Russian warships set sail to Mediterranean amid possible Syria evacuation

[Jay]

Syrian wrote:

<quoted text> The US, the UK, France, Russia, and China have the right to their opinions and positions on any world conflict or issue. The entire purpose of the UN is to have the differences of nations addressed in a diplomatic forum, instead of settling their differences through conflict and bloodshed.

Then why doesnt the entire security council change seats out for other member states, we get 2 spots that float but the arms sales countries get to control permanent seats? AS Russia and China have openly admitted selling arms to Syria recently an end to the conflict would cost them money.

[Dimitri100]

George wrote:

<quoted text>.
I think it comes down to the guranteed vote cannot be used to stop other countries involvement in the war and that country can participate. In other words if Russia stopped the security counsel from sending troops into Syria then Russia joined Assad, that would be illegal, would it take Russias vote away, I do not know.

.

JackassGeorge talking bollocks again.

If Russia vetos a resolution to send troops into Syria,

It will be illegal for any country or countries to send troops into Syria.

Example...Iraq war was an illegal war and if the ICC was a fit and proper Institution, T Blair and G W Bush would have been convicted and would be in jail by now.

I suggest to Jackassgeorge, post what you know...not what you think.

[Jay]

Dimitri100 wrote:

<quoted text>.
JackassGeorge talking bollocks again.
If Russia vetos a resolution to send troops into Syria,
It will be illegal for any country or countries to send troops into Syria.
Example...Iraq war was an illegal war and if the ICC was a fit and proper Institution, T Blair and G W Bush would have been convicted and would be in jail by now.
I suggest to Jackassgeorge, post what you know...not what you think.

Your surprising right on Iraq! I'm shocked Dimitri what's gotten in to you? What have you done with the other Dimwit who doesn't know anything?
Canada did not participate in Iraq with any land forces or violate Iraqi airspace because it was not sanctioned by the UN.( Ps. Sunshine exchange officers don't count )
Bush telephoned our Prime Minister and he publicly stated we would gladly send forces if the UN sanctioned the action. The UN did not so techniquely it was an offensive action that was illegal. Regardless there's no one on earth that would dare arrest the US president, if he was way wrong the congress would impeach him..

[Dimitri100]

Jay wrote:

<quoted text>
Your surprising right on Iraq! I'm shocked Dimitri what's gotten in to you? What have you done with the other Dimwit who doesn't know anything?
Canada did not participate in Iraq with any land forces or violate Iraqi airspace because it was not sanctioned by the UN.( Ps. Sunshine exchange officers don't count )
Bush telephoned our Prime Minister and he publicly stated we would gladly send forces if the UN sanctioned the action. The UN did not so techniquely it was an offensive action that was illegal. Regardless there's no one on earth that would dare arrest the US president, if he was way wrong the congress would impeach him..

.

As I said, the ICC is not a fit and proper Institution.

You're still talking bollocks jackassjay.

[Neville Thompson]

George wrote:

<quoted text>
I think Neville is saying that if Russia takes up arms with Syria nd joining in the fight with boots on the groun they stand a chance of loosing the seat by going agains the majority vote

Their vote would be seen as a conflict of interest

[Neville Thompson]

Dimitri100 wrote:

JackassGeorge talking bollocks, any country with a veto CANNOT lose it's seat regardless.
I did not name you JackassGeorge for nothing,
you are a dumbass. Hehehehe.

We didn't name you "dimwit" for nothing .

[Neville Thompson]

George wrote:

<quoted text>
Sorry I just read his post again, and he is saying that Russia cannot show bias by siding with Assad in the conflict. They can express an opinion about not removing Assad as part of a deal and vote against a resolution that states that but they cannot show bias that has affected their vote

If they do it undermines the whole concept of the UN SECURITY COUNCIL

[truth always beats lIes23]

Neville Thompson wrote:

<quoted text>
If they do it undermines the whole concept of the UN SECURITY COUNCIL

The UN is a joke as it was from day one and you know this george.If the Un was a real body it would have stopped the american government and israel many wars ago.

[truth always beats lIes23]

Jay wrote:

<quoted text>
Your surprising right on Iraq! I'm shocked Dimitri what's gotten in to you? What have you done with the other Dimwit who doesn't know anything?
Canada did not participate in Iraq with any land forces or violate Iraqi airspace because it was not sanctioned by the UN.( Ps. Sunshine exchange officers don't count )
Bush telephoned our Prime Minister and he publicly stated we would gladly send forces if the UN sanctioned the action. The UN did not so techniquely it was an offensive action that was illegal. Regardless there's no one on earth that would dare arrest the US president, if he was way wrong the congress would impeach him..

The congress is a pathetic joke and controlled by groups like aipac just as the so called president is.The america people have no power in america as the constitution intended as the power has been given to israel,jews,and large corporations controlled by those in the service of israel and jews.You already know this george.

[Dimitri100]

truth always beats lIes23 wrote:

<quoted text>The UN is a joke as it was from day one and you know this george.If the Un was a real body it would have stopped the american government and israel many wars ago.

.

It's strange Jackassgeorge/jay/neville talks bollocks and actually believes the garbage he spews,

he must be one dumb jackass.

[Jude]

There are certain dumb fools who are hired to play down the blood that is flowing in $yria. They are from now defunct SANA. The real Syria will triumph.

[Jude]

George wrote:

<quoted text>
people like to bitch about the ugliness of war, the visible horror of young people dying of the destruction of property but what they do not look back and realize is that not only North Americans but people all over the world are enjoying more and more peace because of these brave souls that died so that we can have a better life but do they say anything about the life they have in the US, Canada, UK, Europe, South America and on and on, NO, they still bitch.

they regard this war as war of extermination.hence they still have sex,make wives pregnant and kill fathers mothers and children

[Dimitri100]

Jude wrote:

There are certain dumb fools who are hired to play down the blood that is flowing in $yria. They are from now defunct SANA. The real Syria will triumph.

.

We all hope Syria and Assad will triumph.

[Jay]

Dimitri100 wrote:

<quoted text>.
As I said, the ICC is not a fit and proper Institution.
You're still talking bollocks jackassjay.

Love you too Ruskie!

[truth always beats lIes23]

Jude wrote:

There are certain dumb fools who are hired to play down the blood that is flowing in $yria. They are from now defunct SANA. The real Syria will triumph.

Still posting your lies jew hasbarat?? Things like you are the ones hired to try and push a scripted lie deflecting from the truth which is that the american government and israel have been behind the terrorist activity in Syria from the start.What is sana?? Are you talking about the Syrian news agency?? It is still very much active and still posting facts daily and no I never worked for it.

[truth always beats lIes23]

Jude wrote:

<quoted text> they regard this war as war of extermination.hence they still have sex,make wives pregnant and kill fathers mothers and children

Yes it is very sad what the terrorist supporters in america and israel are doing to Syria.

[Rtloder]

Neville Thompson wrote:

<quoted text>
Your very description of Dimitri 100 says it all seeing you yourself have described him as being "dimwit".
By the way your intellect is out in the open for all to see, seeing you can't even spell my name correctly even though I am staring you straight in the face.

Sorry about that I Hebrew some times, I trying to correct it.

[Leo]

Dimitri100 wrote:

<quoted text>.
We all hope Syria and Assad will triumph.

+1 However, the hopes of small.=(

[Syrian]

George wrote:

<quoted text>.
I think it comes down to the guranteed vote cannot be used to stop other countries involvement in the war and that country can participate. In other words if Russia stopped the security counsel from sending troops into Syria then Russia joined Assad, that would be illegal, would it take Russias vote away, I do not know.

Nope! If the Security council voted agains Israel, and a conflict arose where the US had to back Israel, the US still could not be ejected from the council or from the UN.

[Syrian]

Jay wrote:

<quoted text>
Then why doesnt the entire security council change seats out for other member states, we get 2 spots that float but the arms sales countries get to control permanent seats? AS Russia and China have openly admitted selling arms to Syria recently an end to the conflict would cost them money.

Once again, the UN is there to promote dialogue between nations when they have conflicting views! Many nations have contributed money and weapons to the Syrian rebels, in clear violation of any arms embargo. Expelling them would defeat the entire purpose of the UN.