Casey Anthony Debate - Russell Springs, KY

[well]

kentucky girl wrote:

tell me then, of some cases "right here in KY" where someone was found guilty when you know for a fact that they were innocent....

well the ones that could tell you for a "fact" would be the one who did not do what he was charged with and the one who did do it. That is who knows for a fact. If you want proof that people here (other places too) would have found her guilty then your Proof is right here in all the posts about her. Go back like you would do if you were a juror, look at the evidence ( the posts), then after careful consideration, tell me what your verdict is. Would these people have found her guilty or Not guilty ? I rest my case. However, I can tell you that I know for a fact from years ago, that a lot of people in this town are corrupt. FACT not speculation. Things I have seen with my own eyes. Won't say what here. Let's just say I'm in the know. Don't care if you believe that or not. But it is the truth. I'm a pretty upstanding citizen but I know that even I could get railroaded like a lot of others have and like any other upstanding citizen. Know this. Perhaps you should ask yourself if someone accused you of some crime that you did not do, would you want them to base their decision on what they think of you or how they would react if they were you OR on the evidential Proof ? Pick one.

[well]

Stunned wrote:

i can NOT believe they found her NOT guilty.The way she acted when jury was out, waiting 31 days before telling she was missing ( then it was the Grandmother who called it in), partying, getting tattoos.Good thing I wasnt on the jury. Sad for Little Caylee. RIP.She may not get punished here on earth but her judgement day will come.

Please explain to me how partying, getting tattoo, acting how you wouldn't (or me), waiting, and a grandmother calling it in, Proves Guilt. Please explain. I'd like to hear it. I'm trying to explain something to someone and your explanation would help I'm sure. I know I wouldn't have acted the way she did.

[dealer]

maybe someone well take her out the same way

[pissed again]

Stunned wrote:

i can NOT believe they found her NOT guilty.The way she acted when jury was out, waiting 31 days before telling she was missing ( then it was the Grandmother who called it in), partying, getting tattoos.Good thing I wasnt on the jury. Sad for Little Caylee. RIP.She may not get punished here on earth but her judgement day will come.

i agree i am also stunned i think something was wrong with that jury ....but then again that is the so called system for ya

[your mom]

Redneck hater wrote:

Finally! 12 people had the good sense and the nerve to stand up to an almighty prosecutor and say "bull$hit". That would have never happened anywhere in Kentucky. I made the prediction that the state had not proved its case to me. This was yet another example of the state trying to tell 12 citizens, "she's guilty. Trust us. Convict her on just our word because we don't make mistakes." As I said, this would have never happened here.

Dear Dipstick,
That is what the prosecution is supposed to do. They do it in every case. Thank you in advance for trying to act more intelligent next time.
With love,
your mom

[Redneck hater]

What's up this morning all you Nancy Grace disciples? That croc-faced b*tch wasn't crowing too loud this morning on the news. Face it, bad mother or whatever, the state dropped the ball. The jury wouldn't buy it no matter how many pitiful pictures of Caylee was waved in front of them. Juries are supposed to convict on EVIDENCE, not emotion...unlike Kentucky. In this state, a jury would've heard the exact same case and been out 15 minutes and came back with the chair for her. "Somebody's gonna pay, just tell us who"--good ol' Kentucky justice. Thank God this jury decided not to be sheep and be lead around by the nose. And after all that Casey Anthony will be rich within two weeks. She's set for life. Now she can really party!

[sad]

no doubt about it. hers will come back to her

[Redneck hater]

your mom wrote:

<quoted text>
Dear Dipstick,
That is what the prosecution is supposed to do. They do it in every case. Thank you in advance for trying to act more intelligent next time.
With love,
your mom

Okay "mom" answer me this: how many trials are actually conducted here in Russell County in a year's time and of those trials, how many defendants walk out with a "not guilty"? The answer: None! Not even one person. Doesn't those odds strike you as a little...odd? Or is it because our prosecutors and fine police are just that damn good? Nope. Its because of the small town sheep mentality--"our officials cannot be wrong, if they're wrong then we're wrong because we put them in those positions...so whatever they say, we believe." Well, not me, "mom", you raised me better.

[Frankie stinky]

SHe is stupid for sure but the witnesses for the govt lied like trash.

[Well-Raylan]

I noticed how" KY Girl" didn't answer my query about How she would like to be tried. No reply on Picking one choice on how She would like to be judged. Also noticed "Stunned" didn't have a quick comeback to explain How her remarks Make Casey Guilty. I do not like Casey any more than the rest of you on here. I think she's a Looney Tune and probably should be locked up just because of her stupid ignorance and mental handicap. But so many of you would have found her guilty based on your thoughts & feelings & what you believe you would've done in her situation, or how you think you yourself would've acted. So again, you answer your own questions That ask how or Why do any of us think you couldn't get a fair trial here. You are your own answer.

[kentucky girl]

I would like to be tried by a jury of my peers, that's how! Isn't that normally how it goes, I'm pretty sure there is no "choice".....but when you are accused of murdering a baby they probably don't care what "choice" you want. I ain't sayin' she killed the kid, I just think the evidence I saw was pointing right to her....Now, I do not know if ther was evidence I didn't see, that is another matter. And, it's hard to "quickly" reply to anything on here while I am busy doing this thing called "working" ya'll should try it sometime! LOL Have a good one....

[Well-Raylan]

"Ky Girl", re-read post #21 & 22, question wasn't about picking jurors. But yes there is a choice. Attorneys interview & ask questions of potential jurors, some they pick, some they dismiss from duty. Being summoned to be a juror does not mean you will actually Be one. It's a pick & chose process. Now, back to my question, IF you were accused of some crime, would you want the jurors to judge you on: 1- What THEY think & feel THEY would do in the same situation, & how THEY believe THEY would act or react in the situation. OR 2- would you want to be judge by the evidence & Proof.????? Pick ONE.

[kentucky girl]

Pick ONE! Hey, I'm not on trial for being accused of killing my kid. She got herself into this mess, whether she killed her or not, she neglected her to the point that she died. Who doesn't know where their own child is? She was judged a little too fairly if you asked me. But, I am not a juror so my opinion is just that, an opinion...just like yours. I say watch ur kids and don't let them drown/or kill them and she wouldn't have us all judging her based on our opinions, huh?! She was found not guilty and just cuz I don't agree, doesn't mean anything....it's just an opinion. Do you know her or something? People always take stuff way TOO SERIOUSLY on this topix site, I've said it before and I'll say it again....this is a just a chatroom. I will not let rantings from here bother me, it's just silly. AND remember opinions are like butt holes, WE ALL HAVE ONE!

[lindadj@duo-coun ty.com]

there was no-one responible for casey, she did not call 911 report caylee missing, she was mad at her mother, she thinks of herself,and no-one else, she is a cruel, evil human being, she was cruel to her intire family mother,father and brother

[Redneck hater]

Again I say, she was involved somehow, be it an accomplice or just sheer not giving a $hit. But the state did not prove a crime to send her to the electric chair. Being a bad mother does not warrant the death penalty...anywhere. My gripe is that the state just expected a rubber-stamp from the jury. Don't believe me? Lok at pictures of the prosecutor during closing arguments. He was smirking and rolling his eyes! Every prosecutor is trained to walk into a courtroom like they own it. They could not prove ANY cause of death. They had no other theories. They didn't even have a real MOTIVE! A reason to commit murder of a child. So, in absence of that, they played on the emotions of the jury. Picture upon picture of that poor little child alongside her mother bumping and grinding. Again I say, this FLORIDA jury relied on PROOF and FACTS. You won't get that in a small town jury trial! You'll get "Mr. Leveridge knows best. Mr. Policeman would never charge him/her if they wasn't guilty. The grand jury wouldn't have indicted them if they weren't guilty." Those are my points again.

[Well-Raylan]

Ok several people on here have been saying how the jury is wrong, they can't believe she wasn't found guilty,etc. One person,"Stunned" I think, states why they thought she should've been found guilty, things like waiting to report child missing, partying, etc.etc., basically Casey's behavior. As I stated before I do Not like her behavior anymore than anyone else does. But just like I stated in the Grim Reeper post, I do Not believe Casey is "normal" in the sense that most people are. I believe she's a Sociopath, maybe a psychopath, and those people just plain do Not FEEL like most people do. Everything in their lives is about them. Only them. They are not attached like most. Don't know how to love. Don't connect to people. They live a life of Pretend (as evidenced by her phony jobs & other lies), and they are very Practiced at "appearing" normal but they are Not Normal. The reason she could go out dancing knowing her child was dead is because it did Not touch her or affect her. No REAL emotion. I believe she is one of if not THE most lousy excuses for a human being I've ever heard of before. And she May have killed her child. I do Not know. She may not have. Could be that someone who killed Cayllee knew exactly what she was Really like & expected her to get convicted for it. The point remains that it was Not proved that she did it. The jury was smart enough to recognize that. The other point remains that if she had been tried by the people of this & the other post she would have been found GUILTY, not because of the evidence & Proof but because she is a lousy person who does not act, feel, think, or respond the way the majority of posters on here would have. THAT is why she would not have gotten a fair trial here. The preponderance of evidence is here in black & white on these posts. And Juries are Not supposed to make their decisions like that. The charge was Murder. Not being a lousy mother & human being.

[Believer]

Stunned wrote:

i can NOT believe they found her NOT guilty.The way she acted when jury was out, waiting 31 days before telling she was missing ( then it was the Grandmother who called it in), partying, getting tattoos.Good thing I wasnt on the jury. Sad for Little Caylee. RIP.She may not get punished here on earth but her judgement day will come.

You are so right, God will her. Guess she will try to lie to him, she's so cold hearted.

[please]

Looks like she showed some emotion when they said "not guilty" Hope big Bertha has fun with Ms. Casey for the very little time she will be in there, just think if she wouldn't have lied to the police she wouldn't be doing any time. That poor baby Caylee....

[Karen Luttrell]

well first of all what about the drugs that was in the babies system, how did they get there. Second how can a mother be out partying with her baby gone. and how come the baby had duct tape on her mouth if she drowned. I don't think she can scream if she was dead, but if she was in the trunk of the car and woke up that is why she needed the duct tape. I hope the baby gets justice someday

[Well-Raylan]

Karen Luttrell wrote:

well first of all what about the drugs that was in the babies system, how did they get there. Second how can a mother be out partying with her baby gone. and how come the baby had duct tape on her mouth if she drowned. I don't think she can scream if she was dead, but if she was in the trunk of the car and woke up that is why she needed the duct tape. I hope the baby gets justice someday

The whole thing just stinks Karen, that poor child is still dead & as of now nobody is paying for it. That may change very soon. I think others may be charged with this murder. Who knows. The duct tape thing was answered in a couple of ways, one of which was that it was put there to keep the decomposing stuff from coming out. Apparently people in morgues do that too. We can not know why for sure. I think Casey is a lousy human being & should go to jail just for that. But as for How she could've gone out partying, I have a theory on that too. It's in my posts here & a page or so backwards. I sincerely believe she's a sociopath at the very least. Those folks don't feel for anyone but themselves. Don't know how. And are Not really connected to people the way you & me & almost everyone else are. I pray that baby gets justice too, I hope it happens before long. I do believe people like Casey will get what's coming to them. Because I don't think people without a conscience can ever be close to God. So she will have her day sooner or later.