reality

Adelaide, Australia

#61 Jul 8, 2013
against the british (serbia)
reality

Adelaide, Australia

#62 Jul 8, 2013
how sweet is victory,..
scotland the brave,
beats the evil empire.
is that dramatic enough for the queens of serbia topix?

i guess u hillbillies do not know history of the superior nations of europe,
the scottish are the end result of irish migration to the english mainland.
(read the rest for urself u lazy bastards)
they, like the croats, do not give up easily.
unlike the serbs previously known as croatia citizans.
hofukin ho.
VojnikCro

Newbury, UK

#63 Jul 8, 2013
Dalmatin wrote:
<quoted text>Quater plan ? Most historical accounts have refered to the 3 thirds genocide policy of the ustasi regieme :
1/3 Serbs to be deported to Serbia = 300,000 Serbs
1/3 Serbs to be converted to Roman Catholisism = 300,000 Serbs
1/3 Serbs to be killed = 300,000 Serbs
but even this equation can not account for the fact that just 90,000 Serbs were killed in WW2 Croatia & NOT 300,000 !!!!
Yeah I think you are right about the thirds plan not the quarter plan must have got mixed up with something else .....But its a far cry from the 2 million that Serbs claim were killed
Dalmatin

Adelaide, Australia

#64 Jul 8, 2013
Koraly wrote:
<quoted text>
No I am not from the Balkans but my roots are in the Balkans and I know the similarities but just don't understand why there is so much hatred even between people who haven't been involved in wars recently Macedonians and Bulgarians.
What roots may they be ?

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#65 Jul 8, 2013
reality wrote:
how sweet is victory,..
scotland the brave,
beats the evil empire.
is that dramatic enough for the queens of serbia topix?
i guess u hillbillies do not know history of the superior nations of europe,
the scottish are the end result of irish migration to the english mainland.
(read the rest for urself u lazy bastards)
they, like the croats, do not give up easily.
unlike the serbs previously known as croatia citizans.
hofukin ho.
What are you on about ? The scots have been the biyatches of the English since 1707 and are happy to stay subservient. You should read some history.
Greater serbia

Woodside, NY

#66 Jul 8, 2013
Croats are ustasa nazi's!!!

Muslim Turks are green fundamentalists!!!

Serbians are cetnik freedom fighters who defended the country and nation in WW1 WW2 and the Yugoslav civil wars in the 1990's!!!

Chetniks fought the Muslim Turks, Croat communists and Croat ustasa nazi's this I reality read history books so you guys can learn the truth about the past and why the conflict in Yugo really started and who really started it then u will understand the serb position which is right!!!

CCCC
VojnikCro

Leicester, UK

#67 Jul 8, 2013
Greater serbia wrote:
Croats are ustasa nazi's!!!
Muslim Turks are green fundamentalists!!!
Serbians are cetnik freedom fighters who defended the country and nation in WW1 WW2 and the Yugoslav civil wars in the 1990's!!!
Chetniks fought the Muslim Turks, Croat communists and Croat ustasa nazi's this I reality read history books so you guys can learn the truth about the past and why the conflict in Yugo really started and who really started it then u will understand the serb position which is right!!!
CCCC
You don't even know wtf you're talking about you fcking failed abortion !!!!

Serbs started all of wars and ethnic cleansing in Ex Yu..........

Do.some research yourself you idiot

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#68 Jul 8, 2013
VojnikCro wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't even know wtf you're talking about you fcking failed abortion !!!!
Serbs started all of wars and ethnic cleansing in Ex Yu..........
Do.some research yourself you idiot
Just a note, I know they started all the wars and ethnic cleansing which they shouldn't have, but to anyone who isn't in the know, it all started after the states wanted independence, some warp history and make it seem that they wanted independence because of the wars and ethnic cleansing.

Of course Serbs dealt with it in the wrong way, they should have just left the states to be independent and watched them fail and collapse and then come running back to them, which is what Russia did to Ukraine and Belarus, both are now near failed states while Russia is prospering, both are now desperately wanting to be part of Russia again (crying Belarussians and Ukrainians are Russians we are the same people we shouldn't be divided) but, smart Russia is taking it nice and slowly until they become even more desperate and have no choice. Wait a minute are Serbs really brothers of the Russians, because as it seems Russians are Smart and Serbs are ... well not.

