Trade puts U.S.-Russian relations at turning point

Is Russia a friend, foe or frenemy? That question hangs over Congress as lawmakers ponder whether to grant a former adversary normalized trade relations. Full Story
George

Red Deer, Canada

#45 Nov 18, 2012
ocxz wrote:
<quoted text>
Why don't you take israeli citizenship ?
Is that supposed to be an insult?? Nothing wrong with living in Israel.
Syrian

New London, CT

#46 Nov 18, 2012
ocxz wrote:
<quoted text>
Why don't you take israeli citizenship ?
I'm sure he already has it! Remember that clown "claims" to have been a jet pilot in the Israeli air force!! LOL!!!
Syrian nice

Calgary, Canada

#47 Nov 18, 2012
Dimitri100 wrote:
<quoted text>.
The problem is not Russia and China,
the problems of this world are caused by the imperialists, racist nazis, living south of the border from you.
The world has to start taking united Russia and China with most attention.Today these two united countries consume refine 38 mbpd equivalent combined energy(oil, gas, power) compared to 36 mbpd by America.It stands as such:

Oil: US = 18 MBPD, China = 10 mbpd, Russia = 5.5 mbpd

Power: US = 4.5 billion MEGAWATT PY(EQUIVALENT TO 7 MBPD OIL)
China = 5.1 billionmega watt py or equiv to 8 MBPD OIL
Russia = 1.2 billion mega watt py or equiv to 2 MBPD

Gas: US = 22 TRILLION CUBIC FEET PY (OR EQUIVALENT TO 11 MPBD)
RUSSIA= 22 TRILLION CUBIC FEET PY (OR EQUIVALENT TO 11 MPBD
China = 4 tcfpy or equivalent to 2 MBPD

Total Energy Use/ Refining

United Russia - China = 38.5 MBPD EQUIVALENT

US = 36 MBPD EQUIVALENT

And the present and future looks far more faster advancing for Chin and Russia united.

SO TAKE ALL MIGHTY ONES SERIOUSLY AND AVOID WW3.LOVE OUR VERY BEAUTIFUL HUMANITY AND GIVE THEM FLOWERS AND KISSES RATHER THAN BLEEDING THE PRETTY ONES THROUGH UGLY BULLETS AND GUNS.
max

United States

#48 Nov 18, 2012
Syrian wrote:
<quoted text> I'm sure he already has it! Remember that clown "claims" to have been a jet pilot in the Israeli air force!! LOL!!!
someone has to fly those planes, can you prove him wrong?

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#49 Nov 18, 2012
Syrian nice wrote:
<quoted text>
The world has to start taking united Russia and China with most attention.Today these two united countries consume refine 38 mbpd equivalent combined energy(oil, gas, power) compared to 36 mbpd by America.It stands as such:
Oil: US = 18 MBPD, China = 10 mbpd, Russia = 5.5 mbpd
Power: US = 4.5 billion MEGAWATT PY(EQUIVALENT TO 7 MBPD OIL)
China = 5.1 billionmega watt py or equiv to 8 MBPD OIL
Russia = 1.2 billion mega watt py or equiv to 2 MBPD
Gas: US = 22 TRILLION CUBIC FEET PY (OR EQUIVALENT TO 11 MPBD)
RUSSIA= 22 TRILLION CUBIC FEET PY (OR EQUIVALENT TO 11 MPBD
China = 4 tcfpy or equivalent to 2 MBPD
Total Energy Use/ Refining
United Russia - China = 38.5 MBPD EQUIVALENT
US = 36 MBPD EQUIVALENT
And the present and future looks far more faster advancing for Chin and Russia united.
SO TAKE ALL MIGHTY ONES SERIOUSLY AND AVOID WW3.LOVE OUR VERY BEAUTIFUL HUMANITY AND GIVE THEM FLOWERS AND KISSES RATHER THAN BLEEDING THE PRETTY ONES THROUGH UGLY BULLETS AND GUNS.
.

I see, ok.
Syrian

New London, CT

#50 Nov 18, 2012
max wrote:
<quoted text>someone has to fly those planes, can you prove him wrong?
No, but it's hard to see that level of insanity trying to pilot anything!
Syrian

New London, CT

#51 Nov 18, 2012
Syrian nice wrote:
<quoted text>
The world has to start taking united Russia and China with most attention.Today these two united countries consume refine 38 mbpd equivalent combined energy(oil, gas, power) compared to 36 mbpd by America.It stands as such:
Oil: US = 18 MBPD, China = 10 mbpd, Russia = 5.5 mbpd
Power: US = 4.5 billion MEGAWATT PY(EQUIVALENT TO 7 MBPD OIL)
China = 5.1 billionmega watt py or equiv to 8 MBPD OIL
Russia = 1.2 billion mega watt py or equiv to 2 MBPD
Gas: US = 22 TRILLION CUBIC FEET PY (OR EQUIVALENT TO 11 MPBD)
RUSSIA= 22 TRILLION CUBIC FEET PY (OR EQUIVALENT TO 11 MPBD
China = 4 tcfpy or equivalent to 2 MBPD
Total Energy Use/ Refining
United Russia - China = 38.5 MBPD EQUIVALENT
US = 36 MBPD EQUIVALENT
And the present and future looks far more faster advancing for Chin and Russia united.
SO TAKE ALL MIGHTY ONES SERIOUSLY AND AVOID WW3.LOVE OUR VERY BEAUTIFUL HUMANITY AND GIVE THEM FLOWERS AND KISSES RATHER THAN BLEEDING THE PRETTY ONES THROUGH UGLY BULLETS AND GUNS.
The West is taking Russia and China very seriously. No one wants to get into a nuclear war because of these insurgent rebel terrorists!

