First Prev
of 3
Next Last

“Educating Utus”

Since: Aug 10

Wanganui, New Zealand

#1 Jan 19, 2013
In a blatant attempt to censor free speech, the Topix moderator has removed the threads "Dirty Maoris" and "Maoris or Monkeys"
No threads denegrating whites have been removed.
Same Old Racist Crap

Christchurch, New Zealand

#2 Jan 19, 2013
Torqueing Heads wrote:
In a blatant attempt to censor free speech, the Topix moderator has removed the threads "Dirty Maoris" and "Maoris or Monkeys"
No threads denegrating whites have been removed.
More like they censored your uncontrollable hate speech.

You lack the ability to voice facts rationally. You continuously shout your personal dislike of anyone different than yourself (and in some cases people of the same ethnicity) whilst always resorting to evil hate-filled rantings. That in itself shows your extreme lack of intelligence.

Good on the moderators for doing their job.

“Educating Utus”

Since: Aug 10

Wanganui, New Zealand

#3 Jan 19, 2013
I am the voice of the majority of New Zealanders who have had enough of the trashing of our country by part Maoris.
Nothing that spineless wimps like you and the moderator can do will change that.
Anonymous

Ashfield, Australia

#4 Jan 19, 2013
Same Old Racist Crap wrote:
More like they censored your uncontrollable hate speech.
So why aren't they also censoring the far worse hate speech from the Maoris who post on here? Such as the endless ones saying how Maoris are superior humans to everyone else and how white NZlanders are the worst trash or earth or whatever else?

“Tino Rangatiratanga”

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#5 Jan 19, 2013
Same Old Racist Crap wrote:
<quoted text>
More like they censored your uncontrollable hate speech.
You lack the ability to voice facts rationally. You continuously shout your personal dislike of anyone different than yourself (and in some cases people of the same ethnicity) whilst always resorting to evil hate-filled rantings. That in itself shows your extreme lack of intelligence.
Good on the moderators for doing their job.
Well said, and good on the moderators too.
Same Old Racist Crap

Queenstown, New Zealand

#7 Jan 19, 2013
Torqueing Heads wrote:
Nothing that spineless wimps like you and the moderator can do will change that.
Nothing you have ever posted will make a real difference to society. For good or for bad. Your lack of intelligence has seen to that.
Same Old Racist Crap

Queenstown, New Zealand

#8 Jan 19, 2013
Must_be_joking_me wrote:
<quoted text>So why aren't they also censoring the far worse hate speech from the Maoris who post on here?
Because no one has bothered to "report abuse" on those posts?
Must_be_joking_me wrote:
<quoted text>So Such as the endless ones saying how Maoris are superior humans to everyone else and how white NZlanders are the worst trash or earth or whatever else?
You cannot be serious in comparing that sort of commentary with Torqueing Heads typical hate speech such as "Andres Brevik, he's great and I'd like to do the same as him here in NZ, but only worse" etc.

I am in no way saying two wrongs make a right, but if Torqueing Heads, Tweeter, and their ilk refrained from hate speech and instead tried to get their point across in an intellectual and rational way, then those who feel it necessary to respond in kind, would not do so.
Anonymous

Ashfield, Australia

#9 Jan 19, 2013
Same Old Racist Crap wrote:
Because no one has bothered to "report abuse" on those posts?
Correction; YOU haven't bothered. It's clearly you dooing this and clearly you whom has a problem tolerating free speech.
Same Old Racist Crap wrote:
You cannot be serious in comparing that sort of commentary with Torqueing Heads typical hate speech such as "Andres Brevik, he's great and I'd like to do the same as him here in NZ, but only worse" etc.
I am in no way saying two wrongs make a right, but if Torqueing Heads, Tweeter, and their ilk refrained from hate speech and instead tried to get their point across in an intellectual and rational way, then those who feel it necessary to respond in kind, would not do so.
Well I am serious, and looking objectively I see what Maoris say as WORSE. Not only do they readily talk about wiping out the "Pakeha"s or sending them home to Europe, almost everything they post is an embellishment of the facts to inaccurately paint Maoris as superior sportsmen and white people as Pedophiles and criminals (which is hilarious considering the recorded statistics).

