Report: North Korea boosting ground support to Syrian regime

Full story: Stars and Stripes

After decades of covert military assistance, North Koreans are believed to be providing increased ground support to the Syrian regime, in addition to that of Hezbollah and Iranian fighters.
Comments
21 - 40 of 56 Comments Last updated Jun 26, 2013

Since: Nov 12

Australia

#21 Jun 14, 2013
Tasmaniac wrote:
<quoted text>
No they didn't. They got pounded and then quarter of a million chinks ran across the border to help..

That's why the McCarthy rampage got stopped in its tracks when every conceivable mechanized advantage went their way.
And the only way out was to threaten to drop the atomic bomb.
Stalin would have dropped the bomb in 1942 if he had one.
But in 1944 when the war was won No way.
Just goes to show morality is much higher on my side of the fence.
Syrian

Waterford, CT

#22 Jun 14, 2013
Tasmaniac wrote:
<quoted text>
No they didn't. They got pounded and then quarter of a million chinks ran across the border to help..
Only a truce stopped them from overrunning the entire Korean peninsula! The US actually considered having to use nuclear weapons to stop them.

Since: Nov 12

Sydney, Australia

#23 Jun 14, 2013
Stalin also gave the world the Welfare State.
That was a response to the threat communism posed.
As it turns out its only the Welfare State that allows Capital the ability to avoid the rush towards concentration , when there is no new industry or resource to exploit.
Which is always now.
So Stalin actually saved capitalism.
Syrian

Waterford, CT

#24 Jun 14, 2013
rtloder wrote:
Stalin also gave the world the Welfare State.
That was a response to the threat communism posed.
As it turns out its only the Welfare State that allows Capital the ability to avoid the rush towards concentration , when there is no new industry or resource to exploit.
Which is always now.
So Stalin actually saved capitalism.
Good point!
Avenger

Hamilton, Canada

#25 Jun 14, 2013
Syrian wrote:
<quoted text> Only a truce stopped them from overrunning the entire Korean peninsula! The US actually considered having to use nuclear weapons to stop them.
The front in Korea was not moving much when the armistice was called in 1953.
BS seems to be your thing your an expert Syrian.

Since: Nov 12

Australia

#26 Jun 14, 2013
China was also in a famine at the time and was not nuclear armed. The thing to remember is 5 million died supporting the North , half a million in the South.
The US just tried a little adventure last year with the Diaoyu Islands, the Chinese had to be restrained , where as the Japanese did absolutely nothing .
That's the thing about giving out curry it doesn't get forgotten about.
Syrian

Waterford, CT

#27 Jun 15, 2013
Avenger wrote:
<quoted text>
The front in Korea was not moving much when the armistice was called in 1953.
BS seems to be your thing your an expert Syrian.
It would help if you actually learned about the Korean war before you opened your clueless mouth. The US was up against the wall in Korea, and without a truce they would have lost the war just like they did in Vietnam. This is why they were getting ready to use nuclear weapons as a last ditch effort to wrestle victory from defeat.
Syrian

Waterford, CT

#28 Jun 16, 2013
rtloder wrote:
China was also in a famine at the time and was not nuclear armed. The thing to remember is 5 million died supporting the North , half a million in the South.
The US just tried a little adventure last year with the Diaoyu Islands, the Chinese had to be restrained , where as the Japanese did absolutely nothing .
That's the thing about giving out curry it doesn't get forgotten about.
China had millions of soldiers they could have sent into the Korean peninsula! There would have been no way to stop them without going nuclear.

Since: Nov 12

Saint Marys, Australia

#30 Jun 16, 2013
Syrian wrote:
<quoted text> China had millions of soldiers they could have sent into the Korean peninsula! There would have been no way to stop them without going nuclear.

Good point .
And when China massed a gigantic fleet to invade Japan, when Spain did the same thing to Britain Allah sent them to the bottom .
What we Salafi make of that is fundamental to what is happening now.
It is the journey and not the destination that is important.
Avenger

Hamilton, Canada

#31 Jun 16, 2013
Syrian wrote:
<quoted text> It would help if you actually learned about the Korean war before you opened your clueless mouth. The US was up against the wall in Korea, and without a truce they would have lost the war just like they did in Vietnam. This is why they were getting ready to use nuclear weapons as a last ditch effort to wrestle victory from defeat.
Your an idiot Syrian you don't have the faintest clue.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#32 Jun 16, 2013
rtloder wrote:
<quoted text>That's why the McCarthy rampage got stopped in its tracks when every conceivable mechanized advantage went their way.
And the only way out was to threaten to drop the atomic bomb.
Stalin would have dropped the bomb in 1942 if he had one.
But in 1944 when the war was won No way.
Just goes to show morality is much higher on my side of the fence.
Who is McCarthy dumbass?

The UN pushed NK up into china. The Chinese (with Russian help) pushed them back down. The idea of the nuke was to pound china into submission and finish the war. Instead, a family has been able to kill everyone who disagrees with them and have 2nd and 3rd generation prisoners for the sake of their reign over NK while they plunder it and keep their people in poverty.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#33 Jun 16, 2013
Syrian wrote:
<quoted text>Only a truce stopped them from overrunning the entire Korean peninsula! The US actually considered having to use nuclear weapons to stop them.
And they should've used nukes. The world would've been a much better place today..

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#34 Jun 16, 2013
Syrian wrote:
<quoted text>It would help if you actually learned about the Korean war before you opened your clueless mouth. The US was up against the wall in Korea, and without a truce they would have lost the war just like they did in Vietnam. This is why they were getting ready to use nuclear weapons as a last ditch effort to wrestle victory from defeat.
Speaking of clueless...
Antiwar

Chatham, Canada

#35 Jun 16, 2013
Tasmaniac wrote:
<quoted text>
And they should've used nukes. The world would've been a much better place today..
Yeah starting a nuclear war between america and russia would have made the world a much better place... lmao
Antiwar

Chatham, Canada

#36 Jun 16, 2013
Speaking of clueless...
Syrian

Waterford, CT

#37 Jun 17, 2013
Tasmaniac wrote:
<quoted text>
And they should've used nukes. The world would've been a much better place today..
Nuke all of China, and kill millions of innocent people?

Since: Nov 12

Australia

#38 Jun 17, 2013
Tasmaniac wrote:
<quoted text>
Who is McCarthy dumbass?
The UN pushed NK up into china. The Chinese (with Russian help) pushed them back down. The idea of the nuke was to pound china into submission and finish the war. Instead, a family has been able to kill everyone who disagrees with them and have 2nd and 3rd generation prisoners for the sake of their reign over NK while they plunder it and keep their people in poverty.

General Nancy Mc Arthur was such a queer they named the queer era after him
and insisted on spelling it McCuntless but this proved too "bibulous" so they changed it to changed it to McCarthy.
Syrian

Waterford, CT

#39 Jun 17, 2013
rtloder wrote:
<quoted text>
General Nancy Mc Arthur was such a queer they named the queer era after him
and insisted on spelling it McCuntless but this proved too "bibulous" so they changed it to changed it to McCarthy.
LOL!!!

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#40 Jun 17, 2013
Antiwar wrote:
<quoted text>Yeah starting a nuclear war between america and russia would have made the world a much better place... lmao
Russia wouldn't want to risk even more nuclear fallout

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#41 Jun 17, 2013
Syrian wrote:
<quoted text>Nuke all of China, and kill millions of innocent people?
Yeah, it would be a win win. Win the war and depopulate the most populated country in the world..

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

North Korea Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
north korean gold buyers and investors (Aug '11) Aug 27 ANTHONYMWANGANGI 8
North Korea calls US 'graveyard of human rights' Aug 27 bottlecap 1
N.Korean ship aground off Mexico Aug 21 Glideaway 1
Pope urges Korean reconciliation, prays for per... Aug 18 Ainu 1
Pope kicks off Asia missionary boost in SKorea Aug 16 SpaceBlues 2
Canada in diplomatic talks with China to releas... Aug 6 Polley 1
WAR: North Korea vs South Korea - Who Would Win? Aug 2 Italian American 2
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••

North Korea People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••