We shouldn't focus on who started it like little pre-school children who are in trouble with the teacher (he punched me first .... no he punched me first), but should rather focus on why, was there any point in it all and what is the way forward.
VojnikCro

Leicester, UK

#69 Jul 8, 2013
Koraly wrote:
<quoted text>
Just a note, I know they started all the wars and ethnic cleansing which they shouldn't have, but to anyone who isn't in the know, it all started after the states wanted independence, some warp history and make it seem that they wanted independence because of the wars and ethnic cleansing.
Of course Serbs dealt with it in the wrong way, they should have just left the states to be independent and watched them fail and collapse and then come running back to them, which is what Russia did to Ukraine and Belarus, both are now near failed states while Russia is prospering, both are now desperately wanting to be part of Russia again (crying Belarussians and Ukrainians are Russians we are the same people we shouldn't be divided) but, smart Russia is taking it nice and slowly until they become even more desperate and have no choice. Wait a minute are Serbs really brothers of the Russians, because as it seems Russians are Smart and Serbs are ... well not.
We shouldn't focus on who started it like little pre-school children who are in trouble with the teacher (he punched me first .... no he punched me first), but should rather focus on why, was there any point in it all and what is the way forward.
Not strictly true because Slovenia and Croatia were the two wealthiest republics in Ex yu so.would have been much better off had there not been wars which ruined Croatias booming tourist industry.

I agree we shouldnt keep arguing about who started it like little kids. But while the Serbs continue to lie about the wars that happened then I cannot see this problem being resolved any time soon.
Vlastimir

Ljubljana, Slovenia

#70 Jul 8, 2013
Serbonazis wrote:
<quoted text>another servian lie and myth of being the victims
alvanian tatar fck off

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#71 Jul 8, 2013
VojnikCro wrote:
<quoted text>
Not strictly true because Slovenia and Croatia were the two wealthiest republics in Ex yu so.would have been much better off had there not been wars which ruined Croatias booming tourist industry.
I agree we shouldnt keep arguing about who started it like little kids. But while the Serbs continue to lie about the wars that happened then I cannot see this problem being resolved any time soon.
Not strictly true because the biggest mistake of people who live in federations is that they think they are the only ones that contributed, the only ones which worked in the federation that everything they have is solely because of their hard work and no one else contributed to their development at all. Same mentality is witnessed with nationalists in Texas: that the whole USA depends on them when the rest of the USA contributed a lot to Texas; and the same with nationalists in Catalonia: that claim Spain did not contribute at all to the development of Barcelona, that they built it all by themselves without the use of any Spanish resources; Ukrainians also had the same mentality: "It is our agriculture which is feeding the Russians, why should we continue to be exploited and continue feeding them, they will starve without us" and look where they ended up begging their government to form a union with Russia, and Belarus begging to once again be part of Russia where 20 years ago they would have killed anyone who even though they are Russian. Same problem was witnessed in South Africa where the blacks said: we built everything, the whites exploited black labour to build their cities, the whites just stole the cities we built; and the whites said: it was out skills and engineering which built the cities, the blacks are just lazy who want our cities without work, where as in reality both together built the cities, the whites did the engineering the blacks did the labour but both claim they are the only contributors and we know what the result of that mentality if you compare South Africa back then with South Africa now. You can compare it with a non-federal country where you have the rich capital and the poor mining and agricultural townships, the rich capital depends on those poor townships, without them they would be just as poor if not poorer. However we cannot make that comparison with Yugoslavia because we don't know how Slovenia, Serbia, and Croatia would have ended up if there weren't any wars.

So my point was Serbs should not have started the wars and just let all states have their independence, let everyone's living standards decline and then let them discover for themselves why Yugoslavia was formed in the first place, and what the benefits of Yugoslavia were, but now whoever Yugoslavia is brought up everyone remembers only the wars which happened only after Yugoslavia dissolved.