And even if what the Maoris are saying isn't as bad, it's still more than bad enough to constitute "hate speech".
Clearly you are not capable of applying a consistent standard.
Same Old Racist Crap

Queenstown, New Zealand

#10 Jan 19, 2013
Must_be_joking_me wrote:
<quoted text>Correction; YOU haven't bothered. It's clearly you dooing this and clearly you whom has a problem tolerating free speech.<quoted text>Well I am serious, and looking objectively I see what Maoris say as WORSE. Not only do they readily talk about wiping out the "Pakeha"s or sending them home to Europe, almost everything they post is an embellishment of the facts to inaccurately paint Maoris as superior sportsmen and white people as Pedophiles and criminals (which is hilarious considering the recorded statistics).
And even if what the Maoris are saying isn't as bad, it's still more than bad enough to constitute "hate speech".
Clearly you are not capable of applying a consistent standard.
You comment as is to bring to light the "hidden secret" of who reported Torqueing Heads to the Topix moderators. There was never any secret as to it being me who reported his hate speech. I even told him so in one of his now deleted posts. There is a huge difference between relevant free speech and irrelevant hate speech. I have no issue with the former, even if I disagree with what is being postulated, but the latter has no place in a civilised society. Also, there is a difference between "go back to England honkey" and "I wish I was able to commit the same act as that Norwegian mass murderer" Please enlighten me as to why you do not see the difference. If some of the posts made by others you deem not up to the required standard, then what is stopping you from showing your concern? I would applaud you for having the intestinal fortitude to do so. Once again, there is a huge difference between relevant free speech and irrelevant hate speech. Torqueing Heads has very infrequently done the first, but is continuously doing the second. He's even started making more hate speech posts under his new "Barbaric island coon" moniker.

“Educating Utus”

Since: Aug 10

Wanganui, New Zealand

#11 Jan 19, 2013
Must_be_joking_me wrote:
<quoted text>Correction; YOU haven't bothered. It's clearly you dooing this and clearly you whom has a problem tolerating free speech.<quoted text>Well I am serious, and looking objectively I see what Maoris say as WORSE. Not only do they readily talk about wiping out the "Pakeha"s or sending them home to Europe, almost everything they post is an embellishment of the facts to inaccurately paint Maoris as superior sportsmen and white people as Pedophiles and criminals (which is hilarious considering the recorded statistics).
And even if what the Maoris are saying isn't as bad, it's still more than bad enough to constitute "hate speech".
Clearly you are not capable of applying a consistent standard.
'Same old' is clearly either an utu or a spineless white apologist who believes savages are normal human beings, despite the statistical evidence to the contrary.
Tweeter

Auckland, New Zealand

#12 Jan 19, 2013
Same Old Racist Crap wrote:
<quoted text>
You comment as is to bring to light the "hidden secret" of who reported Torqueing Heads to the Topix moderators. There was never any secret as to it being me who reported his hate speech. I even told him so in one of his now deleted posts. There is a huge difference between relevant free speech and irrelevant hate speech. I have no issue with the former, even if I disagree with what is being postulated, but the latter has no place in a civilised society. Also, there is a difference between "go back to England honkey" and "I wish I was able to commit the same act as that Norwegian mass murderer" Please enlighten me as to why you do not see the difference. If some of the posts made by others you deem not up to the required standard, then what is stopping you from showing your concern? I would applaud you for having the intestinal fortitude to do so. Once again, there is a huge difference between relevant free speech and irrelevant hate speech. Torqueing Heads has very infrequently done the first, but is continuously doing the second. He's even started making more hate speech posts under his new "Barbaric island coon" moniker.
Ha ,you spent 25 $ US to get a post removed.Pathetic .
Anonymous

Ashfield, Australia

#13 Jan 19, 2013
Same Old Racist Crap wrote:
<quoted text>
You comment as is to bring to light the "hidden secret" of who reported Torqueing Heads to the Topix moderators. There was never any secret as to it being me who reported his hate speech. I even told him so in one of his now deleted posts. There is a huge difference between relevant free speech and irrelevant hate speech. I have no issue with the former, even if I disagree with what is being postulated, but the latter has no place in a civilised society. Also, there is a difference between "go back to England honkey" and "I wish I was able to commit the same act as that Norwegian mass murderer" Please enlighten me as to why you do not see the difference. If some of the posts made by others you deem not up to the required standard, then what is stopping you from showing your concern? I would applaud you for having the intestinal fortitude to do so. Once again, there is a huge difference between relevant free speech and irrelevant hate speech. Torqueing Heads has very infrequently done the first, but is continuously doing the second. He's even started making more hate speech posts under his new "Barbaric island coon" moniker.
Oh what rubbish!

There is NO difference between one of the Maoris posting "we should get rid of the honkies" and talks of genocide against Maoris. And for your information; there have been Maoris posting about murdering white people (and usually after being presented with an accepted fact they didn't want to be informed of).

People should be allowed to say whatever they want as much as it should stand to be debated as long as it doesn't advocate direct harm against an individual. If anyone was posting anyone's address or singling-out someone for physical harm you might have a point but in the meantime you're just a biased intolerant.
Same Old Racist Crap

Queenstown, New Zealand

#14 Jan 19, 2013
Tweeter wrote:
<quoted text>
Ha ,you spent 25 $ US to get a post removed.Pathetic .
Ha. Actually, there were three posts removed and it didn't cost anything. Well, that's not entirely true, the only thing it did cost was taking the time to click "report abuse" and fill out the form. Didn't have to pay anything though. Oh, and I only reported two posts. Someone else did the third, or the moderators on their own. Either way, common sense has prevailed over hate speech.
Same Old Racist Crap

Queenstown, New Zealand

#15 Jan 19, 2013
Must_be_joking_me wrote:
<quoted text>..........People should be allowed to say whatever they want as much as it should stand to be debated as long as it doesn't advocate direct harm against an individual. If anyone was posting anyone's address or singling-out someone for physical harm you might have a point..........
You say that, but then (unlike myself) say nothing about Torqueing Heads wanting to better Brevik's footsteps by massacring not just dozens of people, but an entire race of people. As well as the vast majority of his posts, advocating genocide. Hypocrite much?

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#16 Jan 19, 2013
Same Old Racist Crap wrote:
<quoted text>
You say that, but then (unlike myself) say nothing about Torqueing Heads wanting to better Brevik's footsteps by massacring not just dozens of people, but an entire race of people. As well as the vast majority of his posts, advocating genocide. Hypocrite much?
No Torqueing Heads can say whatever he wants to. Torqueing Heads is against threats against people because of different opinions.Torqueing Heads present his case with factual evidences to back up his claims but people prefer to make threats against him because they can't refute him.

You can't just go berserk and want to get their addresses and wanting to kill them- which people with wounded ego do.

Reporting is futile, you can't change their opinions.
truebluekiwi

Melbourne, Australia

#17 Jan 19, 2013
Good debate.
Anonymous

Ashfield, Australia

#18 Jan 19, 2013
Same Old Racist Crap wrote:
<quoted text>
You say that, but then (unlike myself) say nothing about Torqueing Heads wanting to better Brevik's footsteps by massacring not just dozens of people, but an entire race of people. As well as the vast majority of his posts, advocating genocide. Hypocrite much?
No you're the hypocrite.

You'll report posts you don't like but not ones just as bad by Maoris. Clearly you don't want people's opinions to stand up to debate.

And that's the end and all of it.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#19 Jan 19, 2013
LOL why I got all the bad marks?

“Moumou Tangata ki te Po”

Since: Oct 11

Earth

#20 Jan 19, 2013
good job.... they were stupid topix anyway....... what a wast of your time.... aint you got anything better to do?

well done to the moderators for erasing your hate mail.

“Moumou Tangata ki te Po”

Since: Oct 11

Earth

#21 Jan 19, 2013
Bluebird123x wrote:
<quoted text> Torqueing Heads present his case with factual evidences to back up his claims...
like hell he does.... i don't know where you been.....

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

New Zealand Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
NZ Without Maoris 2 hr 43lbt 102
Who would win in a fight between a Maori and a ... 3 hr Whitepakehapower 13
There Is No Such Thing as Race 3 hr Bobby Johnson 239
N.Z is a foul country 4 hr Samdaman 130
What are some traditional MAORI food recipes? (Feb '14) 4 hr Samdaman 126
New Zealand Named World's Best Country 5 hr Maaaahahahahahaha... 50
can someone explain why the maori are so hated (Jan '13) 5 hr Maaaahahahahahaha... 1,070
why are poly girls so beautiful ? 6 hr Maaaahahahahahaha... 127
More from around the web