Comments
381 - 400 of 425 Comments Last updated Friday Aug 22
blundunt

Midlothian, IL

#394 Nov 17, 2012
prishtina wrote:
Serbs were always allies with arabs and middle east, even today.
They were?(are)?

Since: Mar 07

Prishtina, Kosovo

#395 Nov 20, 2012
Serbs today support Asad just like they supported every dictator and terrorist before - Saddam, Gadafi, Bin Laden, Putin and all the others.

“Kosova, gjaku im qe nuk falet!”

Since: Sep 09

Kosova, Albania

#396 Nov 22, 2012
servs love circumcized...!

Since: Sep 09

Location hidden

#397 Jan 1, 2013
Free Vojvodina wrote:
serbian vassalage
http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/battles_...
Disastrous finale to what was in effect a crusade launched against the Ottoman Turks. The crusader army was based on the Hungarian army of Sigismund of Luxembourg, with a large French element led by some of the greatest French nobles, including Marshal Boucicautalong with German, Polish, Italian and English elements. The army may have reached sixty thousand men, a vast army for the time, and was almost entirely cavalry. Sigismund crossed into Ottoman territory, and laid siege to Nicopolis, a large Bulgarian city. The Ottoman sultan, Bajazet, was not rushed into reaction, and waited for his entire army to muster before responding. The Ottoman army formed up some four miles from the Crusader camp, and invited attack.
Sigismund proposed to use his own horse-archers as the first attack, with the Crusader cavalry in reserve to deliver the decisive blow against the Ottoman lines. However, the French leaders refused any role that denied them the first attack, and leaving the Hungarian army behind, they charged the centre of the Ottoman line, where they thought there was a cavalry force for them to attack. However, once the French knights came within range, the Ottoman horse-archers let loose a volley, then pulled aside to reveal well dug-in archers behinds rows of wooden stakes.
Despite taking heavy casualties, the French broke through to the archers, and were also able to hold off an attack by Ottoman cavalry, before finally being beaten by the arrival of yet another cavalry force. The French took severe casualties, including Philip, Count of Bar, and Jean de Vienne, the Admiral, although many more were captured.
The Hungarian royal army, meanwhile, was moving towards the battle. Sigismund's force was engaged with the Ottoman cavalry, when it was ambushed by the Serbian allies of Sultan Bajazet, led by Stephen Lazarevitch, who had retained his lands at the price of becoming an Ottoman vassal. This attack by the Serbs broke the Hungarians, and when Sigismunds banner was cast down, the army dissolved.
Sigismund himself managed to escape downstream to Constantinople, but the Sultan, apparently enraged by earlier massacres of Turkish prisoners, killed all but a dozen of his French captives. Very few survivors of the battle returned to the west. Those that did blamed the Hungarians for the defeat, although the appalling behaviour of the French knights was in reality a major cause of the disaster. Fortunately for Europe, Bajazet was more concerned with his lands in Turkey, where he had established himself as ruler, before meeting his match in Timur, who defeated and captured him in 1402.
Serbia betrayed Europe and Slavism.

Serbs aided the Turks.

Serbs were once Turks themselves then they acquired a Slavic culture then they became full Turks again after 1389.

Serbs are Turks.

Since: Mar 07

Prishtina, Kosovo

#398 Jan 2, 2013
Serbs are the restless talebans of Europe, always making problems!
croatAndalbaniaV assalage

Slovenia

#399 Jan 2, 2013
MiIivoj wrote:
<quoted text>
Serbia betrayed Europe and Slavism.
Serbs aided the Turks.
Serbs were once Turks themselves then they acquired a Slavic culture then they became full Turks again after 1389.
Serbs are Turks.
croatia betrayed Europe and Slavism
croats were once Turks themselves then they acquired a Slavic culture then they became full Turks again
croats were Turks before 1389 during 1389 and after 1389

with zero victories against their brothers Turks

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Krbava...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Klis

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_Of_Gvozdan...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Szigetv...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Moh%C3...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_%C4%90...
croatAndalbanian Vassalage

Slovenia

#400 Jan 2, 2013
prishtina wrote:
Serbs are the restless talebans of Europe, always making problems!
albanians are the restless talebans and talibans of Europe,always making problems
croatAndalbanian Vassalage

Slovenia

#401 Jan 2, 2013
synCROnize wrote:
<quoted text>incorrect croats first settled east slavonia and south of neretva then after that serbs had times of rule there.
vlah were migrating heavily in the ottaman years and also lived in south serbia and illyria.
serb first settled in rascia area but under attacks from bulgaria serbs migrated to north serbia and looked to go west aswel. a typical event of this is prince zaharija getting attacked by bulgaria and asking croatian king tomislav for protection and was a refugee in croatia. bulgaria from 7 century to the 9 century either owned serbia-rascia or attacked it.
the reality is different

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Velbaz...
Robert Lucas

Perth, Australia

#402 Jan 2, 2013
synCROnize wrote:
2.?what exactly?
Serbs didn't seek refuge in Croatia but in Austria and they were valued as a good soldiers and been given them greater rights than cowardly Croats. There is one of the reasons where the Croatian jealousy comes from, which caused their irrational behaviour against Serbs (Uskoci). And another thing being Catholic doesn't mean automathicaly your Croat. A lot of Serbs were Catholics at the time.

Since: Mar 07

Prishtina, Kosovo

#403 Jan 4, 2013
Robert Lucas wrote:
<quoted text>
Serbs didn't seek refuge in Croatia but in Austria and they were valued as a good soldiers and been given them greater rights than cowardly Croats. There is one of the reasons where the Croatian jealousy comes from, which caused their irrational behaviour against Serbs (Uskoci). And another thing being Catholic doesn't mean automathicaly your Croat. A lot of Serbs were Catholics at the time.
what a joke!

“Kosova, gjaku im qe nuk falet!”

Since: Sep 09

Kosova, Albania

#404 Jan 4, 2013
servs sided by muslim Turks ?!?

Since: Mar 07

Prishtina, Kosovo

#405 Jan 6, 2013
Serbs always sided with turks against the Balkans nations.

“Kosova, gjaku im qe nuk falet!”

Since: Sep 09

Kosova, Albania

#406 Jan 16, 2013
Omg!!!

Since: Mar 07

Prishtina, Kosovo

#407 Jan 17, 2013
Now rebuilding the strong ties with Arabs again.

“Kosova, gjaku im qe nuk falet!”

Since: Sep 09

Kosova, Albania

#408 Jan 17, 2013
Fkin servs...

Since: Mar 07

Prishtina, Kosovo

#409 Jan 18, 2013
During the Balkans crusaders fight against the Ottoman Empire, Serbs as usual sided with Turks.

The Ottoman force also included 1,500 Serbian heavy cavalry knights under the command of Prince Stefan Lazarevic, who was Sultan Bayezid's vassal since the Battle of Kosovo in 1389, as well as his brother-in-law after the Sultan married Stefan's sister, Princess Olivera Despina, the daughter of Prince Lazar of Serbia (Stefan's father) who had perished at Kosovo.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Nicopo...

“Kosova, gjaku im qe nuk falet!”

Since: Sep 09

Kosova, Albania

#410 Jan 18, 2013
prishtina wrote:
During the Balkans crusaders fight against the Ottoman Empire, Serbs as usual sided with Turks.
The Ottoman force also included 1,500 Serbian heavy cavalry knights under the command of Prince Stefan Lazarevic, who was Sultan Bayezid's vassal since the Battle of Kosovo in 1389, as well as his brother-in-law after the Sultan married Stefan's sister, Princess Olivera Despina, the daughter of Prince Lazar of Serbia (Stefan's father) who had perished at Kosovo.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Nicopo...
Absolutely correct !

Since: Mar 07

Prishtina, Kosovo

#411 Jan 21, 2013
refresh!

“Kosova, gjaku im qe nuk falet!”

Since: Sep 09

Kosova, Albania

#412 Jan 25, 2013
...for the second time !

“Kosova, gjaku im qe nuk falet!”

Since: Sep 09

Kosova, Albania

#413 Jan 26, 2013
why did they(servs) sided with Turks ?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Serbia Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Once more on fascism knocking on the Balkan doo... (Aug '09) 10 min Tubal Cain 1,012
Croatia Accuses Serbia of Genocide at UN Court 27 min BJ4me 944
Beogradski pobjednik je albanac 1 hr Teddy_ 2
Pope Francis explains why he chose Albania 1 hr UtterNutter 2
NYT : Albanian language amongst the oldest ones... 1 hr UtterNutter 21
Serbia's foreign policy: Divided loyalties 2 hr joj 8
Croat, Serb organisations urge reconciliation (Jan '14) 2 hr joj 9,567
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••

Serbia People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••