ScottRAB 1

Everett Jobs

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]