No just marriage now back to your "life partner".<quoted text>
And I was mounting a criticism of the argument that you were using on the subject of marriage. You should only use an argument of you agree with ALL of its implications otherwise it can be used against you when you disagree with it and you end up looking like a hypocritical douchbag for mounting the argument in the first place.
Your argument goes like this:
1. Action a is traditional
2. Any action which is traditional is acceptable
3. Ergo action a is acceptable
Your argument ONLY WORKS if you accept premise 3, otherwise it's a non-sequiter. Do you agree that anything that is traditional is acceptable? Or if something you thought was morally reprehensible was traditional would you not be convinced by your own argument?
Civil Unions Debate - New Lenox, IL
Discuss the national Civil Unions debate in New Lenox, IL.
Are Civil Unions Enough?
|Marriage is bet...||
|No, gay marriag...||
|Yes, that's plenty||
Comments (Page 2)
27 Users are viewing the New Lenox Forum right now
|“Saint” Mandela? Not So Fast!||3 min||Astronaut Yellowhammer||10|
|Best Christmas Trees- Spencer & Laraway||6 min||Horny Elf||11|
|Divorced For Obamacare||7 min||Astronaut Yellowhammer||4|
|IL Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10)||10 min||Religionthebiglie||39,672|
|Interesting 4th Branch Of Government in place now||20 min||Professor||6|
|Christmas Trees (spencer&laraway)||1 hr||Minooka Indians||13|
|What Are They?||1 hr||Professor||4|
|Will County workers on strike||4 hr||Well Now||351|