U.S. sends troops to monitor Syria

A portrait of al-Assad sits on rubble along a street in the Saif al-Dawla district of the northern city of Aleppo on Tuesday -- The United States deployed troops to Jordan to help monitor Syria's stockpile of chemical weapons and determine what efforts to take if violence spreads to neighboring nations, the U.S. defense chief said.

[DENG]

.S. sends troops to monitor Syria

THE U.S. TROOPS ARE IN JORDAN TO TRAIN TERRORISTS TO DEPLOY INTO SYRIA TO DO TERRORISM.

[BOZ-OK]

WELL... I WOULD JUST ASK YOUR OPINION ABOUT THE CHINESE TERRORISM IN XINJIANG FOR 60 YEARS?

Any answer?

[Star]

First proxy war,uner cover killers and then Troops ...

Good plan of US...destroy another Muslim country...

[Observer]

The US only wants to be humanitarian to refugees who are trying to escape and keep peace in the lands. The true US citizens including military have humanity and want to see Syrian innocent civilians safe and the war to be rissolved. US intervenes only bc noone else will! If US cannot stop a war- who will? It will not be rissolved on its own- it will grow out of control.

[Chris]

BOZ-OK wrote:

WELL... I WOULD JUST ASK YOUR OPINION ABOUT THE CHINESE TERRORISM IN XINJIANG FOR 60 YEARS?
Any answer?

You might have a geography and history neglect. Regarding terrorism, border disputes and the interventions of some country from miles away, without any geographical or historical connection, is a World of difference.

[Chris]

Observer wrote:

The US only wants to be humanitarian to refugees who are trying to escape and keep peace in the lands. The true US citizens including military have humanity and want to see Syrian innocent civilians safe and the war to be rissolved. US intervenes only bc noone else will! If US cannot stop a war- who will? It will not be rissolved on its own- it will grow out of control.

Do you think the U.S. has its borders?

[Brit Expat]

Chris wrote:

<quoted text>
Do you think the U.S. has its borders?

Yes it has and should bloody well stay within them. Ever since WW11 every military adventure the school boys of the "USless" has been a disaster, for the World and the American people. Pure GREED rules. OK!!!!!!!!!!

The Atheist aged 81.

[George]

BOZ-OK wrote:

WELL... I WOULD JUST ASK YOUR OPINION ABOUT THE CHINESE TERRORISM IN XINJIANG FOR 60 YEARS?
Any answer?

He never replies except with his Robo-blogging. I have asked him those questions for a year now and no response.

[George]

Observer wrote:

The US only wants to be humanitarian to refugees who are trying to escape and keep peace in the lands. The true US citizens including military have humanity and want to see Syrian innocent civilians safe and the war to be rissolved. US intervenes only bc noone else will! If US cannot stop a war- who will? It will not be rissolved on its own- it will grow out of control.

I agree, they are not going to Jordan to create military resistance but to protect the innocent that have escaped harm in syria, their purpose in Jordan is to prevent harm to the people in the refugee camps because Jordan has said they cannot supply enough military support to do that and the US is already in Jordan, however our Robo-bloggers will pick up on this as an act of military strategy to enter Syria, which I am not opposed to at this point and would like to see 200,000 troops enter Syria and force peace, stop the violence, ground the jets and helicopters, stop the tanks and Rebel advances and force dialogue between the factions and pull in the al Queda forces. Obviously Assad and the Rebels are past the point of negotiating and someone must step in to stop the death and destruction that has escalated out of control. Nato peacekeeping forces should be employed then to keep the factions from arming until a solution is reached and the innocent protected. Whether you support Assad or Rebels, peace must be first and formost on the agenda and just like kids they must be put in the quiet room for awhile to think about their actions then bring them out to talk about it, violence would not be allowed as an option. As far as style of government that would have to be controlled by the people of Syria and a free and uninfluenced vote be allowed without interference from the Rebels or Assad.

[Chris]

George wrote:

<quoted text>
I agree, they are not going to Jordan to create military resistance but to protect the innocent that have escaped harm in syria, their purpose in Jordan is to prevent harm to the people in the refugee camps because Jordan has said they cannot supply enough military support to do that and the US is already in Jordan, however our Robo-bloggers will pick up on this as an act of military strategy to enter Syria, which I am not opposed to at this point and would like to see 200,000 troops enter Syria and force peace, stop the violence, ground the jets and helicopters, stop the tanks and Rebel advances and force dialogue between the factions and pull in the al Queda forces. Obviously Assad and the Rebels are past the point of negotiating and someone must step in to stop the death and destruction that has escalated out of control. Nato peacekeeping forces should be employed then to keep the factions from arming until a solution is reached and the innocent protected. Whether you support Assad or Rebels, peace must be first and formost on the agenda and just like kids they must be put in the quiet room for awhile to think about their actions then bring them out to talk about it, violence would not be allowed as an option. As far as style of government that would have to be controlled by the people of Syria and a free and uninfluenced vote be allowed without interference from the Rebels or Assad.

What you forgot is that Syrians are not children, and that the U.S. and NATO are not their parents. Syria is sovereign country with the legitimate Government, which is re-establishing the Law and Order; as the government has the right, and the duty to do.

[BOZ-OK]

Chris wrote:

<quoted text>
You might have a geography and history neglect. Regarding terrorism, border disputes and the interventions of some country from miles away, without any geographical or historical connection, is a World of difference.

And you make this statement only due to your ignorance... Xinjiang is called "Eastern Turkistan" and the owners of this land, Uyghurs are as much Turks as i am... As a hint to you, our prime minister communicated with Uyghurs in Turkish during his last visit to Xinjian while Chinese officials were irrelevant foreigners there...:))))

Xinjian is an occupied Turk land for 60 years...

For your educational proposes;

http://www.uyghurcanadiansociety.org/sidebar/...

And as they describe themselves;

...they are Turks of Central Asia....

[BOZ-OK]

George wrote:

<quoted text>
He never replies except with his Robo-blogging. I have asked him those questions for a year now and no response.

You have got the answer you illiterate clown... I am not an unemployed scum who spends whole day before a computer screen, unlike you...

[Bronzilla]

BOZ-OK wrote:

<quoted text>

red is where turdarabs are

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-1t7WIj7Oh20/UHXXK08...

[BOZ-OK]

Bronzilla wrote:

<quoted text>
red is where turdarabs are
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-1t7WIj7Oh20/UHXXK08...

I understand your feelings too... How are the rivots going on nowadays by the way? Do you still keep burning down your own homes?

[Syrian]

Chris wrote:

<quoted text>
What you forgot is that Syrians are not children, and that the U.S. and NATO are not their parents. Syria is sovereign country with the legitimate Government, which is re-establishing the Law and Order; as the government has the right, and the duty to do.

The West doesn't recognize "legitimate governments" that they have targeted for "regime change".

[Bronzilla]

BOZ-OK wrote:

<quoted text>
I understand your feelings too... How are the rivots going on nowadays by the way? Do you still keep burning down your own homes?

everything very fine

exercising for our meeting soon ;))))

[BOZ-OK]

George wrote:

<quoted text>
He never replies except with his Robo-blogging. I have asked him those questions for a year now and no response.

George, please accept my apolagizes for my previous post, it was a total misunderstanding...

[DENG]

WHAT XINJIANG TERRORISM???

BOZ-OK wrote:

WELL... I WOULD JUST ASK YOUR OPINION ABOUT THE CHINESE TERRORISM IN XINJIANG FOR 60 YEARS?
Any answer?

[Professor Ayreshire]

DENG wrote:

WHAT XINJIANG TERRORISM???
<quoted text>

You've got a lot of gall Dung!! Remember Tiananmen Square massacre??? LIKE NAZI GERMANY, CHINA UNDERSTANDS HOW TO CONTROL THEIR OWN PEOPLE WITH RUTHLESS TYRANNY! Stop the silly nonsense Chinese Government Paid sock puppet!! DUNG IS THE LAUGHING STOCK OF THIS ENTIRE FORUM. NOBODY LISTENS TO HIS IGNORANT NONSENSE EXCEPT IGNORANT FOOLS LIKE THE SYRIANUTCASE, PAPADIAMGREASEDICK, LIL' JOEY POOPY PANTS, LIL' WAYNE AND HIS POOPY PANTS FRIENDS, PETESASS AND RAMBONEHEAD!!
ANOTHER CONFUSED DUNG THERE?
THE TRAITORS AND TREASONOUS ARE IN THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT IN BEIJING AND ALL RUN BY A RUTHLESS DICTATOR AND SUCKING THE LIFE BLOOD OF THE POOR! CHINA SUPPORTS SYRIA AND GUESS WHAT? THERE IS NO FREEDOM IN CHINA!! THE CLOWNS RUNNING CHINA DICTATE HOW MANY CHILDREN THEY CAN HAVE TO THE INTERNET! THAT'S WHY DENGBAT HAS BEEN ABLE TO RUN HIS BIG LYING MOUTH 24/7 WITHOUT HIS DICTATOR COMING DOWN ON HIM!!
HTTP://EN.WIKIPEDIA.ORG/WIKI/INTERNET_CENSORS ...'S_REPUBLIC_OF_CHINA
HTTP://WWW.TECHNOLOGYREVIEW.COM/BLOG/ARXIV/27 ...
HTTP://WWW.DISINFO.COM/TAG/CHINA/

[DENG]

never replies

ASK, BUT TRY TO HAVE A TWO-SOURCE QUESTION NOT THE TYPICAL UNITED STATES, RUBBERSTAMPED GOVERNMENT-APPROVED ONE SOURCE SITES.

BESIDES, YOU ARE BRAINWASHED WITH THE ONE-SOURCE INFORMATION SYNDROME, SO THEN HOW IS IT POSSIBLE FOR YOU TO ASK INTELLIGENT QUESTIONS WITH YOUR LOPSIDED INTELLIGENCE. IT'S LIKE YOU ONLY USE ONE-SIDE OF YOUR BRAIN, RIGHT, THE PROPER THINKING IN THE UNITED STATES REGIME'S PROPAGANDA-STYLE THINKING METHODS???

BOZ-OK wrote:

WELL... I WOULD JUST ASK YOUR OPINION ABOUT THE CHINESE TERRORISM IN XINJIANG FOR 60 YEARS?

Any answer?

He never replies except with his Robo-blogging. I have asked him those questions for a year now and no response.

George wrote:

<quoted text>
He never replies except with his Robo-blogging. I have asked him those questions for a year now and no response.