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#52 Nov 18, 2012
Syrian wrote:
<quoted text> The West is taking Russia and China very seriously. No one wants to get into a nuclear war because of these insurgent rebel terrorists!
.

Then why does the USA and Europe back them in Libya, Syria, etc etc.
ocxz

Saint-denis, Reunion

#53 Nov 18, 2012
George wrote:
<quoted text>
Is that supposed to be an insult?? Nothing wrong with living in Israel.
Does it look like an insult ? Why, if you root so much for Israel, is there anything wrong to apply for citizenship or nationality ?
Now you tell me is there anything wrong with living in Israel ?
As far as i know i haven't mentionned that.
Syrian

New London, CT

#54 Nov 18, 2012
Dimitri100 wrote:
<quoted text>.
Then why does the USA and Europe back them in Libya, Syria, etc etc.
Because the West knows from Afghanistan that winning a military victory in these Middle Eastern counties is almost impossible, and extremely costly in lives and taxpayer money! Their only hope of achieving a "regime change" is by attempting to encourage, fuel and arm insurgencies.

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#55 Nov 19, 2012
ocxz wrote:
<quoted text>
Does it look like an insult ? Why, if you root so much for Israel, is there anything wrong to apply for citizenship or nationality ?
Now you tell me is there anything wrong with living in Israel ?
As far as i know i haven't mentionned that.
.

Nothing wrong at all living in Israel,

if you like the place, or if you have to live there for some reason.

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#56 Nov 19, 2012
Precisely, if no one wants to get into a nuclear war, western powers should get their snouts out of the Middle East.
Syrian

New London, CT

#57 Nov 19, 2012
Dimitri100 wrote:
Precisely, if no one wants to get into a nuclear war, western powers should get their snouts out of the Middle East.
Truer fords were never spoken! Could not agree with you more.
ocxz

Reunion

#58 Nov 19, 2012
Dimitri100 wrote:
Precisely, if no one wants to get into a nuclear war, western powers should get their snouts out of the Middle East.
Nuclear war is unthinkable.
The bare concept of nuclear weapons is irrational.

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#59 Nov 19, 2012
ocxz wrote:
<quoted text>
Nuclear war is unthinkable.
The bare concept of nuclear weapons is irrational.
.

Any killing, be it of humans or animals is,

fundamentally wrong, it's barbaric, it's uncivilised.
Syrian

New London, CT

#60 Nov 19, 2012
Dimitri100 wrote:
<quoted text>.
Any killing, be it of humans or animals is,
fundamentally wrong, it's barbaric, it's uncivilised.
True, and that is why diplomacy should be used to settle disagreements, not bloodshed!
neutral observer

Lake Worth, FL

#61 Nov 19, 2012
Syrian wrote:
<quoted text> Because the West knows from Afghanistan that winning a military victory in these Middle Eastern counties is almost impossible, and extremely costly in lives and taxpayer money! Their only hope of achieving a "regime change" is by attempting to encourage, fuel and arm insurgencies.
No. What the boneheaded idea about arming Islamic mujahedeen in Afghanistan during the Carter and REagan administrations proved is quite the opposite. The secular Soviet backed regime in Kabul would never have done anything like 9/11. It was no threat to the west. It was only because Washington supported Islamic radicalism that...

Encouraging regime change in the Moslem world only benefits folks like Al Quieda and Hezbollah. We are much better off with the Quadafis and Assads still in...
neutral observer

Lake Worth, FL

#62 Nov 19, 2012
ocxz wrote:
<quoted text>
Nuclear war is unthinkable.
The bare concept of nuclear weapons is irrational.
Are you suggesting it rational for NATO to rain death on cities from the air but only in small weak nations unable to defend themselves? Is that not criminal?

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#63 Nov 19, 2012
You're absolutely right.
Syrian

New London, CT

#64 Nov 19, 2012
Dimitri100 wrote:
You're absolutely right.
Agreed!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Middle East Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Israel's end is near, Ahmadinejad says (Jun '07) 56 min An NFL Fan 37,244
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 59 min Frijoles 69,930
Gulf Air and Citi Bahrain launch 'Fly Now, Pay ... 1 hr MOMIN ANSARI 1
Gulf Air to resume flights to Shiraz 1 hr MOMIN ANSARI 1
Sarkozy overheard telling Obama Netanyahu's a liar (Nov '11) 2 hr WelbyMD 172
Blaming Israel for carnage (Jul '06) 2 hr Mandela 118,636
Another bad Iran idea 5 hr well 4

Middle East People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE