Gay Marriage Debate - Everett, WA

Discuss the national Gay Marriage debate in Everett, WA.

Do you support gay marriage?

Everett opposes
Oppose
 
85
Support
 
77

Vote now in Everett:

Comments

Showing posts 1 - 20 of200
< prev page
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
J C rules

Qualicum Beach, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Jul 27, 2010
 
homosexual behavior is perverse degenerate unnatural,ungodly, and a blight on civilization.No civilized society can survive a state condoning this type of behavior .
the real JC

Bellingham, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Aug 11, 2010
 
equality, compassion and truth

“There is no Truth in Faith”

Since: Dec 08

nowhere near a pound of $100's

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Aug 15, 2010
 
J C rules wrote:
homosexual behavior is perverse degenerate unnatural,ungodly, and a blight on civilization.No civilized society can survive a state condoning this type of behavior .
And why would that be? Would you be having so much homosexual sex you could no longer reproduce??
Lalala

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Aug 17, 2010
 
Ooogah Boogah wrote:
<quoted text>
And why would that be? Would you be having so much homosexual sex you could no longer reproduce??
I see you are here attacking and making assuptions about others life styles too. Geez try telling us what benefit Gay marriages would have for the good of the American Society.

All I have seen is a lot wasted tax payer money, New STDs come about, the selfishness of not supporting the future of their own society or their own family heritage.

To me Marriage is between to persons of the opposite sex to raise a family.

“There is no Truth in Faith”

Since: Dec 08

nowhere near a pound of $100's

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Aug 17, 2010
 
Lalala wrote:
<quoted text>
I see you are here attacking and making assuptions about others life styles too. Geez try telling us what benefit Gay marriages would have for the good of the American Society.
All I have seen is a lot wasted tax payer money, New STDs come about, the selfishness of not supporting the future of their own society or their own family heritage.
To me Marriage is between to persons of the opposite sex to raise a family.
A loving family is a loving family, no matter the sexual orientation. With homosexuals in the society, there are more loving families to raise children. THAT is how homosexuals benefit society even from your gonad oriented point of view.

A disease is a disease no matter who or which sector of society it attacks. Should we abandon treatment for breast cancer because it only affects a certain portion of society that chooses to be female <sarcasm>.

You have yet to answer my question as to how a society of 300,000,000 heterosexual couples would thrive until you sprinkle in an additional 150,000,000 homosexuals and now those same 300,000,000 couples can not produce fast enough to keep the society from collapsing??

What kind of stupid gonad oriented math is that and why does it work that way, if it works at all?

Dumbazz!!
Lalala

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Aug 19, 2010
 
Ooogah Boogah wrote:
<quoted text>
A loving family is a loving family, no matter the sexual orientation. With homosexuals in the society, there are more loving families to raise children. THAT is how homosexuals benefit society even from your gonad oriented point of view.
A disease is a disease no matter who or which sector of society it attacks. Should we abandon treatment for breast cancer because it only affects a certain portion of society that chooses to be female <sarcasm>.
You have yet to answer my question as to how a society of 300,000,000 heterosexual couples would thrive until you sprinkle in an additional 150,000,000 homosexuals and now those same 300,000,000 couples can not produce fast enough to keep the society from collapsing??
What kind of stupid gonad oriented math is that and why does it work that way, if it works at all?
Dumbazz!!
Each person needs to make its replacement in a society, if everyone does not have a replacement or the society gets smaller.
The degree it shrinks is called a reproduction rate. Since 1992 the reproduction rate has been 1.4 per couple. Homosexuals do not create new life.

The only benefit you can come up with is they can be part of a loving family, thats because they can produce their own family.

You say a disease is a disease, how Ironic, of course it is. Well when Homosexuals started coming out in this society, seems to be when AIDS surfaced then hit epidemic proportions.

Is there any other way Gay Marriage would benefit the longevity of the American society? Besides they can be loving people, anyone can be loving.
Lalala

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Aug 19, 2010
 
Ahh! I think I get it, are you Ooogah Boogah trying to say Homosexuals can not be loving people with out a marriage certificate. LOL

“There is no Truth in Faith”

Since: Dec 08

nowhere near a pound of $100's

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
Aug 19, 2010
 
Lalala wrote:
Ahh! I think I get it, are you Ooogah Boogah trying to say Homosexuals can not be loving people with out a marriage certificate. LOL
No, I am saying that since they can be a loving family, they should be entitled to all the rights and privileges any other loving family is regardless what bigots like yourself have to say.

“There is no Truth in Faith”

Since: Dec 08

nowhere near a pound of $100's

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
Aug 19, 2010
 
Lalala wrote:
<quoted text>
Each person needs to make its replacement in a society, if everyone does not have a replacement or the society gets smaller.
The degree it shrinks is called a reproduction rate. Since 1992 the reproduction rate has been 1.4 per couple. Homosexuals do not create new life.
The only benefit you can come up with is they can be part of a loving family, thats because they can produce their own family.
You say a disease is a disease, how Ironic, of course it is. Well when Homosexuals started coming out in this society, seems to be when AIDS surfaced then hit epidemic proportions.
Is there any other way Gay Marriage would benefit the longevity of the American society? Besides they can be loving people, anyone can be loving.
And you still avoided my question although you did have to babble like a nitwit to do it.

For a fourth time, dimbulb;

If 300,000,000 heterosexual pairs can make a thriving society that will endure with NO homosexuals, WHY when you add 150,000,000 homosexual couples, does the SAME society of 300,000,000 heterosexual pairs suddenly loose the ability to thrive and collapses in on itself???

Hmmmmm?!?!? Now try to actually answer that question without looking like the idiot you are this time.

“There is no Truth in Faith”

Since: Dec 08

nowhere near a pound of $100's

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
Aug 19, 2010
 
Lalala wrote:
....
You say a disease is a disease, how Ironic, of course it is. Well when Homosexuals started coming out in this society, seems to be when AIDS surfaced then hit epidemic proportions.
........
So now you are saying AIDS did not exist before homosexuals started coming out???

Geeze!!! That is an incredibly stupid concept!!

When you get a brain, try to understand that homosexuals that hadn't come out yet, were still homosexuals and the AIDs virus existed before we knew how to identify it.

BTW, AIDS is transmitted by heterosexual contact and blood transfusions. Try to remember that when you get in an accident or your hubby returns from that long hike on the Appalachian trail.

“There is no Truth in Faith”

Since: Dec 08

nowhere near a pound of $100's

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11
Aug 19, 2010
 
Lalala wrote:
..........
Is there any other way Gay Marriage would benefit the longevity of the American society? Besides they can be loving people, anyone can be loving.
So now you are saying that the only way that people contribute to a society is via their gonads??

Well, in your case, I can see how that might be true. But for the rest of the human race it isn't.
Lalala

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12
Aug 20, 2010
 
Ooogah Boogah wrote:
<quoted text>
No, I am saying that since they can be a loving family, they should be entitled to all the rights and privileges any other loving family is regardless what bigots like yourself have to say.
They should have all benefits, of people that go through pregnancy, childbirth, and raising a child. When they choose to be in life style that this is not possible. Pardon me they can raise a child after someone else has gone through the pregnancy and childbirth.
Lalala

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#13
Aug 20, 2010
 
Ooogah Boogah wrote:
<quoted text>
So now you are saying AIDS did not exist before homosexuals started coming out???
Geeze!!! That is an incredibly stupid concept!!
When you get a brain, try to understand that homosexuals that hadn't come out yet, were still homosexuals and the AIDs virus existed before we knew how to identify it.
BTW, AIDS is transmitted by heterosexual contact and blood transfusions. Try to remember that when you get in an accident or your hubby returns from that long hike on the Appalachian trail.
Was it now, then why was it the vast majority of cases were among the Homosexual community. Yes some into bisexual fetishes, passed it to the hetrosexual community.

I am sure AIDS was there before, but it was not an epedemic until the homosexual community came out of the closet.
Lalala

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#14
Aug 20, 2010
 
Ooogah Boogah wrote:
<quoted text>
So now you are saying that the only way that people contribute to a society is via their gonads??
Well, in your case, I can see how that might be true. But for the rest of the human race it isn't.
You are the one that keeps mentioning Gonads.

I simply said that do not contribute to the longevity of the society through there lack of reproduction.

I never that is the only way to contribute to a society, oh spokes person for the rest of the human race now, congrats on the promotion.

