Wednesday Nov 11 | Posted by: roboblogger
Comments
|
"'Some of those early-diagnosed cases would not manifest clinically during that woman's lifetime,' ABC Online quoted Morrell, as saying."
WOW. And exactly how are they going to determine which of these women will live long enough to die of breast cancer, and which ones will die of something else first? Who wants to sign up for this new form of Russian Roulette? Not me! |
||||
|
PS -- This has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with "over-diagnosing."
What this is saying is that 75% of the time, breast cancer IS life-threatening. What other disease would we say is over-diagnosed because it's only life-threatening 75% of the time??? It's absurd. What is the matter with these researchers???? |
||||
|
||||
Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.
| Topic | Updated | Last By | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opinion: With mammograms, listen to the experts | 10 min | Gail Perry | 1 |
| Better fight against cancer | 1 hr | Gail Perry | 3 |
| Ind. family claims drug gave mom cancer | 5 hr | elvis | 1 |
| Linda Ellerbee: Mammograms have their place | 6 hr | again | 1 |
| New mammogram advice raises questions, concerns | 7 hr | chief22 | 25 |
| 604 reasons | 7 hr | Of By And Fo... | 1 |
| Study Questions Safety of Mammograms for Young ... | 7 hr | Philip W Cha... | 1 |