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#72 Jul 8, 2013
whenever* not whoever
reality

Adelaide, Australia

#73 Jul 8, 2013
Strahd wrote:
<quoted text>
What are you on about ? The scots have been the biyatches of the English since 1707 and are happy to stay subservient. You should read some history.
are they happy?
u should check out current affairs more often.
reality

Burwood, Australia

#74 Jul 8, 2013
reality wrote:
how sweet is victory,..
scotland the brave,
beats the empire.
he he Murray doesn't even play for "Scotland" he chose to be called British, because he knows that his native scotland is the kurva of england, much like the croats who have always been kurve to the austrohungarians then the nazis then with their communist leader tito. at least you recognized serbia as an empire bravo for you.
Gyilkos

Ljubljana, Slovenia

#75 Jul 10, 2013
Only In Jasenovac 1.500.000 - 2.000.000 Serbs were killed by croat nazis
Gyilkos

Ljubljana, Slovenia

#76 Jul 10, 2013
reality wrote:
croats are the bravest! Not because they are not afraid of anything, it's because they are not ashamed on anything
yep

Jovan Ducic was right

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#77 Jul 10, 2013
reality wrote:
<quoted text>
are they happy?
u should check out current affairs more often.
I agree with the other 'reality' that said that the Scots are kurvas for the Brits, much like the Croats for the Austro Hungarians, or Germans these days.

The Scots are happy enough, and lets just say that they have other things on their mind lol.

http://www.topix.com/forum/uk/glasgow
drug_precednik

Ljubljana, Slovenia

#78 Jul 16, 2013
Dalmatin wrote:
<quoted text>Reality : Vladimir Prelog was Croat by nationality as he was born in Croatia & lived there all his life
Reality : SLAVoljub Penkala was Croat by nationality as he was born in Croatia & lived there all his life
Reality : Josip Broz Tito was No.1 Croat by fathers side of family, No.2 Josip Broz Tito was Croat by nationality as he was born in Kumrovec, Kgdm. of Croatia-Slavonia & served in Croatian Domobrani unit in Austro-Hungarian army, No. 4 the names Josip & Broz are typical Croatian names, No.5 Tito himself declared himself Croat in 1945 when he was asked if he was born Catholic, in which he replied "Yes I'am Croat therefore i'am Catholic. No.6 Tito declared officialy in 1971 Yugoslav Party Congress " "Ja sam Hrvat ", No.7 Yes Tito's mother was Slovene but Tito never called himself Slovene.! Tito always called himself Yugoslav & or Croat, No. 8 google ref.: Josip Broz Tito wiki (wikipedia) Tito's ethnicity is stated as Croat not Slovene or Yugoslav
God Bless Tito !!!! Smrt fasisti, Sloboda Naroda !!!!
You know very well that Slavoljub Penkala was Polish Jew, Vladimir Prelog was Slovene and Czech and mother of Josip Broz Tito was Slovene
VojnikCro

Nottingham, UK

#79 Jul 16, 2013
drug_precednik wrote:
<quoted text>
You know very well that Slavoljub Penkala was Polish Jew, Vladimir Prelog was Slovene and Czech and mother of Josip Broz Tito was Slovene
Tito was half Croat half Slovene
gradec_

Ljubljana, Slovenia

#80 Jul 16, 2013
VojnikCro wrote:
<quoted text>
Tito was half Croat half Slovene
Correct

Josip Broz Tito was half Croat half Slovene

his mother was Slovene and his father was Croat

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Serbia Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Turks to servs : We are your fathers ! We are c... 33 min srbosjek 12
Kosovo is Holy Land to Serbs But Not to Albanians 52 min Teddy_ 6
Edi Rama: Serbia to consider attitude towards K... 1 hr Amen 1
Kosovo is servian only if my mother is a virgin... 1 hr srbosjek 52
Sign Petition to UEFA, Serbia racist and violent 1 hr King Genti 9
SHOCK! K Albanian ISIS fighter waves a sword ! 1 hr -Piper- 51
Serbia makes Kosovo IOC member 2 hr blimey 2

Serbia People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE