Why Obama failed on Syria

While a lot about Syria remains unsettled, one fact is clear: President Obama has failed to convince the public, and the Congress, that attacking the Assad regime is The administration has generated a flood of briefings and hearings, speeches and interviews, tweets and texts. Full Story
First Prev
of 62
Next Last
Syrian

Waterford, CT

#1 Sep 12, 2013
Good Article!!
Ay Caramba

United States

#2 Sep 13, 2013
Well, the lesson he learned is that you can't just present evidence by calling it self-evident, prima facie proof of a smoking gun and requiring no further elaboration and expect much more than a few true believers yelling zig heil and a lot more in laughs.

You have to get up there with a lot of photo shop stuff, some missile cartoons with lit fuses and barrels of payloads marked 'Sarin Gas, property of the Syrian government. Handle with Care', and with a bobbing head CIA director standing behind you for the piece de la resistance.

McCain even offered to bring his good friend, Georgia's dethroned, tie-eating Pres. Saakashvili, ousted by his own people for being a horrible, torturer and dictator but hailed by McCain as a new age democrat, in to show how it's done but Obama passed on the idea. Kerry liked it though.
Adale

Washington, DC

#3 Sep 13, 2013
He failed because we , America, are not going to war just (because.)

And god bless the British
Syrian

Waterford, CT

#4 Sep 13, 2013
Adale wrote:
He failed because we , America, are not going to war just (because.)
And god bless the British
Good point!
reality check

United States

#5 Sep 13, 2013
Adale wrote:
He failed because we , America, are not going to war just (because.)
And god bless the British
just (because)?

I thought it was our proof went poof.
reality check

United States

#6 Sep 13, 2013
Adale wrote:
He failed because we , America, are not going to war just (because.)
And god bless the British
just (because)?

I thought it was because our proof went poof.

“Liberals are stuck on stupid!”

Since: May 11

Location hidden

#7 Sep 13, 2013
You can trust a word that comes out of Obama's mouth!
coyote

Rio Rancho, NM

#8 Sep 13, 2013
100,000 die in conventional warfare without Obama even being willing to send weapons. Then we get outrage from Obama over breach of a figment of the imagination (international law).
Basically, we are being asked to go to war after Obama has screwed the pooch, by waiting so long that the radical Islamists have been greatly strengthened, while the moderates have withered on the vine. Now there are bad and worse choices.
Go to war for Obama's credibility? He has no credibility.
fox is in the henhouse

United States

#9 Sep 13, 2013
Retired SOF wrote:
You can't trust a word that comes out of Obama's mouth!
Or Clinton's either, for that matter - either of them.

On the lighter side though:

I was just on a bushism's website and for the life of me, I can't UNDERSTAND a word that came out of his. LOL

http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/blbus...
nope

Rio Rancho, NM

#10 Sep 13, 2013
easy .... oblunder bluffed with his yellow red lines, putin/assad called his bluff and bams caved like a hooker seeing a roll of quarters just like they knew he would.
reality check

United States

#11 Sep 13, 2013
nope wrote:
easy .... oblunder bluffed with his yellow red lines, putin/assad called his bluff and bams caved like a hooker seeing a roll of quarters just like they knew he would.
Tch tch, so critical of things beyond our grasp.

If this initiative comes off, it may well turn out that Obama was as masterful a tactician as Putin, in bringing this entangled diplomatic dance to a welcome crescendo and recovering from a few tactical errors.

Don't forget, one of the major hurdles to implementation of Geneva II was rebel recalcitrance along with earlier demands from Washington that Assad go, with nothing planned to follow other than pending chaos beyond anyone's control. This initiative suddenly gives everyone enough maneuvering room to hammer out an acceptable transitional plan, while declaring a force majeure (circumstances beyond our control) to any previous negotiations or promises made to the FSA and force them to a rethink of expectations (and extremist alliances) without looking like about-face fools.

Yes sir, it's all coming together nicely now, so long as someone doesn't blow it, by accident or purpose. Al Qaeda though, as always, remains the wild card and spoiler - it will take everything they've got to overcome that ugly detail.
reality check

United States

#12 Sep 13, 2013
For those of you who still insist on painting this latest endeavor as some sort of win-lose or lose-win game between Obama and Putin, I say it's time to cease and desist. It's more the choice of a win-win or a lose-lose outcome for all parties. Time to look to stabilizing this absurdly flawed proxy war and garner some strength to deal with the bigger picture and that is - the fast growing influence of extremist elements in the entire region. It won't be defeated with in-fighting, only strengthened.

“Liberals are stuck on stupid!”

Since: May 11

Location hidden

#13 Sep 14, 2013
fox is in the henhouse wrote:
<quoted text>
Or Clinton's either, for that matter - either of them.
On the lighter side though:
I was just on a bushism's website and for the life of me, I can't UNDERSTAND a word that came out of his. LOL
http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/blbus...
GW was trying to replace dictators and oppressive governments with democracy, Obama is replacing dictators with AQ and the Muslim Brotherhood. Do you think Obama's way will work out any better?
knock knock

United States

#14 Sep 14, 2013
anybody home?

must be nice to live in a state of ignorant bliss.

How're the real estate taxes out your way?
whos there

Seattle, WA

#15 Sep 14, 2013
whats the capital of Ignorant Bliss?

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#16 Sep 14, 2013
Adale wrote:
He failed because we , America, are not going to war just (because.)
And god bless the British
GOD Bless UK. Long Live the Queen!!! And down with the president.

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#17 Sep 14, 2013
coyote wrote:
100,000 die in conventional warfare without Obama even being willing to send weapons. Then we get outrage from Obama over breach of a figment of the imagination (international law).
Basically, we are being asked to go to war after Obama has screwed the pooch, by waiting so long that the radical Islamists have been greatly strengthened, while the moderates have withered on the vine. Now there are bad and worse choices.
Go to war for Obama's credibility? He has no credibility.
But, but, but they had no choice but to wait until they could transform that farce into a "rebellion and civil war". That took time, dude. Remember just a month ago they were all a bragging about how they were a going to partition Syria in Shia areas and Sunni areas and Kurdish areas. Those types of delusions take time, dude. It helped them to sleep well at night although the reality was that they could NEVER overthrow Al-Assad. He is too well entrenched. His legitimacy is based on his claim that he is s\a direct descendant of the Holy Prophet (Peace and Blessings be upon his and his family) Now understand this well: both Sunnis and Shi'is revere members of the prophet's family. For this reason alone, they could never divide and conquer Syria along sectarian lines. It took time for those idiots to learn this simple fact.

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#18 Sep 14, 2013
reality check wrote:
For those of you who still insist on painting this latest endeavor as some sort of win-lose or lose-win game between Obama and Putin, I say it's time to cease and desist. It's more the choice of a win-win or a lose-lose outcome for all parties. Time to look to stabilizing this absurdly flawed proxy war and garner some strength to deal with the bigger picture and that is - the fast growing influence of extremist elements in the entire region. It won't be defeated with in-fighting, only strengthened.
How to spell "Obama won this one" in Arabic:“MOSCOW (AP)-- Russia could expand arms sales to Iran and revise the terms allowing U.S. military transit to Afghanistan if Washington launches a strike on Syria, a senior Russian lawmaker said Wednesday.

“Alexei Pushkov, the Kremlin-connected chief of the foreign affairs committee in the lower house of parliament, told lawmakers that Moscow hopes the U.S. will back Russia's proposal for Syria to put its chemical weapons under international control for their subsequent dismantling.

“During Wednesday's Russian parliament debate of a resolution on Syria, Communists called for an increase in sending Russian weapons to Iran and a revision of the contract allowing the U.S. military to go over Russia to get to Afghanistan.”

Read more: http://www1.whdh.com/news/articles/world/euro...
Syrian

Waterford, CT

#19 Sep 15, 2013
reality check wrote:
For those of you who still insist on painting this latest endeavor as some sort of win-lose or lose-win game between Obama and Putin, I say it's time to cease and desist. It's more the choice of a win-win or a lose-lose outcome for all parties. Time to look to stabilizing this absurdly flawed proxy war and garner some strength to deal with the bigger picture and that is - the fast growing influence of extremist elements in the entire region. It won't be defeated with in-fighting, only strengthened.
Yes, and that is why it is absurd for the West to supper these AlQaeda linked terrorists!
John McCain

United States

#20 Sep 15, 2013
Syrian wrote:
<quoted text> Yes, and that is why it is absurd for the West to supper these AlQaeda linked terrorists!
There is no such thing as al Qaeda! How many times do I have to repeat myself?

Besides, those freedom fighters are very hospitable. They even slaughtered a sheep and cooked up some tasty rice pilaf for my entourage, although I don't really understand why the carcass looked a bit strange and had a Christian cross around its neck. Well, we have to welcome foreign cultures if we're to build reliable allies around the world. That's my motto.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 62
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Middle East Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Palestinians to cut ties with Israel if UN gamb... 14 min Justice 6
Venizelos slams Turkey for 'flagrant violation ... 33 min KARAmanlis 383
Foreign Policy In 2014: Tensions In Karabakh, E... 34 min Dander 4
Turkey plans to establish an Islamic university... 46 min Just a guy 18
Obama and the U.N. vs. Israel? 1 hr Real Semite 9
Fierce Critic of Islam Honored at Israel's Open... 3 hr Yumpin Yimminy 9
IS said to execute 100 foreign fighters who wan... 3 hr Apu Nahasapeemape... 10
More from around the web