“There is no Truth in Faith”

Since: Dec 08

nowhere near a pound of $100's

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#15
Aug 20, 2010
 
Lalala wrote:
<quoted text>
You are the one that keeps mentioning Gonads.
I simply said that do not contribute to the longevity of the society through there lack of reproduction.
I never that is the only way to contribute to a society, oh spokes person for the rest of the human race now, congrats on the promotion.
You are the one who says the only way a Married couple contributes to society is via reproduction = gonads....

This is your stupid idea, not mine.

“There is no Truth in Faith”

Since: Dec 08

nowhere near a pound of $100's

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#16
Aug 20, 2010
 
Lalala wrote:
<quoted text>
Was it now, then why was it the vast majority of cases were among the Homosexual community. Yes some into bisexual fetishes, passed it to the hetrosexual community.
I am sure AIDS was there before, but it was not an epedemic until the homosexual community came out of the closet.
As a heterosexual, I know for a fact I could no more choose to be a homosexual than I could choose to be a female.

So, according to your line of thinking, we should blame all people who choose to be female for breast cancer because they chose to be female. Do you see how stupid that is yet?

So if being "in the closet" keeps AIDS from spreading, why don't you alert the medical community? I'm sure they would love to know.

Dumbazz!!

“There is no Truth in Faith”

Since: Dec 08

nowhere near a pound of $100's

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17
Aug 20, 2010
 
Lalala wrote:
<quoted text>
They should have all benefits, of people that go through pregnancy, childbirth, and raising a child. When they choose to be in life style that this is not possible. Pardon me they can raise a child after someone else has gone through the pregnancy and childbirth.
So you ARE saying the only way a married couple contribute to society is via their gonads. I thought so, I just wanted to be sure you were really that stupid.

Besides being capable of being a loving person, what other benefit to the American society would there be to allow Elderly Marriage?

Besides being capable of being a loving person, what other benefit to the American society would there be to allow Infertile Couple Marriage?

Besides being capable of being a loving person, what other benefit to the American society would there be to allow Ambiguous Gender Marriage?(Yes, it happens, a lot more often than you know)

Are you saying that these people should not be allowed to marry either because their gonads don't necessarily produce offspring??

Perhaps we should require fertility testing before we allow marriage according to your thinking. Until we do, forbidding homosexual marriage is a bigoted and hypocritical position.

Homosexuals, Elderly, Infertiles, and Ambiguous genders have existed all throughout human history. It is not a new thing. If they were going to cause the collapse of human civilization, it would have happened long before the planets population reached 5,000,000,000 people.

Clearly, you are as nutty as a squirrel turd.
Lalala

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#18
Aug 20, 2010
 
Ooogah Boogah wrote:
<quoted text>
You are the one who says the only way a Married couple contributes to society is via reproduction = gonads....
This is your stupid idea, not mine.
You are just twisting words. I only ever said that a homosexual couple can not have Children. And Yes NEWS FLASH!!! a Hetrosexual couple can have Children.

Get those Gonads of your chin and you might be able to read what is there. LOL
Lalala

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19
Aug 20, 2010
 
Ooogah Boogah wrote:
<quoted text>
So you ARE saying the only way a married couple contribute to society is via their gonads. I thought so, I just wanted to be sure you were really that stupid.
In a perfect society everyone contributes to society while they are alive. Homsexuals leave nothing to keep the society going after they are gone because they choose not to.

Thanks for all the insults and speaking your devotion to gonads.
Lalala

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20
Aug 20, 2010
 
Ooogah Boogah, I apologize for my insults directed at you. "Your nutty as a squirrel turd" is actually funny. LOL.

That still does change the fact that Homosexual marriages can not produce children for future generations of their family or in the society they are a part of.

Also it takes more then just gonads to make children. Yes they are part of the process but there is also the females role in it also, which is actually the bigger more important part as far as I am concerned.

I won't be posting here anymore, I will stay on the other forum about this. Have A Great Day.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 1 - 20 of200
< prev page
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Everett Discussions

Search the Everett Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Woman in deadly white supremacist crime spree p... Apr 14 JOHN WHITE 4
Seeking Foreign Brides (Nov '06) Apr 14 Go Blue Forever 49
brown Apr 10 SleeplessInSeattle 2
M&M's Versus Eminem and Other Odd Amazon Sales ... Mar '14 Stan 1
Community roundup Mar '14 Stan 1
Amazon Holiday Fun Facts 2013 Mar '14 Stan 1
Weekends are for fun: Downton dining, Sausage F... Mar '14 Stan 1

Everett Jobs

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]